Establishment of the prone transpsoas fusion surgery in Australia-a survey and analysis of major complications in early adopters.

Q1 Medicine
Journal of spine surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-24 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.21037/jss-24-128
Vijidha Shree Rajkumar, Brian Owler, Bryden Dawes, Idrees Sher, Yi Yuen Wang
{"title":"Establishment of the prone transpsoas fusion surgery in Australia-a survey and analysis of major complications in early adopters.","authors":"Vijidha Shree Rajkumar, Brian Owler, Bryden Dawes, Idrees Sher, Yi Yuen Wang","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prone transpsoas (PTP) fusion is a single-position variant of direct transpsoas interbody reconstruction that is increasing in popularity in Australia. This technique provides simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns while maintaining the familiar prone position and utilising position-specific equipment. However, major vascular, visceral, and neurological complications associated with the procedure remain a concern for spine surgeons. Our study aims to elucidate the safety profile of PTP fusion among early adopters in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Australian surgeons interested in the PTP approach underwent surgical education and training prior to their first PTP procedure. All PTP-trained surgeons were invited to participate in the study through an online survey of 14 questions querying their PTP experience. Of the 20 PTP-trained surgeons, 16 responded to the survey, representing 293 out of 327 PTP surgeries completed in Australia from March 2023 to May 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 16 surgeons (80%) from the Australian PTP community, encompassing 293 PTP surgeries (90%) completed. The surgeon cohort reported no major vascular or visceral complications. There are two cases (0.68%) of weakness of the psoas muscle, two cases (0.68%) of sustained motor deficits, and four cases (1.37%) of sensory deficits. Additionally, there are two cases (0.68%) of vertebral fractures or implant subsidence requiring re-operation and four cases (1.37%) of surgical site infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows the successful establishment of PTP procedure following a PTP surgical training model. The survey's high response rate reinforces the low complication rates encountered by our surgeons and adds to the safety profile of this novel procedure. Additionally, it underscores the significance of surgical education and training opportunities in minimally invasive spinal fusion techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"11 1","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prone transpsoas (PTP) fusion is a single-position variant of direct transpsoas interbody reconstruction that is increasing in popularity in Australia. This technique provides simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns while maintaining the familiar prone position and utilising position-specific equipment. However, major vascular, visceral, and neurological complications associated with the procedure remain a concern for spine surgeons. Our study aims to elucidate the safety profile of PTP fusion among early adopters in Australia.

Methods: Australian surgeons interested in the PTP approach underwent surgical education and training prior to their first PTP procedure. All PTP-trained surgeons were invited to participate in the study through an online survey of 14 questions querying their PTP experience. Of the 20 PTP-trained surgeons, 16 responded to the survey, representing 293 out of 327 PTP surgeries completed in Australia from March 2023 to May 2024.

Results: The survey was completed by 16 surgeons (80%) from the Australian PTP community, encompassing 293 PTP surgeries (90%) completed. The surgeon cohort reported no major vascular or visceral complications. There are two cases (0.68%) of weakness of the psoas muscle, two cases (0.68%) of sustained motor deficits, and four cases (1.37%) of sensory deficits. Additionally, there are two cases (0.68%) of vertebral fractures or implant subsidence requiring re-operation and four cases (1.37%) of surgical site infections.

Conclusions: Our study shows the successful establishment of PTP procedure following a PTP surgical training model. The survey's high response rate reinforces the low complication rates encountered by our surgeons and adds to the safety profile of this novel procedure. Additionally, it underscores the significance of surgical education and training opportunities in minimally invasive spinal fusion techniques.

澳大利亚俯卧转腰肌融合手术的建立——早期患者主要并发症的调查与分析。
背景:俯卧转腰肌(PTP)融合是直接转腰肌体间重建的一种单体位形式,在澳大利亚越来越受欢迎。该技术在保持熟悉的俯卧位和利用位置专用设备的同时,提供对前后柱的同时访问。然而,与手术相关的主要血管、内脏和神经系统并发症仍然是脊柱外科医生关注的问题。我们的研究旨在阐明PTP融合在澳大利亚早期采用者中的安全性。方法:对PTP入路感兴趣的澳大利亚外科医生在首次PTP手术前接受了外科教育和培训。所有接受过PTP培训的外科医生都被邀请参加这项研究,通过一项在线调查,调查了14个问题,询问他们的PTP经验。在20名接受过PTP培训的外科医生中,有16名回应了调查,代表了澳大利亚从2023年3月到2024年5月完成的327例PTP手术中的293例。结果:来自澳大利亚PTP社区的16名外科医生(80%)完成了调查,其中完成了293例PTP手术(90%)。外科医生队列报告没有主要的血管或内脏并发症。腰大肌无力2例(0.68%),持续性运动障碍2例(0.68%),感觉障碍4例(1.37%)。此外,2例(0.68%)椎体骨折或植入物下沉需要再次手术,4例(1.37%)手术部位感染。结论:本研究成功建立了PTP手术训练模式。调查的高反应率强化了我们的外科医生遇到的低并发症发生率,并增加了这种新手术的安全性。此外,它强调了微创脊柱融合技术的外科教育和培训机会的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of spine surgery
Journal of spine surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信