Biomechanical study of the Nice knot as an alternative fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
João Pedro Oliveira, José Carlos Noronha, António Completo
{"title":"Biomechanical study of the Nice knot as an alternative fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.","authors":"João Pedro Oliveira, José Carlos Noronha, António Completo","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>All-inside, one of the most popular techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in which suspensory cortical devices for graft fixation are mandatory, has a technical concern during intra-articular passage of the fixation device. This can be overpass using a Nice knot tied over a button after the intra-articular passage of the graft avoiding, by this, any possible debris that can lock its progression and compromise final fixation. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that a Nice knot tied over a button has similar biomechanical performance to that of the currently available cortical fixation devices on the market and is suitable for anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This controlled laboratory study was performed using two different validated cortical fixation devices for comparison: Endobutton, as a fixed loop, and Ultrabutton, as an adjustable loop. The devices were preconditioned; a cyclic loading of 50-250 N was applied for 1000 cycles and finally pulled to failure at 50 mm/min. Biomechanical properties of the devices were tested in terms of elongation, ultimate strength, and stiffness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ultimate strength and displacement differences between the Nice knot and Endobutton were significant (p < 0.05). No significant differences in displacement and stiffness were found between the Nice knot and Ultrabutton; however, the ultimate failure load was significantly higher (p < 0.05) for Ultrabutton than for the Nice knot.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The performance of the Nice knot tied over a button exhibits similar displacement and stiffness characteristics to the Ultrabutton. However, its maximum ultimate strength (838 ± 28 N) is significantly lower than both tested devices. Despite this, it remains superior to the physiological forces experienced by patients during the initial phases of ACL rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: All-inside, one of the most popular techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in which suspensory cortical devices for graft fixation are mandatory, has a technical concern during intra-articular passage of the fixation device. This can be overpass using a Nice knot tied over a button after the intra-articular passage of the graft avoiding, by this, any possible debris that can lock its progression and compromise final fixation. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that a Nice knot tied over a button has similar biomechanical performance to that of the currently available cortical fixation devices on the market and is suitable for anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation.

Methods: This controlled laboratory study was performed using two different validated cortical fixation devices for comparison: Endobutton, as a fixed loop, and Ultrabutton, as an adjustable loop. The devices were preconditioned; a cyclic loading of 50-250 N was applied for 1000 cycles and finally pulled to failure at 50 mm/min. Biomechanical properties of the devices were tested in terms of elongation, ultimate strength, and stiffness.

Results: The ultimate strength and displacement differences between the Nice knot and Endobutton were significant (p < 0.05). No significant differences in displacement and stiffness were found between the Nice knot and Ultrabutton; however, the ultimate failure load was significantly higher (p < 0.05) for Ultrabutton than for the Nice knot.

Conclusions: The performance of the Nice knot tied over a button exhibits similar displacement and stiffness characteristics to the Ultrabutton. However, its maximum ultimate strength (838 ± 28 N) is significantly lower than both tested devices. Despite this, it remains superior to the physiological forces experienced by patients during the initial phases of ACL rehabilitation.

尼斯结作为前交叉韧带重建替代固定物的生物力学研究。
背景:All-inside是前交叉韧带重建中最流行的技术之一,其中悬吊皮质装置用于移植物固定是强制性的,在固定装置在关节内通过时存在技术问题。在移植物关节内通过后,可使用尼斯结系在钮扣上,以避免任何可能锁定其进展并危及最终固定的碎片。本研究旨在验证尼斯结系在纽扣上与目前市场上可用的皮质固定装置具有相似的生物力学性能,并且适用于前交叉韧带移植固定的假设。方法:本对照实验室研究采用两种不同的经验证的皮质固定装置进行比较:Endobutton作为固定环,ultrabbutton作为可调节环。这些设备经过了预处理;施加50-250 N的循环载荷1000次,最终以50 mm/min的速度拉至失效。在伸长率、极限强度和刚度方面测试了这些装置的生物力学性能。结果:尼斯结和Endobutton之间的极限强度和位移差异是显著的(p结论:尼斯结系在按钮上的性能与ultrabbutton具有相似的位移和刚度特征。然而,其最大极限强度(838±28 N)明显低于两种测试装置。尽管如此,它仍然优于患者在ACL康复初期所经历的生理力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信