Open-source quality assurance for multi-parametric MRI: a diffusion analysis update for the magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS).
IF 2.5 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
James C Korte, Stanley A Norris, Madeline E Carr, Lois Holloway, Glenn D Cahoon, Ben Neijndorff, Petra van Houdt, Rick Franich
{"title":"Open-source quality assurance for multi-parametric MRI: a diffusion analysis update for the magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS).","authors":"James C Korte, Stanley A Norris, Madeline E Carr, Lois Holloway, Glenn D Cahoon, Ben Neijndorff, Petra van Houdt, Rick Franich","doi":"10.1007/s10334-025-01252-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the automated analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion phantoms with an updated version of the magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS), an open-source tool initially developed for the analysis of MRI relaxometry phantoms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The updated MR-BIAS was validated against two published diffusion weighted MRI datasets: (i) a single-site study (n = 48) was used for validation of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and to identify optimal region of interest (ROI) selection, and (ii) a multi-centre multi-vendor study including diffusion imaging from a shared benchmark protocol (n = 49) and site-specific protocols (n = 43). ADC analysis compared both datasets with ROIs manually matched to the original studies, and with automatically detected optimal ROIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MR-BIAS ADC values were statistically equivalent (p < 0.05) to original studies within tolerances (manual ROI, automatic ROI) for the single-site study (± 0.01, ± 6 μm<sup>2</sup>/s) and for the multi-vendor study for benchmark (± 4, ± 7 μm<sup>2</sup>/s) and site-specific (± 3, ± 6 μm<sup>2</sup>/s) protocols. The optimal ROI was a central cylinder (height = 10mm, diameter = 10mm). MR-BIAS ADC summary metrics were comparable to those of the original studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>MR-BIAS can automatically and accurately perform ADC analysis of diffusion phantoms, making the software suitable for the quality assurance of multi-centre studies of multi-parametric MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"639-651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-025-01252-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To validate the automated analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion phantoms with an updated version of the magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS), an open-source tool initially developed for the analysis of MRI relaxometry phantoms.
Materials and methods: The updated MR-BIAS was validated against two published diffusion weighted MRI datasets: (i) a single-site study (n = 48) was used for validation of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and to identify optimal region of interest (ROI) selection, and (ii) a multi-centre multi-vendor study including diffusion imaging from a shared benchmark protocol (n = 49) and site-specific protocols (n = 43). ADC analysis compared both datasets with ROIs manually matched to the original studies, and with automatically detected optimal ROIs.
Results: MR-BIAS ADC values were statistically equivalent (p < 0.05) to original studies within tolerances (manual ROI, automatic ROI) for the single-site study (± 0.01, ± 6 μm2/s) and for the multi-vendor study for benchmark (± 4, ± 7 μm2/s) and site-specific (± 3, ± 6 μm2/s) protocols. The optimal ROI was a central cylinder (height = 10mm, diameter = 10mm). MR-BIAS ADC summary metrics were comparable to those of the original studies.
Discussion: MR-BIAS can automatically and accurately perform ADC analysis of diffusion phantoms, making the software suitable for the quality assurance of multi-centre studies of multi-parametric MRI.
期刊介绍:
MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include:
advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology,
new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine,
study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance,
reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.