Lajjaben Patel, Matthew W. Segar, Muhammad S. Usman, Ritika Dhruve, Neil Keshvani, Alexander Postalian, Amgad Mentias, Craig D. Rubin, Kershaw V. Patel, Dharam J. Kumbhani, Subhash Banerjee, Ambarish Pandey
{"title":"Frailty Burden and Efficacy of Initial Invasive Strategy in Chronic Coronary Disease: The ISCHEMIA Trials","authors":"Lajjaben Patel, Matthew W. Segar, Muhammad S. Usman, Ritika Dhruve, Neil Keshvani, Alexander Postalian, Amgad Mentias, Craig D. Rubin, Kershaw V. Patel, Dharam J. Kumbhani, Subhash Banerjee, Ambarish Pandey","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Frailty is common among patients with chronic coronary disease and is associated with worse outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A pooled, post hoc analysis of the ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD trials was conducted. Baseline frailty was assessed using a Frailty Index (FI), and participants were categorized into data-derived tertiles. Multivariable Cox models with multiplicative interaction terms (frailty × treatment arm) were constructed to evaluate whether baseline frailty status modified the treatment effect of the initial invasive (vs conservative) strategy on a composite outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest and the secondary outcome of HRQoL (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 5322 participants (mean 64 years, 24% female), a high frailty burden (tertile 3 vs. tertile 1) was associated with lower baseline SAQ scores and increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes on follow-up. Baseline frailty burden did not significantly modify the effect of the initial invasive strategy on the primary composite outcome (<i>P</i>\n <sub>interaction</sub>frailty × intervention arm = 0.30). However, frailty significantly modified the effect of the initial invasive strategy on HRQoL, with higher baseline frailty burden associated with greater improvement in SAQ scores at 1 year with initial invasive (vs. conservative) treatment (<i>P</i>\n <sub>interaction</sub>frailty × intervention arm < 0.001). The treatment effect of an initial invasive vs. conservative strategy on 12-month SAQ score change was most pronounced in individuals with lower baseline SAQ scores in both higher and lower frailty burden groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with chronic coronary disease with a higher frailty burden are more likely to experience greater improvements in HRQoL with initial invasive management without a higher risk of adverse clinical events. Lower baseline SAQ scores predicted greater improvement in HRQoL with initial invasive management, independent of frailty burden.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 8","pages":"2376-2385"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Frailty is common among patients with chronic coronary disease and is associated with worse outcomes.
Methods
A pooled, post hoc analysis of the ISCHEMIA and ISCHEMIA-CKD trials was conducted. Baseline frailty was assessed using a Frailty Index (FI), and participants were categorized into data-derived tertiles. Multivariable Cox models with multiplicative interaction terms (frailty × treatment arm) were constructed to evaluate whether baseline frailty status modified the treatment effect of the initial invasive (vs conservative) strategy on a composite outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest and the secondary outcome of HRQoL (Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]).
Results
Among 5322 participants (mean 64 years, 24% female), a high frailty burden (tertile 3 vs. tertile 1) was associated with lower baseline SAQ scores and increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes on follow-up. Baseline frailty burden did not significantly modify the effect of the initial invasive strategy on the primary composite outcome (Pinteractionfrailty × intervention arm = 0.30). However, frailty significantly modified the effect of the initial invasive strategy on HRQoL, with higher baseline frailty burden associated with greater improvement in SAQ scores at 1 year with initial invasive (vs. conservative) treatment (Pinteractionfrailty × intervention arm < 0.001). The treatment effect of an initial invasive vs. conservative strategy on 12-month SAQ score change was most pronounced in individuals with lower baseline SAQ scores in both higher and lower frailty burden groups.
Conclusion
Patients with chronic coronary disease with a higher frailty burden are more likely to experience greater improvements in HRQoL with initial invasive management without a higher risk of adverse clinical events. Lower baseline SAQ scores predicted greater improvement in HRQoL with initial invasive management, independent of frailty burden.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.