Mainstream Smart Home Technology-Based Intervention to Enhance Functional Independence in Individuals With Complex Physical Disabilities: Single-Group Pre-Post Feasibility Study.

Q2 Medicine
Dan Ding, Lindsey Morris, Gina Novario, Andrea Fairman, Kacey Roehrich, Palma Foschi Walko, Jessica Boateng
{"title":"Mainstream Smart Home Technology-Based Intervention to Enhance Functional Independence in Individuals With Complex Physical Disabilities: Single-Group Pre-Post Feasibility Study.","authors":"Dan Ding, Lindsey Morris, Gina Novario, Andrea Fairman, Kacey Roehrich, Palma Foschi Walko, Jessica Boateng","doi":"10.2196/70855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mainstream smart home technologies (MSHTs), such as home automation devices and smart speakers, are becoming more powerful, affordable, and integrated into daily life. While not designed for individuals with disabilities, MSHT has the potential to serve as assistive technology to enhance their independence and participation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to describe a comprehensive MSHT-based intervention named ASSIST (Autonomy, Safety, and Social Integration via Smart Technologies) and evaluate its feasibility in enhancing the functional independence of individuals with complex physical disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ASSIST is a time-limited intervention with a design based on the human activity assistive technology model, emphasizing client-centered goals and prioritizing individual needs. The intervention follows a structured assistive technology service delivery process that includes 2 assessment sessions to determine technology recommendations, installation and setup of the recommended technology, and up to 8 training sessions. An occupational therapist led the intervention, supported by a contractor and a technologist. Feasibility was evaluated through several measures: (1) the ASSIST Functional Performance Index, which quantifies the number of tasks transitioned from requiring assistance to independent completion and from higher levels of assistance or effort to lower levels; (2) pre- and postintervention measures of perceived task performance and satisfaction using a 10-point scale; (3) the number and types of tasks successfully addressed, along with the costs of devices and installation services; and (4) training effectiveness using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 17 powered wheelchair users with complex physical disabilities completed the study with 100% session attendance. Across participants, 127 tasks were addressed, with 2 to 10 tasks at an average cost of US $3308 (SD US $1192) per participant. Of these tasks, 95 (74.8%) transitioned from requiring partial or complete assistance to independent completion, while 24 (18.9%) either improved from requiring complete to partial assistance or, if originally performed independently, required reduced effort. Only 8 (6.3%) tasks showed no changes. All training goals, except for 2, were achieved at or above the expected level, with a baseline average GAS score of 22.6 (SD 3.5) and a posttraining average GAS score of 77.2 (SD 4.5). Perceived task performance and satisfaction showed significant improvement, with performance score increasing from a baseline mean of 2.6 (SD 1.2) to 8.8 (SD 1.0; P<.001) and satisfaction score rising from an average of 2.9 (SD 1.3) to 9.0 (SD 0.9; P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ASSIST intervention demonstrated the immediate benefits of enhancing functional independence and satisfaction with MSHT among individuals with complex physical disabilities. While MSHT shows promise in addressing daily living needs at lower costs, barriers such as digital literacy, device setup, and caregiver involvement remain. Future work should focus on scalable models, caregiver engagement, and sustainable solutions for real-world implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36224,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","volume":"12 ","pages":"e70855"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/70855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mainstream smart home technologies (MSHTs), such as home automation devices and smart speakers, are becoming more powerful, affordable, and integrated into daily life. While not designed for individuals with disabilities, MSHT has the potential to serve as assistive technology to enhance their independence and participation.

Objective: The study aims to describe a comprehensive MSHT-based intervention named ASSIST (Autonomy, Safety, and Social Integration via Smart Technologies) and evaluate its feasibility in enhancing the functional independence of individuals with complex physical disabilities.

Methods: ASSIST is a time-limited intervention with a design based on the human activity assistive technology model, emphasizing client-centered goals and prioritizing individual needs. The intervention follows a structured assistive technology service delivery process that includes 2 assessment sessions to determine technology recommendations, installation and setup of the recommended technology, and up to 8 training sessions. An occupational therapist led the intervention, supported by a contractor and a technologist. Feasibility was evaluated through several measures: (1) the ASSIST Functional Performance Index, which quantifies the number of tasks transitioned from requiring assistance to independent completion and from higher levels of assistance or effort to lower levels; (2) pre- and postintervention measures of perceived task performance and satisfaction using a 10-point scale; (3) the number and types of tasks successfully addressed, along with the costs of devices and installation services; and (4) training effectiveness using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS).

Results: In total, 17 powered wheelchair users with complex physical disabilities completed the study with 100% session attendance. Across participants, 127 tasks were addressed, with 2 to 10 tasks at an average cost of US $3308 (SD US $1192) per participant. Of these tasks, 95 (74.8%) transitioned from requiring partial or complete assistance to independent completion, while 24 (18.9%) either improved from requiring complete to partial assistance or, if originally performed independently, required reduced effort. Only 8 (6.3%) tasks showed no changes. All training goals, except for 2, were achieved at or above the expected level, with a baseline average GAS score of 22.6 (SD 3.5) and a posttraining average GAS score of 77.2 (SD 4.5). Perceived task performance and satisfaction showed significant improvement, with performance score increasing from a baseline mean of 2.6 (SD 1.2) to 8.8 (SD 1.0; P<.001) and satisfaction score rising from an average of 2.9 (SD 1.3) to 9.0 (SD 0.9; P<.001).

Conclusions: The ASSIST intervention demonstrated the immediate benefits of enhancing functional independence and satisfaction with MSHT among individuals with complex physical disabilities. While MSHT shows promise in addressing daily living needs at lower costs, barriers such as digital literacy, device setup, and caregiver involvement remain. Future work should focus on scalable models, caregiver engagement, and sustainable solutions for real-world implementation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于主流智能家居技术的干预提高复杂肢体残疾个体的功能独立性:单组前后可行性研究
背景:主流智能家居技术(msht),如家庭自动化设备和智能扬声器,正变得越来越强大,价格实惠,并融入日常生活。虽然不是为残疾人设计的,但MSHT有可能作为辅助技术来增强他们的独立性和参与度。目的:本研究旨在描述一种基于msht的综合干预措施,名为ASSIST(自主性、安全性和社会整合通过智能技术),并评估其在增强复杂身体残疾个体功能独立性方面的可行性。方法:ASSIST是一种基于人类活动辅助技术模型设计的限时干预,强调以客户为中心的目标和优先考虑个人需求。干预遵循结构化的辅助技术服务交付过程,其中包括2次评估会议,以确定技术建议,建议技术的安装和设置,以及多达8次培训会议。在一名承包商和一名技术专家的支持下,一名职业治疗师领导了这次干预。可行性通过以下几个指标进行评估:(1)ASSIST功能绩效指数(ASSIST Functional Performance Index),该指数量化了从需要协助到独立完成、从较高水平的协助或努力到较低水平的任务的数量;(2)采用10分制测量干预前后的感知任务绩效和满意度;(3)成功解决的任务的数量和类型,以及设备和安装服务的成本;(4)利用目标实现量表(GAS)评估培训效果。结果:总共有17名患有复杂身体残疾的电动轮椅使用者以100%的出勤率完成了研究。在所有参与者中,解决了127项任务,其中2至10项任务的平均成本为每位参与者3308美元(1192美元)。在这些任务中,95个(74.8%)从需要部分或完全协助过渡到独立完成,而24个(18.9%)从需要完全或部分协助改进到部分协助,或者如果最初独立执行,则需要减少工作量。只有8个(6.3%)任务没有变化。除2外,所有训练目标均达到或高于预期水平,基线平均GAS评分为22.6 (SD 3.5),训练后平均GAS评分为77.2 (SD 4.5)。感知任务绩效和满意度有显著改善,绩效得分从基线平均值2.6 (SD 1.2)增加到8.8 (SD 1.0);结论:ASSIST干预在增强复杂肢体残疾患者的功能独立性和MSHT满意度方面显示了直接的益处。虽然MSHT有望以较低的成本解决日常生活需求,但诸如数字素养、设备设置和护理人员参与等障碍仍然存在。未来的工作应侧重于可扩展模型、护理人员参与和现实世界实施的可持续解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信