Can ChatGPT detect breast cancer on mammography?

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Medical Screening Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1177/09691413251334587
Deniz Esin Tekcan Sanli, Ahmet Necati Sanli, Duzgun Yildirim, Ilkay Dogan
{"title":"Can ChatGPT detect breast cancer on mammography?","authors":"Deniz Esin Tekcan Sanli, Ahmet Necati Sanli, Duzgun Yildirim, Ilkay Dogan","doi":"10.1177/09691413251334587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some noteworthy studies have questioned the use of ChatGPT, a free artificial intelligence program that has become very popular and widespread in recent times, in different branches of medicine. In this study, the success of ChatGPT in detecting breast cancer on mammography (MMG) was evaluated. The pre-treatment mammographic images of patients with a histopathological diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma and prominent mass formation on MMG were read separately into two ChatGPT subprograms: Radiologist Report Writer (P1) and XrayGPT (P2). The programs were asked to determine mammographic breast density, tumor size, side, and quadrant, the presence of microcalcification, distortion, skin or nipple changes, and axillary lymphadenopathy (LAP), and BI-RADS score. The responses were evaluated in consensus by two experienced radiologists. Although the mass detection rate of both programs was over 60%, the success in determining breast density, tumor size and localization, microcalcification, distortion, skin or nipple changes, and axillary LAP was low. BI-RADS category agreement with readers was fair for P1 (κ:28%, 0.20< κ ≤ 0.40) and moderate for P2 (κ:58%, 0.40< κ ≤ 0.60). In conclusion, while the XrayGPT application can detect breast cancer with a mass appearance on MMG images better than the Radiologist Report Writer application, the success of both is low in detecting all other related features. This casts doubt over the suitability of current large language models for image analysis in breast screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"172-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251334587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some noteworthy studies have questioned the use of ChatGPT, a free artificial intelligence program that has become very popular and widespread in recent times, in different branches of medicine. In this study, the success of ChatGPT in detecting breast cancer on mammography (MMG) was evaluated. The pre-treatment mammographic images of patients with a histopathological diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma and prominent mass formation on MMG were read separately into two ChatGPT subprograms: Radiologist Report Writer (P1) and XrayGPT (P2). The programs were asked to determine mammographic breast density, tumor size, side, and quadrant, the presence of microcalcification, distortion, skin or nipple changes, and axillary lymphadenopathy (LAP), and BI-RADS score. The responses were evaluated in consensus by two experienced radiologists. Although the mass detection rate of both programs was over 60%, the success in determining breast density, tumor size and localization, microcalcification, distortion, skin or nipple changes, and axillary LAP was low. BI-RADS category agreement with readers was fair for P1 (κ:28%, 0.20< κ ≤ 0.40) and moderate for P2 (κ:58%, 0.40< κ ≤ 0.60). In conclusion, while the XrayGPT application can detect breast cancer with a mass appearance on MMG images better than the Radiologist Report Writer application, the success of both is low in detecting all other related features. This casts doubt over the suitability of current large language models for image analysis in breast screening.

ChatGPT能在乳房x光检查中发现乳腺癌吗?
一些值得注意的研究对ChatGPT的使用提出了质疑,ChatGPT是一种免费的人工智能程序,近年来在医学的不同分支中变得非常流行和广泛。本研究对ChatGPT在乳腺x线摄影(MMG)上检测乳腺癌的成功率进行了评价。组织病理学诊断为浸润性乳腺癌和MMG上明显肿块形成的患者的治疗前乳房x线摄影图像分别读取为两个ChatGPT子程序:Radiologist Report Writer (P1)和XrayGPT (P2)。这些程序被要求确定乳腺密度、肿瘤大小、侧面和象限、微钙化、变形、皮肤或乳头改变、腋窝淋巴结病(LAP)的存在,以及BI-RADS评分。这些反应由两位经验丰富的放射科医生一致评估。虽然两种方案的肿块检出率均在60%以上,但在确定乳腺密度、肿瘤大小和定位、微钙化、变形、皮肤或乳头改变和腋窝LAP方面的成功率较低。P1与读者的BI-RADS分类一致性一般(κ:28%, 0.20< κ≤0.40),P2与读者的BI-RADS分类一致性中等(κ:58%, 0.40< κ≤0.60)。总之,虽然XrayGPT应用程序可以比Radiologist Report Writer应用程序更好地检测MMG图像上肿块外观的乳腺癌,但两者在检测所有其他相关特征方面的成功率较低。这使人们对目前大型语言模型在乳腺筛查中图像分析的适用性产生了怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信