Genetic testing results of retinal dystrophies in a diverse population: impact of race and ethnicity.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ophthalmic Genetics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1080/13816810.2024.2446549
Charles Miller, Brenda L Bohnsack, Andy Drackley, Alexander Ing, Safa Rahmani, Hantamalala Ralay Ranaivo, Valerie Allegretti, Jennifer L Rossen
{"title":"Genetic testing results of retinal dystrophies in a diverse population: impact of race and ethnicity.","authors":"Charles Miller, Brenda L Bohnsack, Andy Drackley, Alexander Ing, Safa Rahmani, Hantamalala Ralay Ranaivo, Valerie Allegretti, Jennifer L Rossen","doi":"10.1080/13816810.2024.2446549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to the recent advent of gene-targeted retinal therapies, the clinical value of high-yield genetic testing for inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) has increased considerably. However, diagnostic yield is limited by the reported patient populations in allele frequency databases. This study aimed to determine the effect of race and ethnicity on diagnostic yield in IRDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of individuals with suspected IRD based on clinical findings or diagnosis of associated syndrome who underwent genetic testing between 2009 and 2021. Self-reported race and ethnicity, ophthalmic examination findings, ERG results, and genetic testing findings were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 93 individuals (90 families) with suspected IRD, the diagnostic yield was 72% (67 individuals). The rate of diagnostic yield was not significantly associated with family history, associated syndromes, age at testing, ERG results, or ophthalmic exam findings. Further, higher rates of positive diagnostic yield were not associated with more recent genetic testing. There was a trend toward differences in diagnostic yield between races (77% White, 65% Other, 64% Asian, 50% Black) and ratio of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants to variants of unknown significance (46%:54% White, 36%:64% Other, 31%:69% Asian, 30%:70% Black).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current genetic testing for IRDs trends toward higher diagnostic yield and identification of P/LP variants in patients identifying as White compared to other races. In order to prevent negative impacts on access to gene-targeted trials and treatments for non-White patients, wider genetic testing in diverse populations is required to create comprehensive catalogs of gene variants associated with IRDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19594,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Genetics","volume":"46 2","pages":"160-165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13816810.2024.2446549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the recent advent of gene-targeted retinal therapies, the clinical value of high-yield genetic testing for inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) has increased considerably. However, diagnostic yield is limited by the reported patient populations in allele frequency databases. This study aimed to determine the effect of race and ethnicity on diagnostic yield in IRDs.

Methods: Retrospective review of individuals with suspected IRD based on clinical findings or diagnosis of associated syndrome who underwent genetic testing between 2009 and 2021. Self-reported race and ethnicity, ophthalmic examination findings, ERG results, and genetic testing findings were collected and analyzed.

Results: In 93 individuals (90 families) with suspected IRD, the diagnostic yield was 72% (67 individuals). The rate of diagnostic yield was not significantly associated with family history, associated syndromes, age at testing, ERG results, or ophthalmic exam findings. Further, higher rates of positive diagnostic yield were not associated with more recent genetic testing. There was a trend toward differences in diagnostic yield between races (77% White, 65% Other, 64% Asian, 50% Black) and ratio of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants to variants of unknown significance (46%:54% White, 36%:64% Other, 31%:69% Asian, 30%:70% Black).

Conclusions: Current genetic testing for IRDs trends toward higher diagnostic yield and identification of P/LP variants in patients identifying as White compared to other races. In order to prevent negative impacts on access to gene-targeted trials and treatments for non-White patients, wider genetic testing in diverse populations is required to create comprehensive catalogs of gene variants associated with IRDs.

不同人群视网膜营养不良症的基因检测结果:种族和民族的影响。
导读:由于近年来基因靶向视网膜治疗的出现,遗传性视网膜营养不良症(IRDs)的高产基因检测的临床价值大大增加。然而,诊断率受到等位基因频率数据库中报告的患者群体的限制。本研究旨在确定种族和民族对ird诊断产率的影响。方法:回顾性分析2009年至2021年间接受基因检测的基于临床表现或相关综合征诊断的疑似IRD患者。收集和分析自我报告的种族和民族、眼科检查结果、ERG结果和基因检测结果。结果:93例(90个家庭)疑似IRD患者的诊断率为72%(67例)。诊断率与家族史、相关综合征、检测年龄、ERG结果或眼科检查结果无显著相关性。此外,较高的阳性诊断率与最近的基因检测无关。不同种族之间的诊断率(白人77%,其他人种65%,亚洲人64%,黑人50%)和致病/可能致病(P/LP)变异与未知意义变异的比率(白人46%:54%,其他人种36%:64%,亚洲人31%:69%,黑人30%:70%)存在差异的趋势。结论:与其他种族相比,目前对IRDs的基因检测倾向于更高的诊断率和识别白人患者的P/LP变异。为了防止对非白人患者获得基因靶向试验和治疗的负面影响,需要在不同人群中进行更广泛的基因检测,以创建与ird相关的基因变异的综合目录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmic Genetics
Ophthalmic Genetics 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
126
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Genetics accepts original papers, review articles and short communications on the clinical and molecular genetic aspects of ocular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信