Effectiveness of Silent Mentor Program (SMP) Workshop on Enhancing Confidence in Surgical Skills.

IF 0.6 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
L P Wong, H Alias, S L Tan, S L Khaing, T E Sia, A Saw
{"title":"Effectiveness of Silent Mentor Program (SMP) Workshop on Enhancing Confidence in Surgical Skills.","authors":"L P Wong, H Alias, S L Tan, S L Khaing, T E Sia, A Saw","doi":"10.5704/MOJ.2503.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation-based surgical skills workshops using 'Silent Mentors' are employed in numerous surgical training programs worldwide, yet empirical evidence on their effectiveness remains limited. The objective of this study was to investigate whether participation in the surgical skills workshop within the Silent Mentor Program (SMP) resulted in an improvement in the surgical skills of the workshop attendees.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Participants in the SMP at Universiti Malaya during the period from May 15, 2022, to September 24, 2023, were included in the study. Participants self-evaluated their surgical skill confidence levels in four fundamental surgical skills (chest tube insertion, central venous line insertion, endotracheal intubation, and skin suturing). The pre-workshop confidence scores were assessed and compared with immediate post-workshop scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings demonstrated that after the training, participants exhibited higher confidence in all four fundamental surgical skills. Skin suturing demonstrated the highest total confidence score post-workshop, with a median of 21 and an interquartile range (IQR) of 18-24. Endotracheal intubation and chest tube insertion followed closely, both with a median of 19. Conversely, central line insertion displayed the lowest total confidence score, registering a median of 18 (IQR=16-21). No statistically significant differences were observed in the confidence level scores for chest tube insertion, central line insertion, and endotracheal intubation between pre- and post-workshop assessments across all demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, utilizing silent mentors in surgical skills training enhances proficiency in all four fundamental surgical skills, with skin suturing demonstrating particularly noteworthy improvements. The consistent confidence levels across demographic factors suggest the workshop's effectiveness across a broad spectrum of participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":45241,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2503.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Simulation-based surgical skills workshops using 'Silent Mentors' are employed in numerous surgical training programs worldwide, yet empirical evidence on their effectiveness remains limited. The objective of this study was to investigate whether participation in the surgical skills workshop within the Silent Mentor Program (SMP) resulted in an improvement in the surgical skills of the workshop attendees.

Material and methods: Participants in the SMP at Universiti Malaya during the period from May 15, 2022, to September 24, 2023, were included in the study. Participants self-evaluated their surgical skill confidence levels in four fundamental surgical skills (chest tube insertion, central venous line insertion, endotracheal intubation, and skin suturing). The pre-workshop confidence scores were assessed and compared with immediate post-workshop scores.

Results: The findings demonstrated that after the training, participants exhibited higher confidence in all four fundamental surgical skills. Skin suturing demonstrated the highest total confidence score post-workshop, with a median of 21 and an interquartile range (IQR) of 18-24. Endotracheal intubation and chest tube insertion followed closely, both with a median of 19. Conversely, central line insertion displayed the lowest total confidence score, registering a median of 18 (IQR=16-21). No statistically significant differences were observed in the confidence level scores for chest tube insertion, central line insertion, and endotracheal intubation between pre- and post-workshop assessments across all demographic characteristics.

Conclusion: In conclusion, utilizing silent mentors in surgical skills training enhances proficiency in all four fundamental surgical skills, with skin suturing demonstrating particularly noteworthy improvements. The consistent confidence levels across demographic factors suggest the workshop's effectiveness across a broad spectrum of participants.

沉默导师计划(SMP)提高手术技能信心研讨会的有效性。
简介:使用“沉默导师”的基于模拟的外科技能研讨会在世界各地的许多外科培训项目中使用,但其有效性的经验证据仍然有限。本研究的目的是调查参与沉默导师计划(SMP)的手术技能研讨会是否能提高研讨会参与者的手术技能。材料和方法:研究纳入了2022年5月15日至2023年9月24日期间在马来亚大学参加SMP的参与者。参与者自我评估四项基本手术技能(胸管插入、中心静脉线插入、气管插管和皮肤缝合)的手术技能信心水平。评估工作坊前的信心得分,并与工作坊后的得分进行比较。结果:研究结果表明,经过训练,参与者对所有四项基本手术技能都表现出更高的信心。皮肤缝合表现出最高的工作坊后总置信度评分,中位数为21,四分位数范围(IQR)为18-24。气管插管和胸管置入紧随其后,中位数均为19。相反,中心线插入显示最低的总置信度评分,登记的中位数为18 (IQR=16-21)。在所有人口统计学特征的研讨会前后评估中,胸管插入、中心线插入和气管插管的置信度评分没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:总之,在手术技能培训中使用沉默导师可以提高四种基本手术技能的熟练程度,其中皮肤缝合的改善尤为显著。人口统计因素的一致置信水平表明讲习班在广泛的参与者中是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers and case reports three times a year in both printed and electronic version. The purpose of MOJ is to disseminate new knowledge and provide updates in Orthopaedics, trauma and musculoskeletal research. It is an Open Access journal that does not require processing fee or article processing charge from the authors. The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is the official journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA) and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association (AOA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信