Biomarkers in Cervical Squamous Neoplasia: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive.

Anne M Mills
{"title":"Biomarkers in Cervical Squamous Neoplasia: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive.","authors":"Anne M Mills","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0448-RA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Cervical squamous neoplasia runs the gamut from low-risk intraepithelial processes to aggressive invasive malignancies. A variety of biomarkers can be enlisted to help diagnose, prognosticate, and inform treatment of these lesions. There are ongoing controversies about diagnostic and prognostic biomarker use in squamous intraepithelial lesions, and many pathologists are new to predictive biomarker interpretation in invasive cervical lesions.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To provide practical guidance on the appropriate use of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinomas.</p><p><strong>Data sources.—: </strong>Peer-reviewed literature and the author's personal experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Diagnostic biomarkers such as p16 and human papillomavirus E6/E7 messenger RNA in situ hybridization can have value in the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial neoplasia, but there are important caveats to their use and interpretation. No prognostic biomarkers have yet demonstrated statistically durable significance for risk stratification of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry and tumor mutational burden testing are US Food & Drug Administration-approved predictive biomarkers that can be enlisted for the identification of invasive cervical squamous carcinomas that may respond to checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy, whereas human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry can identify optimal candidates for conjugated anti-HER2 therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0448-RA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Cervical squamous neoplasia runs the gamut from low-risk intraepithelial processes to aggressive invasive malignancies. A variety of biomarkers can be enlisted to help diagnose, prognosticate, and inform treatment of these lesions. There are ongoing controversies about diagnostic and prognostic biomarker use in squamous intraepithelial lesions, and many pathologists are new to predictive biomarker interpretation in invasive cervical lesions.

Objective.—: To provide practical guidance on the appropriate use of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinomas.

Data sources.—: Peer-reviewed literature and the author's personal experience.

Conclusions.—: Diagnostic biomarkers such as p16 and human papillomavirus E6/E7 messenger RNA in situ hybridization can have value in the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial neoplasia, but there are important caveats to their use and interpretation. No prognostic biomarkers have yet demonstrated statistically durable significance for risk stratification of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry and tumor mutational burden testing are US Food & Drug Administration-approved predictive biomarkers that can be enlisted for the identification of invasive cervical squamous carcinomas that may respond to checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy, whereas human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry can identify optimal candidates for conjugated anti-HER2 therapies.

宫颈鳞状瘤变的生物标志物:诊断、预后和预测。
上下文。-:宫颈鳞状瘤变的范围从低风险上皮内病变到侵袭性侵袭性恶性肿瘤。各种各样的生物标志物可以用来帮助诊断、预测和告知这些病变的治疗。关于生物标志物在宫颈鳞状上皮内病变中的诊断和预后应用一直存在争议,许多病理学家对浸润性宫颈病变中生物标志物的预测解释尚不熟悉。-:为宫颈鳞状上皮内病变和浸润性癌的诊断、预后和预测性生物标志物的适当使用提供实用指导。数据源。-:同行评议的文献和作者的个人经历。-:诊断性生物标志物,如p16和人乳头瘤病毒E6/E7信使RNA原位杂交在鳞状上皮内瘤变的诊断中具有价值,但对其使用和解释有重要的注意事项。目前还没有预后生物标志物在低级别鳞状上皮内病变的风险分层中显示出统计学上持久的意义。程序性死亡配体-1免疫组织化学和肿瘤突变负担测试是美国食品和药物管理局批准的预测性生物标志物,可用于识别可能对基于检查点抑制剂的免疫治疗有反应的侵袭性宫颈鳞状癌,而人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)免疫组织化学可以识别结合抗HER2治疗的最佳候选物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信