Knowledge Gaps in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy.

IF 2
Mustafa C Şenoymak, Nisa Babacanlar, Nuriye H Erbatur, Ferrat Deniz, Arif Yönem
{"title":"Knowledge Gaps in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy.","authors":"Mustafa C Şenoymak, Nisa Babacanlar, Nuriye H Erbatur, Ferrat Deniz, Arif Yönem","doi":"10.2174/0118715303364657250415115259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fine-needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) is the most accurate diagnostic method to assess the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. This study aims to assess the level of knowledge among patients regarding thyroid FNAB and its outcomes and to explore how this knowledge correlates with their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study at a tertiary healthcare facility's endocrinology and metabolism outpatient clinic, participants who had undergone their first thyroid FNAB and attended the clinic to review their results were included. Data collection encompassed demographic information, clinical history, and sonographic features of thyroid nodules. Patient knowledge was assessed using a 6-item questionnaire that evaluated awareness of the indications for thyroid FNAB, potential diagnostic outcomes, and the likelihood of a repeat biopsy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 423 patients participated in this study, with the majority being female (83.7%). The median age was 54 years. The indication for the biopsy was correctly identified by 68.5% of participants. Awareness of the potential for benign (85.1%) and malignant (84.6%) results was high. However, only 20.4% were informed about non-diagnostic outcomes and 16.6% about indeterminate results. Furthermore, 34.1% understood the need for a repeat biopsy. Participants under 65 years of age demonstrated significantly higher knowledge regarding the reason for the biopsy and the potential for benign or malignant results (p < 0.001). Participants with at least a high school education (38.1%) were more knowledgeable about all aspects of FNAB compared to those with lower educational levels (p < 0.05). Patients with a history of non-thyroidal malignancy (5.7%) demonstrated significantly greater understanding of non-diagnostic and indeterminate results (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveals substantial knowledge gaps, particularly in understanding thyroid FNAB and its outcomes. Thus, targeted educational interventions are necessary to enhance patient comprehension and improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94316,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715303364657250415115259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fine-needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) is the most accurate diagnostic method to assess the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. This study aims to assess the level of knowledge among patients regarding thyroid FNAB and its outcomes and to explore how this knowledge correlates with their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study at a tertiary healthcare facility's endocrinology and metabolism outpatient clinic, participants who had undergone their first thyroid FNAB and attended the clinic to review their results were included. Data collection encompassed demographic information, clinical history, and sonographic features of thyroid nodules. Patient knowledge was assessed using a 6-item questionnaire that evaluated awareness of the indications for thyroid FNAB, potential diagnostic outcomes, and the likelihood of a repeat biopsy.

Results: A total of 423 patients participated in this study, with the majority being female (83.7%). The median age was 54 years. The indication for the biopsy was correctly identified by 68.5% of participants. Awareness of the potential for benign (85.1%) and malignant (84.6%) results was high. However, only 20.4% were informed about non-diagnostic outcomes and 16.6% about indeterminate results. Furthermore, 34.1% understood the need for a repeat biopsy. Participants under 65 years of age demonstrated significantly higher knowledge regarding the reason for the biopsy and the potential for benign or malignant results (p < 0.001). Participants with at least a high school education (38.1%) were more knowledgeable about all aspects of FNAB compared to those with lower educational levels (p < 0.05). Patients with a history of non-thyroidal malignancy (5.7%) demonstrated significantly greater understanding of non-diagnostic and indeterminate results (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The study reveals substantial knowledge gaps, particularly in understanding thyroid FNAB and its outcomes. Thus, targeted educational interventions are necessary to enhance patient comprehension and improve clinical outcomes.

甲状腺细针穿刺活检患者的知识缺口。
背景:细针穿刺活检(FNAB)是评估甲状腺结节恶性风险最准确的诊断方法。本研究旨在评估患者关于甲状腺FNAB及其结果的知识水平,并探讨这些知识如何与他们的社会人口学和临床特征相关。方法:在一个三级医疗机构的内分泌和代谢门诊的横断面研究中,参与者接受了他们的第一次甲状腺FNAB,并到诊所检查他们的结果。资料收集包括甲状腺结节的人口统计资料、临床病史和超声特征。使用6项调查问卷评估患者对甲状腺FNAB适应症的认识、潜在的诊断结果和重复活检的可能性。结果:共纳入423例患者,其中女性居多(83.7%)。平均年龄为54岁。68.5%的参与者正确识别了活检的指征。对良性(85.1%)和恶性(84.6%)结果的认知度较高。然而,只有20.4%的患者被告知非诊断性结果,16.6%的患者被告知不确定的结果。此外,34.1%的患者理解需要再次活检。65岁以下的参与者对活检的原因和良性或恶性结果的可能性有更高的了解(p < 0.001)。与受教育程度较低的参与者相比,高中以上学历的参与者(38.1%)对FNAB各方面的了解程度更高(p < 0.05)。有非甲状腺恶性肿瘤病史的患者(5.7%)对非诊断性和不确定结果的理解程度显著提高(p < 0.001)。结论:该研究揭示了大量的知识空白,特别是在了解甲状腺FNAB及其预后方面。因此,有针对性的教育干预是必要的,以提高患者的理解和改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信