Prediction and Evaluation of Coronavirus and Human Protein-Protein Interactions Integrating Five Different Computational Methods.

IF 3.2 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Binghua Li, Xiaoyu Li, Xian Tang, Jia Wang
{"title":"Prediction and Evaluation of Coronavirus and Human Protein-Protein Interactions Integrating Five Different Computational Methods.","authors":"Binghua Li, Xiaoyu Li, Xian Tang, Jia Wang","doi":"10.1002/prot.26826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high lethality and infectiousness of coronaviruses, particularly SARS-Cov-2, pose a significant threat to human society. Understanding coronaviruses, especially the interactions between these viruses and humans, is crucial for mitigating the coronavirus pandemic. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparison and evaluation of five prevalent computational methods: interolog mapping, domain-domain interaction methodology, domain-motif interaction methodology, structure-based approaches, and machine learning techniques. These methods were assessed using unbiased datasets that include C1, C2h, C2v, and C3 test sets. Ultimately, we integrated these five methodologies into a unified model for predicting protein-protein interactions (PPIs) between coronaviruses and human proteins. Our final model demonstrates relatively better performance, particularly with the C2v and C3 test sets, which are frequently used datasets in practical applications. Based on this model, we further established a high-confidence PPI network between coronaviruses and humans, consisting of 18,012 interactions between 3843 human proteins and 129 coronavirus proteins. The reliability of our predictions was further validated through the current knowledge framework and network analysis. This study is anticipated to enhance mechanistic understanding of the coronavirus-human relationship a while facilitating the rediscovery of antiviral drug targets. The source codes and datasets are accessible at https://github.com/covhppilab/CoVHPPI.</p>","PeriodicalId":56271,"journal":{"name":"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high lethality and infectiousness of coronaviruses, particularly SARS-Cov-2, pose a significant threat to human society. Understanding coronaviruses, especially the interactions between these viruses and humans, is crucial for mitigating the coronavirus pandemic. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparison and evaluation of five prevalent computational methods: interolog mapping, domain-domain interaction methodology, domain-motif interaction methodology, structure-based approaches, and machine learning techniques. These methods were assessed using unbiased datasets that include C1, C2h, C2v, and C3 test sets. Ultimately, we integrated these five methodologies into a unified model for predicting protein-protein interactions (PPIs) between coronaviruses and human proteins. Our final model demonstrates relatively better performance, particularly with the C2v and C3 test sets, which are frequently used datasets in practical applications. Based on this model, we further established a high-confidence PPI network between coronaviruses and humans, consisting of 18,012 interactions between 3843 human proteins and 129 coronavirus proteins. The reliability of our predictions was further validated through the current knowledge framework and network analysis. This study is anticipated to enhance mechanistic understanding of the coronavirus-human relationship a while facilitating the rediscovery of antiviral drug targets. The source codes and datasets are accessible at https://github.com/covhppilab/CoVHPPI.

冠状病毒与人类蛋白质相互作用的预测与评价——整合五种不同计算方法
冠状病毒特别是SARS-Cov-2的高致死率和传染性对人类社会构成重大威胁。了解冠状病毒,特别是这些病毒与人类之间的相互作用,对于缓解冠状病毒大流行至关重要。在这项研究中,我们对五种流行的计算方法进行了全面的比较和评估:interolog mapping、domain-domain interaction methodology、domain-motif interaction methodology、基于结构的方法和机器学习技术。这些方法使用无偏数据集进行评估,包括C1、C2h、C2v和C3测试集。最终,我们将这五种方法整合到一个统一的模型中,用于预测冠状病毒与人类蛋白质之间的蛋白质相互作用(PPIs)。我们的最终模型表现出相对更好的性能,特别是在实际应用中经常使用的C2v和C3测试集上。在此基础上,我们进一步建立了冠状病毒与人之间的高置信度PPI网络,该网络包含3843种人蛋白与129种冠状病毒蛋白之间的18012种相互作用。通过现有的知识框架和网络分析,进一步验证了我们预测的可靠性。该研究有望加强对冠状病毒与人类关系的机制理解,同时促进抗病毒药物靶点的重新发现。源代码和数据集可在https://github.com/covhppilab/CoVHPPI上访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: PROTEINS : Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics publishes original reports of significant experimental and analytic research in all areas of protein research: structure, function, computation, genetics, and design. The journal encourages reports that present new experimental or computational approaches for interpreting and understanding data from biophysical chemistry, structural studies of proteins and macromolecular assemblies, alterations of protein structure and function engineered through techniques of molecular biology and genetics, functional analyses under physiologic conditions, as well as the interactions of proteins with receptors, nucleic acids, or other specific ligands or substrates. Research in protein and peptide biochemistry directed toward synthesizing or characterizing molecules that simulate aspects of the activity of proteins, or that act as inhibitors of protein function, is also within the scope of PROTEINS. In addition to full-length reports, short communications (usually not more than 4 printed pages) and prediction reports are welcome. Reviews are typically by invitation; authors are encouraged to submit proposed topics for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信