Response estimation and system identification of dynamical systems via physics-informed neural networks.

IF 2 Q3 MECHANICS
Marcus Haywood-Alexander, Giacomo Arcieri, Antonios Kamariotis, Eleni Chatzi
{"title":"Response estimation and system identification of dynamical systems via physics-informed neural networks.","authors":"Marcus Haywood-Alexander, Giacomo Arcieri, Antonios Kamariotis, Eleni Chatzi","doi":"10.1186/s40323-025-00291-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accurate modelling of structural dynamics is crucial across numerous engineering applications, such as Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), structural design optimisation, and vibration control. Often, these models originate from physics-based principles and can be derived from corresponding governing equations, often of differential equation form. However, complex system characteristics, such as nonlinearities and energy dissipation mechanisms, often imply that such models are approximative and often imprecise. This challenge is further compounded in SHM, where sensor data is often sparse, making it difficult to fully observe the system's states. Or in an additional context, in inverse modelling from noisy full-field data, modelling assumptions are compounded in to the observation uncertainty approximation. To address these issues, this paper explores the use of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), a class of physics-enhanced machine learning (PEML) techniques, for the identification and estimation of dynamical systems. PINNs offer a unique advantage by embedding known physical laws directly into the neural network's loss function, allowing for simple embedding of complex phenomena, even in the presence of uncertainties. This study specifically investigates three key applications of PINNs: state estimation in systems with sparse sensing, joint state-parameter estimation, when both system response and parameters are unknown, and parameter estimation from full-field observation, within a Bayesian framework to quantify uncertainties. The results demonstrate that PINNs deliver an efficient tool across all aforementioned tasks, even in the presence of modelling errors. However, these errors tend to have a more significant impact on parameter estimation, as the optimization process must reconcile discrepancies between the prescribed model and the true system behavior. Despite these challenges, PINNs show promise in dynamical system modeling, offering a robust approach to handling model uncertainties.</p>","PeriodicalId":37424,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-025-00291-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accurate modelling of structural dynamics is crucial across numerous engineering applications, such as Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), structural design optimisation, and vibration control. Often, these models originate from physics-based principles and can be derived from corresponding governing equations, often of differential equation form. However, complex system characteristics, such as nonlinearities and energy dissipation mechanisms, often imply that such models are approximative and often imprecise. This challenge is further compounded in SHM, where sensor data is often sparse, making it difficult to fully observe the system's states. Or in an additional context, in inverse modelling from noisy full-field data, modelling assumptions are compounded in to the observation uncertainty approximation. To address these issues, this paper explores the use of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), a class of physics-enhanced machine learning (PEML) techniques, for the identification and estimation of dynamical systems. PINNs offer a unique advantage by embedding known physical laws directly into the neural network's loss function, allowing for simple embedding of complex phenomena, even in the presence of uncertainties. This study specifically investigates three key applications of PINNs: state estimation in systems with sparse sensing, joint state-parameter estimation, when both system response and parameters are unknown, and parameter estimation from full-field observation, within a Bayesian framework to quantify uncertainties. The results demonstrate that PINNs deliver an efficient tool across all aforementioned tasks, even in the presence of modelling errors. However, these errors tend to have a more significant impact on parameter estimation, as the optimization process must reconcile discrepancies between the prescribed model and the true system behavior. Despite these challenges, PINNs show promise in dynamical system modeling, offering a robust approach to handling model uncertainties.

基于物理信息神经网络的动态系统响应估计和系统辨识。
结构动力学的精确建模在许多工程应用中至关重要,例如结构健康监测(SHM)、结构设计优化和振动控制。通常,这些模型源于基于物理的原理,并且可以从相应的控制方程推导出来,通常是微分方程形式。然而,复杂的系统特性,如非线性和能量耗散机制,往往意味着这种模型是近似的,往往是不精确的。这一挑战在SHM中进一步复杂化,其中传感器数据通常是稀疏的,因此很难完全观察系统的状态。或者在另一种情况下,在嘈杂全场数据的逆建模中,建模假设与观测不确定性近似相结合。为了解决这些问题,本文探讨了物理信息神经网络(pinn)的使用,这是一类物理增强机器学习(PEML)技术,用于识别和估计动态系统。pinn提供了一个独特的优势,它将已知的物理定律直接嵌入到神经网络的损失函数中,允许简单地嵌入复杂的现象,即使存在不确定性。本研究专门研究了pinn的三个关键应用:稀疏感知系统的状态估计,当系统响应和参数都未知时的联合状态参数估计,以及在贝叶斯框架内从全场观测中进行的参数估计,以量化不确定性。结果表明,即使在存在建模错误的情况下,pin也可以在所有上述任务中提供有效的工具。然而,这些误差往往对参数估计有更大的影响,因为优化过程必须调和规定模型和真实系统行为之间的差异。尽管存在这些挑战,pinn在动态系统建模中显示出前景,提供了一种处理模型不确定性的鲁棒方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences
Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The research topics addressed by Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences (AMSES) cover the vast domain of the advanced modeling and simulation of materials, processes and structures governed by the laws of mechanics. The emphasis is on advanced and innovative modeling approaches and numerical strategies. The main objective is to describe the actual physics of large mechanical systems with complicated geometries as accurately as possible using complex, highly nonlinear and coupled multiphysics and multiscale models, and then to carry out simulations with these complex models as rapidly as possible. In other words, this research revolves around efficient numerical modeling along with model verification and validation. Therefore, the corresponding papers deal with advanced modeling and simulation, efficient optimization, inverse analysis, data-driven computation and simulation-based control. These challenging issues require multidisciplinary efforts – particularly in modeling, numerical analysis and computer science – which are treated in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信