{"title":"Verification of health-based guidance values for carbendazim.","authors":"Takako Iso, Takaaki Umano, Kei-Ichi Sugiyama, Kenichi Masumura, Mariko Matsumoto","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbendazim is registered on the Japanese positive list (PL) for food contact materials (food utensils, containers, and packaging; UCP). However, to ensure food safety, a dietary risk assessment of carbendazim is necessary. The safety of carbendazim has been evaluated by several risk assessment bodies, from which health-based guidance values (HBGVs) have been established, mainly based on the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) approach. However, as most of the reviewed studies were not conducted in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) or OECD test guidelines (TGs), they may not have fully met quality standards. Following the results of periodic re-evaluations, some HBGVs have been withdrawn owing to insufficient toxicological information. Therefore, we verified the HBGVs of carbendazim from the perspective of genotoxicity. The point of departure (PoD) for aneugenicity was calculated based on a dose-response analysis from in vivo micronucleus tests using the benchmark dose (BMD) approach. Overall, the HBGV based on the PoD of aneugenicity was comparable with the existing HBGV based on developmental toxicity tests in rats and rabbits using the NOAEL approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105839"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105839","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Carbendazim is registered on the Japanese positive list (PL) for food contact materials (food utensils, containers, and packaging; UCP). However, to ensure food safety, a dietary risk assessment of carbendazim is necessary. The safety of carbendazim has been evaluated by several risk assessment bodies, from which health-based guidance values (HBGVs) have been established, mainly based on the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) approach. However, as most of the reviewed studies were not conducted in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) or OECD test guidelines (TGs), they may not have fully met quality standards. Following the results of periodic re-evaluations, some HBGVs have been withdrawn owing to insufficient toxicological information. Therefore, we verified the HBGVs of carbendazim from the perspective of genotoxicity. The point of departure (PoD) for aneugenicity was calculated based on a dose-response analysis from in vivo micronucleus tests using the benchmark dose (BMD) approach. Overall, the HBGV based on the PoD of aneugenicity was comparable with the existing HBGV based on developmental toxicity tests in rats and rabbits using the NOAEL approach.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)