Verification of health-based guidance values for carbendazim.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Takako Iso, Takaaki Umano, Kei-Ichi Sugiyama, Kenichi Masumura, Mariko Matsumoto
{"title":"Verification of health-based guidance values for carbendazim.","authors":"Takako Iso, Takaaki Umano, Kei-Ichi Sugiyama, Kenichi Masumura, Mariko Matsumoto","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbendazim is registered on the Japanese positive list (PL) for food contact materials (food utensils, containers, and packaging; UCP). However, to ensure food safety, a dietary risk assessment of carbendazim is necessary. The safety of carbendazim has been evaluated by several risk assessment bodies, from which health-based guidance values (HBGVs) have been established, mainly based on the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) approach. However, as most of the reviewed studies were not conducted in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) or OECD test guidelines (TGs), they may not have fully met quality standards. Following the results of periodic re-evaluations, some HBGVs have been withdrawn owing to insufficient toxicological information. Therefore, we verified the HBGVs of carbendazim from the perspective of genotoxicity. The point of departure (PoD) for aneugenicity was calculated based on a dose-response analysis from in vivo micronucleus tests using the benchmark dose (BMD) approach. Overall, the HBGV based on the PoD of aneugenicity was comparable with the existing HBGV based on developmental toxicity tests in rats and rabbits using the NOAEL approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105839"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105839","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbendazim is registered on the Japanese positive list (PL) for food contact materials (food utensils, containers, and packaging; UCP). However, to ensure food safety, a dietary risk assessment of carbendazim is necessary. The safety of carbendazim has been evaluated by several risk assessment bodies, from which health-based guidance values (HBGVs) have been established, mainly based on the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) approach. However, as most of the reviewed studies were not conducted in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) or OECD test guidelines (TGs), they may not have fully met quality standards. Following the results of periodic re-evaluations, some HBGVs have been withdrawn owing to insufficient toxicological information. Therefore, we verified the HBGVs of carbendazim from the perspective of genotoxicity. The point of departure (PoD) for aneugenicity was calculated based on a dose-response analysis from in vivo micronucleus tests using the benchmark dose (BMD) approach. Overall, the HBGV based on the PoD of aneugenicity was comparable with the existing HBGV based on developmental toxicity tests in rats and rabbits using the NOAEL approach.

验证多菌灵基于健康的指导值。
多菌灵在日本食品接触材料(食品器具、容器和包装)的正面清单(PL)上注册;跟单信用证)。然而,为了确保食品安全,有必要对多菌灵进行膳食风险评估。多菌灵的安全性已由几个风险评估机构进行了评估,并由此建立了基于健康的指导值(HBGVs),主要基于未观察到的不良反应水平(NOAEL)方法。然而,由于大多数审查的研究没有按照良好实验室规范(GLP)或经合组织测试指南(tg)进行,它们可能没有完全达到质量标准。根据定期重新评估的结果,由于毒理学信息不足,一些乙肝病毒已被撤回。因此,我们从遗传毒性的角度验证了多菌灵的HBGVs。非生源性的起点(PoD)是基于使用基准剂量(BMD)方法的体内微核试验的剂量-反应分析计算的。总体而言,基于非生理性PoD的HBGV与使用NOAEL方法在大鼠和家兔中进行的基于发育毒性试验的现有HBGV具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信