Motivations and Preferences for Self-Sampled Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Average-and High-Risk Patients: An Exploratory Analysis.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2024.0180
Rebecca Morgis, Ashley Wong, Lisa M Witmer, Anne Kantner, Megan Mendez-Miller, Sarah I Ramirez, Mack T Ruffin, Jennifer L Moss
{"title":"Motivations and Preferences for Self-Sampled Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Average-and High-Risk Patients: An Exploratory Analysis.","authors":"Rebecca Morgis, Ashley Wong, Lisa M Witmer, Anne Kantner, Megan Mendez-Miller, Sarah I Ramirez, Mack T Ruffin, Jennifer L Moss","doi":"10.1089/whr.2024.0180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cervical cancer screening rates fall below national goals. At-home self-sampled tests for human papillomavirus (HPV) may improve screening rates. This study assesses the acceptability of self-sampled HPV testing with respect to motivating factors and preference among average-risk patients (undergoing routine screening) and high-risk patients (receiving follow-up care after abnormal screening results).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study sample consisted of 46 participants (female, ages 30-65), including average-risk (n = 35) and high-risk (n = 11) patients, who had already received clinician-collected cervical cancer screening. Participants completed a self-sampled HPV test and a survey. Motivators included cervical cancer screening facilitators, sexual history, health care factors, and feelings during self-sampled test. We analyzed the relationships between these constructs and test modality preference for their next cervical cancer screening (i.e., self-sampled HPV testing at home vs. other preference).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Few participants experienced negative feelings during self-sampled HPV testing (uncomfortable: 20%; anxious: 22%; and unpleasant: 15%). Overall, 57% of participants would prefer to complete a self-sampled HPV test at home for their next cervical cancer screening compared with other test options. Test modality preference for their next cervical cancer screening did not differ for average- versus high-risk patients, and it did not vary by any of the motivating factors we assessed (all <i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acceptability of self-sampled HPV testing at home is high, with little difference in attitudes observed across patient characteristics. These findings demonstrate that self-sampled HPV testing may be an effective tool for increasing cervical cancer screening, even among high-risk patients who have previously had abnormal screening results.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"6 1","pages":"377-383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cervical cancer screening rates fall below national goals. At-home self-sampled tests for human papillomavirus (HPV) may improve screening rates. This study assesses the acceptability of self-sampled HPV testing with respect to motivating factors and preference among average-risk patients (undergoing routine screening) and high-risk patients (receiving follow-up care after abnormal screening results).

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study sample consisted of 46 participants (female, ages 30-65), including average-risk (n = 35) and high-risk (n = 11) patients, who had already received clinician-collected cervical cancer screening. Participants completed a self-sampled HPV test and a survey. Motivators included cervical cancer screening facilitators, sexual history, health care factors, and feelings during self-sampled test. We analyzed the relationships between these constructs and test modality preference for their next cervical cancer screening (i.e., self-sampled HPV testing at home vs. other preference).

Results: Few participants experienced negative feelings during self-sampled HPV testing (uncomfortable: 20%; anxious: 22%; and unpleasant: 15%). Overall, 57% of participants would prefer to complete a self-sampled HPV test at home for their next cervical cancer screening compared with other test options. Test modality preference for their next cervical cancer screening did not differ for average- versus high-risk patients, and it did not vary by any of the motivating factors we assessed (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Acceptability of self-sampled HPV testing at home is high, with little difference in attitudes observed across patient characteristics. These findings demonstrate that self-sampled HPV testing may be an effective tool for increasing cervical cancer screening, even among high-risk patients who have previously had abnormal screening results.

动机和偏好自我抽样人乳头瘤病毒检测在平均和高风险患者:探索性分析。
目的:宫颈癌筛查率低于国家目标。人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的家庭自我抽样检测可能提高筛查率。本研究评估了在中等风险患者(接受常规筛查)和高危患者(在异常筛查结果后接受随访护理)中,自我抽样HPV检测的动机因素和偏好的可接受性。材料和方法:本横断面研究样本由46名参与者(女性,年龄30-65岁)组成,包括平均风险(n = 35)和高风险(n = 11)患者,他们已经接受了临床收集的宫颈癌筛查。参与者完成了自我抽样的HPV检测和一项调查。激励因素包括宫颈癌筛查辅助因素、性史、保健因素和自我抽样测试时的感受。我们分析了这些结构与他们下一次宫颈癌筛查的检测方式偏好之间的关系(即,在家自我抽样HPV检测与其他偏好)。结果:很少参与者在自我抽样HPV检测过程中有负面情绪(不舒服:20%;焦虑:22%;不愉快的占15%)。总体而言,与其他检测方法相比,57%的参与者更愿意在家中完成自我抽样的HPV检测以进行下一次宫颈癌筛查。对于一般高危患者,他们下次宫颈癌筛查的检测方式偏好没有差异,并且我们评估的任何激励因素都没有变化(均p < 0.05)。结论:在家中进行自我抽样HPV检测的可接受性很高,不同患者的态度差异不大。这些发现表明,自我抽样HPV检测可能是增加宫颈癌筛查的有效工具,即使是以前有异常筛查结果的高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信