Joint BrEast CAncer & CardiOvascular ScreeniNg: BEACON Study to Assess Opportunistic Cardiovascular Screening Using Breast Arterial Calcification on Mammography.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hayley McKee, Teresa Bianco, Kaitlin Zaki-Metias, Vivianne Freitas, Sandeep Ghai, Kate Hanneman, Jean M Seely, Charlotte Yong-Hing, Husam Abdel-Qadir, Paula J Harvey, Elsie T Nguyen
{"title":"Joint BrEast CAncer & CardiOvascular ScreeniNg: BEACON Study to Assess Opportunistic Cardiovascular Screening Using Breast Arterial Calcification on Mammography.","authors":"Hayley McKee, Teresa Bianco, Kaitlin Zaki-Metias, Vivianne Freitas, Sandeep Ghai, Kate Hanneman, Jean M Seely, Charlotte Yong-Hing, Husam Abdel-Qadir, Paula J Harvey, Elsie T Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/08465371251337022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Breast arterial calcifications (BAC) are not routinely reported on mammography but are linked to coronary artery calcification (CAC) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. We sought to assess primary care provider (PCP) follow-up after BAC and CAC notification and the association between BAC on mammography and CAC on CT. <b>Methods:</b> Participants without known CVD undergoing mammography at a single centre were prospectively recruited over 18 months. BAC were qualitatively scored (none/mild/moderate/severe) by 2 breast radiologists. All participants had research cardiac CT for CAC within 6 months, scored using the Agatston method. Questionnaires collected baseline demographics, risk factors, and follow-up data. <b>Results:</b> 286 participants were included (median age 62 ± 10). Prevalence of BAC was 13% (38/286), 248 had none, 18 mild, 16 moderate, and 4 severe. For CAC: 180 had none, 70 had mild (CAC 1-99), 28 had moderate (CAC 100-399), and 8 had severe (CAC >400). For detecting CAC, BAC presence had 92% specificity (166/180), 23% sensitivity (24/106), and 67% negative predictive value (166/248). Most participants with BAC and CAC (71%, 17/24) were not on lipid-lowering therapy and 63% (15/24) did not believe they had elevated CVD risk. At follow-up (median 202 days), 46% (11/24) with BAC and CAC implemented lifestyle modifications, 92% (22/24) scheduled PCP follow-up, and 56% (10/18) underwent further CV risk assessment following their appointment. One participant with BAC and CAC had a stroke during follow-up. <b>Conclusion:</b> In a prospective cohort without known CVD undergoing mammography, notification of BAC and CAC status prompted high follow-up rates with PCPs and lifestyle modifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":55290,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes","volume":" ","pages":"8465371251337022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371251337022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Breast arterial calcifications (BAC) are not routinely reported on mammography but are linked to coronary artery calcification (CAC) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. We sought to assess primary care provider (PCP) follow-up after BAC and CAC notification and the association between BAC on mammography and CAC on CT. Methods: Participants without known CVD undergoing mammography at a single centre were prospectively recruited over 18 months. BAC were qualitatively scored (none/mild/moderate/severe) by 2 breast radiologists. All participants had research cardiac CT for CAC within 6 months, scored using the Agatston method. Questionnaires collected baseline demographics, risk factors, and follow-up data. Results: 286 participants were included (median age 62 ± 10). Prevalence of BAC was 13% (38/286), 248 had none, 18 mild, 16 moderate, and 4 severe. For CAC: 180 had none, 70 had mild (CAC 1-99), 28 had moderate (CAC 100-399), and 8 had severe (CAC >400). For detecting CAC, BAC presence had 92% specificity (166/180), 23% sensitivity (24/106), and 67% negative predictive value (166/248). Most participants with BAC and CAC (71%, 17/24) were not on lipid-lowering therapy and 63% (15/24) did not believe they had elevated CVD risk. At follow-up (median 202 days), 46% (11/24) with BAC and CAC implemented lifestyle modifications, 92% (22/24) scheduled PCP follow-up, and 56% (10/18) underwent further CV risk assessment following their appointment. One participant with BAC and CAC had a stroke during follow-up. Conclusion: In a prospective cohort without known CVD undergoing mammography, notification of BAC and CAC status prompted high follow-up rates with PCPs and lifestyle modifications.

联合乳腺癌和心血管筛查:BEACON研究评估乳腺动脉钙化在乳房x光检查中的机会性心血管筛查。
目的:乳腺动脉钙化(BAC)在乳房x光检查中没有常规报告,但与冠状动脉钙化(CAC)和心血管疾病(CVD)事件有关。我们试图评估初级保健提供者(PCP)在BAC和CAC通知后的随访情况,以及乳腺x光检查BAC和CT检查CAC之间的关系。方法:没有已知心血管疾病的参与者在单一中心接受乳房x光检查,前瞻性招募超过18个月。由2名乳腺放射科医生对BAC进行定性评分(无/轻度/中度/重度)。所有参与者在6个月内进行心脏CT检查CAC,使用Agatston方法评分。问卷收集了基线人口统计、危险因素和随访数据。结果:纳入286名参与者(中位年龄62±10岁)。BAC患病率为13%(38/286),无BAC 248例,轻度18例,中度16例,重度4例。对于CAC:无CAC 180例,轻度CAC 70例(CAC 1-99),中度CAC 28例(CAC 100-399),重度CAC 8例(CAC 100- 400)。BAC检测CAC的特异性为92%(166/180),敏感性为23%(24/106),阴性预测值为67%(166/248)。大多数患有BAC和CAC的参与者(71%,17/24)没有接受降脂治疗,63%(15/24)认为他们没有升高的心血管疾病风险。在随访(中位202天)中,46%(11/24)的BAC和CAC患者实施了生活方式改变,92%(22/24)的患者计划进行PCP随访,56%(10/18)的患者在预约后接受了进一步的CV风险评估。一名同时患有BAC和CAC的参与者在随访期间发生了中风。结论:在接受乳房x光检查的无已知心血管疾病的前瞻性队列中,BAC和CAC状态的通知提示pcp和生活方式改变的高随访率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.90%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal is a peer-reviewed, Medline-indexed publication that presents a broad scientific review of radiology in Canada. The Journal covers such topics as abdominal imaging, cardiovascular radiology, computed tomography, continuing professional development, education and training, gastrointestinal radiology, health policy and practice, magnetic resonance imaging, musculoskeletal radiology, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, pediatric radiology, radiology history, radiology practice guidelines and advisories, thoracic and cardiac imaging, trauma and emergency room imaging, ultrasonography, and vascular and interventional radiology. Article types considered for publication include original research articles, critically appraised topics, review articles, guest editorials, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letter to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信