Bridging the digital health divide: a narrative review of the causes, implications, and solutions for digital health inequalities.

IF 2.4 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21642850.2025.2493139
Max J Western, Eline S Smit, Thomas Gültzow, Efrat Neter, Falko F Sniehotta, Olivia S Malkowski, Charlene Wright, Heide Busse, Carmen Peuters, Lucia Rehackova, Angelo Gabriel Oteșanu, Ben Ainsworth, Christopher M Jones, Michael Kilb, Angela M Rodrigues, Olga Perski, Alison Wright, Laura König
{"title":"Bridging the digital health divide: a narrative review of the causes, implications, and solutions for digital health inequalities.","authors":"Max J Western, Eline S Smit, Thomas Gültzow, Efrat Neter, Falko F Sniehotta, Olivia S Malkowski, Charlene Wright, Heide Busse, Carmen Peuters, Lucia Rehackova, Angelo Gabriel Oteșanu, Ben Ainsworth, Christopher M Jones, Michael Kilb, Angela M Rodrigues, Olga Perski, Alison Wright, Laura König","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2025.2493139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Digital health interventions have the potential to improve health at a large scale globally by improving access to healthcare services and health-related information, but they tend to benefit more affluent and privileged groups more than those less privileged. <b>Methods:</b> In this narrative review, we describe how this 'digital health divide' can manifest across three different levels reflecting inequalities in access, skills and benefits or outcomes (i.e. the first, second, and tertiary digital divide)<i>.</i> We also discuss four key causes of this digital divide: (i)) digital health literacy as a fundamental determinant; (ii) other personal, social, community, and societal level determinants; (iii) how technology and intervention development contribute to; and (iv) how current research practice exacerbates the digital health divide by developing a biased evidence base. Finally, we formulate implications for research, policy, and practice. <b>Results:</b> Specific recommendations for research include to keep digital health interventions and measurement instruments up to date with fastpaced technological changes, and to involve diverse populations in digital intervention development and evaluation research. For policy and practice, examples of recommendations are to insist on inclusive and accessible design of health technology and to ensure support for digital health intervention enactment prioritises those most vulnerable to the digital divide. <b>Conclusion:</b> We conclude by highlighting the importance of addressing the digital health divide to ensure that as digital technologies' inevitable presence grows, it does not leave those who could benefit most from innovative health technology behind.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"2493139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2025.2493139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital health interventions have the potential to improve health at a large scale globally by improving access to healthcare services and health-related information, but they tend to benefit more affluent and privileged groups more than those less privileged. Methods: In this narrative review, we describe how this 'digital health divide' can manifest across three different levels reflecting inequalities in access, skills and benefits or outcomes (i.e. the first, second, and tertiary digital divide). We also discuss four key causes of this digital divide: (i)) digital health literacy as a fundamental determinant; (ii) other personal, social, community, and societal level determinants; (iii) how technology and intervention development contribute to; and (iv) how current research practice exacerbates the digital health divide by developing a biased evidence base. Finally, we formulate implications for research, policy, and practice. Results: Specific recommendations for research include to keep digital health interventions and measurement instruments up to date with fastpaced technological changes, and to involve diverse populations in digital intervention development and evaluation research. For policy and practice, examples of recommendations are to insist on inclusive and accessible design of health technology and to ensure support for digital health intervention enactment prioritises those most vulnerable to the digital divide. Conclusion: We conclude by highlighting the importance of addressing the digital health divide to ensure that as digital technologies' inevitable presence grows, it does not leave those who could benefit most from innovative health technology behind.

弥合数字卫生鸿沟:对数字卫生不平等的原因、影响和解决办法的叙述性审查。
背景:数字卫生干预措施有可能通过改善获得卫生保健服务和卫生相关信息的机会,在全球范围内大规模改善健康状况,但它们往往更有利于富裕和特权群体,而不是弱势群体。方法:在这篇叙述性综述中,我们描述了这种“数字卫生鸿沟”如何在三个不同的层面上表现出来,反映了在获取、技能和福利或结果方面的不平等(即第一、第二和第三数字鸿沟)。我们还讨论了造成这种数字鸿沟的四个关键原因:(i))数字卫生素养是一个基本决定因素;(ii)其他个人、社会、社区和社会层面的决定因素;(iii)技术和干预措施的发展如何促进;(iv)目前的研究实践如何通过建立有偏见的证据基础而加剧了数字健康鸿沟。最后,我们阐述了对研究、政策和实践的影响。结果:对研究的具体建议包括使数字卫生干预措施和测量工具跟上快速技术变革的步伐,并使不同人群参与数字干预措施的开发和评估研究。在政策和实践方面,建议的例子是坚持包容性和无障碍的卫生技术设计,并确保支持制定数字卫生干预措施时优先考虑最易受数字鸿沟影响的人群。结论:最后,我们强调了解决数字卫生鸿沟的重要性,以确保随着数字技术不可避免的发展,它不会让那些可以从创新卫生技术中获益最多的人落在后面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
57
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信