{"title":"Health-Promoting Behaviour Patterns in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Latent Class Analysis and Association With Prenatal Depression.","authors":"Zhang Jiayuan, Luo Xiaoxi, Chen Dan, Zhou Yuqiu","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) presents significant risks to both maternal and infant health, making adherence to health-promoting behaviours crucial for optimal maternal outcomes. Identifying distinct health behaviour patterns and understanding their association with prenatal depression can offer important insights for targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study classifies health-promoting behaviour patterns among women with GDM and examines their association with prenatal depression to inform tailored interventions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study with latent class analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 570 women with GDM participated in this study. Data were collected through structured questionnaires, including the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to assess health-promoting behaviours and prenatal depression levels. Latent class analysis was used to identify distinct health-promoting behaviour patterns, while logistic regression was conducted to identify factors influencing behaviour classification. A comparative analysis of prenatal depression scores across different behaviour subgroups was also performed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Four distinct health-promoting behaviour patterns were identified: Comprehensive Health Promotion type, health neglect type, psychologically vulnerable type and lifestyle improvement needed type. Factors influencing behaviour patterns included region, education level, working hours, income, primiparity, adherence to prenatal check-ups and partner support. Significant differences in prenatal depression scores were observed across the behaviour patterns (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals the heterogeneity in health-promoting behaviours among women with GDM and underscores the link between these behaviour patterns and prenatal depression. Targeted interventions addressing socio-economic and psychosocial factors can improve adherence to health-promoting behaviours and mitigate prenatal depression risks. Strengthening prenatal care adherence and encouraging partner involvement are effective strategies for improving maternal well-being in women with GDM.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Participants were involved in providing data for this study through self-reports on health-promoting behaviours and prenatal depression. No other contributions from patients or the public were made.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17809","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) presents significant risks to both maternal and infant health, making adherence to health-promoting behaviours crucial for optimal maternal outcomes. Identifying distinct health behaviour patterns and understanding their association with prenatal depression can offer important insights for targeted interventions.
Objective: This study classifies health-promoting behaviour patterns among women with GDM and examines their association with prenatal depression to inform tailored interventions.
Design: A cross-sectional study with latent class analysis.
Method: A total of 570 women with GDM participated in this study. Data were collected through structured questionnaires, including the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to assess health-promoting behaviours and prenatal depression levels. Latent class analysis was used to identify distinct health-promoting behaviour patterns, while logistic regression was conducted to identify factors influencing behaviour classification. A comparative analysis of prenatal depression scores across different behaviour subgroups was also performed.
Result: Four distinct health-promoting behaviour patterns were identified: Comprehensive Health Promotion type, health neglect type, psychologically vulnerable type and lifestyle improvement needed type. Factors influencing behaviour patterns included region, education level, working hours, income, primiparity, adherence to prenatal check-ups and partner support. Significant differences in prenatal depression scores were observed across the behaviour patterns (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: This study reveals the heterogeneity in health-promoting behaviours among women with GDM and underscores the link between these behaviour patterns and prenatal depression. Targeted interventions addressing socio-economic and psychosocial factors can improve adherence to health-promoting behaviours and mitigate prenatal depression risks. Strengthening prenatal care adherence and encouraging partner involvement are effective strategies for improving maternal well-being in women with GDM.
Patient or public contribution: Participants were involved in providing data for this study through self-reports on health-promoting behaviours and prenatal depression. No other contributions from patients or the public were made.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.