Does a Suprascapular Nerve block reduce chronic shoulder pain at 3 months compared to standard non-operative care? A systematic review.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Sean David Scattergood, Abdul Hassan, Mark Williams
{"title":"Does a Suprascapular Nerve block reduce chronic shoulder pain at 3 months compared to standard non-operative care? A systematic review.","authors":"Sean David Scattergood, Abdul Hassan, Mark Williams","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04287-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic shoulder pain affects 2.4-30% of adults at any given time because of a wide variety of underlying pathologies. Treatment of chronic shoulder pain should attempt to address the underlying cause, if possible, either through surgical or non-surgical means. Routine non-operative care involves analgesia, physiotherapy and perhaps injection of corticosteroid at the appropriate site. A suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is a minimally invasive, low-risk procedure which offers analgesia for patients. This review evaluates the effectiveness of SSNB in reducing shoulder pain at a 3-month follow-up, in comparison to standard non-operative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane, ISRCTN and clinicaltrial.gov databases from inception to November 2024. Ninety publications were screened by abstract followed by full text, by the authors against inclusion criteria, and risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five randomised studies were included for analysis, presenting a heterogeneous mix of intervention, study populations and outcome measures. The two studies performing SSNB with local anaesthetic (LA) and corticosteroid found a significant reduction in pain at 3 months. In contrast, compared to studies using LA alone did not demonstrate the same level of efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suprascapular nerve block is an effective analgesic option for chronic shoulder pain, which can be offered to patients as part of a shared decision-making approach. While studies suggest efficacy of combined LA and corticosteroid, limitations such as heterogeneity, variability in result reporting and short follow-up periods reduce the strength of the evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04287-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic shoulder pain affects 2.4-30% of adults at any given time because of a wide variety of underlying pathologies. Treatment of chronic shoulder pain should attempt to address the underlying cause, if possible, either through surgical or non-surgical means. Routine non-operative care involves analgesia, physiotherapy and perhaps injection of corticosteroid at the appropriate site. A suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is a minimally invasive, low-risk procedure which offers analgesia for patients. This review evaluates the effectiveness of SSNB in reducing shoulder pain at a 3-month follow-up, in comparison to standard non-operative care.

Methods: A literature search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane, ISRCTN and clinicaltrial.gov databases from inception to November 2024. Ninety publications were screened by abstract followed by full text, by the authors against inclusion criteria, and risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool.

Results: Five randomised studies were included for analysis, presenting a heterogeneous mix of intervention, study populations and outcome measures. The two studies performing SSNB with local anaesthetic (LA) and corticosteroid found a significant reduction in pain at 3 months. In contrast, compared to studies using LA alone did not demonstrate the same level of efficacy.

Conclusion: Suprascapular nerve block is an effective analgesic option for chronic shoulder pain, which can be offered to patients as part of a shared decision-making approach. While studies suggest efficacy of combined LA and corticosteroid, limitations such as heterogeneity, variability in result reporting and short follow-up periods reduce the strength of the evidence.

与标准的非手术治疗相比,肩胛上神经阻滞能在3个月后减轻慢性肩关节疼痛吗?系统回顾。
目的:慢性肩痛影响2.4-30%的成年人在任何给定的时间,因为各种各样的潜在病理。治疗慢性肩痛应尝试解决根本原因,如果可能的话,通过手术或非手术手段。常规的非手术治疗包括止痛、物理治疗和可能在适当部位注射皮质类固醇。肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)是一种微创、低风险的手术,可为患者提供镇痛。在3个月的随访中,与标准的非手术治疗相比,本综述评估了SSNB在减轻肩部疼痛方面的有效性。方法:检索Medline、Embase、Cochrane、ISRCTN和clinicaltrial.gov等数据库自成立至2024年11月的文献。90篇出版物按摘要和全文进行筛选,作者根据纳入标准进行筛选,并使用RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险。结果:五项随机研究纳入分析,呈现干预、研究人群和结果测量的异质性混合。两项在局部麻醉(LA)和皮质类固醇的情况下进行SSNB的研究发现,3个月时疼痛明显减轻。相比之下,单独使用LA的研究没有显示出相同水平的疗效。结论:肩胛上神经阻滞是治疗慢性肩痛的一种有效的镇痛方法,可作为患者共同决策的一部分。虽然研究表明LA和皮质类固醇联合使用有效,但异质性、结果报告的可变性和随访时间短等局限性降低了证据的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信