A Study on the Volume Changes of the Posterior Cervical Paravertebral Muscles After Unilateral Exposure Channel-Assisted Laminoplasty.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Huajian Zhong, Chen Xu, Haoyi Wang, Ruizhe Wang, Leixin Wei, Huiqiao Wu, Xinwei Wang, Yang Liu, Huajiang Chen, Wen Yuan, Xiaolong Shen
{"title":"A Study on the Volume Changes of the Posterior Cervical Paravertebral Muscles After Unilateral Exposure Channel-Assisted Laminoplasty.","authors":"Huajian Zhong, Chen Xu, Haoyi Wang, Ruizhe Wang, Leixin Wei, Huiqiao Wu, Xinwei Wang, Yang Liu, Huajiang Chen, Wen Yuan, Xiaolong Shen","doi":"10.1177/21925682251340617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of our proposed surgical procedure named unilateral exposure channel-assisted (UCA) laminoplasty in treating degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), and the postoperative volume changes of cervical paraspinal muscles.MethodsFrom January 2020 to January 2022, 104 patients with DCM underwent unilateral open-door laminoplasty, among which, 63 patients underwent UCA laminoplasty (UCA group) and 41 patients underwent traditional laminoplasty (LP group). The radiological and clinical parameters as well as postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed before operation and during the follow-up.ResultsThe operation was completed successfully for all patients from both groups, who showed significant but comparable improvement in clinical outcome indicators including mJOA score, Neck pain VAS score, NDI score and radiological indicators including spinal canal diameter and area at the final follow-up compared to pre-operation. When conducting the intra-group comparison, less intraoperative time consumption and blood loss, less postoperative drainage and lower incidence of axial symptoms were observed in patients from UCA group than LP group. Furthermore, we found better preservation of C2-7 cobb angle, cervical curvature index (CCI) and cervical paraspinal muscle on the hinge side in patients underwent UCA laminoplasty than traditional laminoplasty.ConclusionThe UCA laminoplasty showed similar efficacy on alleviating clinical symptoms, and priority on maintaining cervical sagittal balance, minimizing intraoperative invasion, speeding up postoperative rehabilitation, reducing paraspinal muscle atrophy and postoperative axial symptoms when compared with traditional unilateral open-door laminoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251340617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251340617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of our proposed surgical procedure named unilateral exposure channel-assisted (UCA) laminoplasty in treating degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), and the postoperative volume changes of cervical paraspinal muscles.MethodsFrom January 2020 to January 2022, 104 patients with DCM underwent unilateral open-door laminoplasty, among which, 63 patients underwent UCA laminoplasty (UCA group) and 41 patients underwent traditional laminoplasty (LP group). The radiological and clinical parameters as well as postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed before operation and during the follow-up.ResultsThe operation was completed successfully for all patients from both groups, who showed significant but comparable improvement in clinical outcome indicators including mJOA score, Neck pain VAS score, NDI score and radiological indicators including spinal canal diameter and area at the final follow-up compared to pre-operation. When conducting the intra-group comparison, less intraoperative time consumption and blood loss, less postoperative drainage and lower incidence of axial symptoms were observed in patients from UCA group than LP group. Furthermore, we found better preservation of C2-7 cobb angle, cervical curvature index (CCI) and cervical paraspinal muscle on the hinge side in patients underwent UCA laminoplasty than traditional laminoplasty.ConclusionThe UCA laminoplasty showed similar efficacy on alleviating clinical symptoms, and priority on maintaining cervical sagittal balance, minimizing intraoperative invasion, speeding up postoperative rehabilitation, reducing paraspinal muscle atrophy and postoperative axial symptoms when compared with traditional unilateral open-door laminoplasty.

单侧暴露通道辅助椎板成形术后颈椎后椎旁肌肉体积变化的研究。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的评价单侧暴露通道辅助(UCA)椎板成形术治疗退行性颈椎病(DCM)的疗效,以及术后颈椎旁肌的体积变化。方法2020年1月至2022年1月,104例DCM患者行单侧开门椎板成形术,其中63例行UCA椎板成形术(UCA组),41例行传统椎板成形术(LP组)。记录并分析术前及随访期间的影像学、临床参数及术后并发症。结果两组患者均成功完成手术,mJOA评分、颈部疼痛VAS评分、NDI评分及末次随访时椎管直径和面积等影像学指标均较术前有显著性改善。在组内比较中,UCA组患者术中时间和出血量均少于LP组,术后引流量较少,轴状症状发生率较LP组低。此外,我们发现,与传统椎板成形术相比,行UCA椎板成形术的患者更好地保留了C2-7 cobb角、颈椎曲度指数(CCI)和枢侧颈椎旁肌。结论与传统单侧开门椎板成形术相比,UCA椎板成形术在缓解临床症状方面效果相似,且优先于维持颈椎矢状平衡、减少术中侵害、加快术后康复、减少椎旁肌萎缩及术后轴状症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信