Mateb Al Khalifa, Tianjun Ma, Haya Aljuaid, Siyong Kim, William Y Song
{"title":"Enhanced analysis of gating latency in 0.35T MR-linac through innovative time synchronization of a motion phantom and plastic scintillation detector.","authors":"Mateb Al Khalifa, Tianjun Ma, Haya Aljuaid, Siyong Kim, William Y Song","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate how different gantry angles, breathing rates (BPM), cine image speeds, and tracking algorithms affect beam on/off latency and the subsequent impact on target dose for a 0.35T MR-Linac with a 6 MV FFF beam. The investigation incorporates an image-based MRI4D modus QA motion phantom (MQA) and a measurement-based plastic scintillation detector (PSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MQA's target was customized with an insertion for a 1 mm PSD from BluePhysics. Both the PSD and the MQA were simultaneously synchronized to the Linac to capture latency signals. A plan was created in the ViewRay TPS to deliver dose to the target at three gantry angles (0°, 120°, and 240°). Each gantry angle was evaluated at three breathing rates (10, 12, and 15 BPM). The study also examined two imaging speeds (4 and 8 FPS) and four tracking algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all configurations at 4 FPS, the overall mean beam-on latency was 0.339 ± 0.06 s from the PSD and 0.318 ± 0.06 s from the MQA, whereas at 8 FPS it was 0.630 ± 0.07 s (PSD) and 0.609 ± 0.07 s (MQA). Conversely, the overall mean beam-off latency at 4 FPS was 0.153 ± 0.03 s (PSD) and 0.124 ± 0.03 s (MQA), while at 8 FPS it was 0.121 ± 0.06 s (PSD) and 0.205 ± 0.04 s (MQA). The overall mean difference between gating and non-gating doses was an increase of 12.050 ± 9.2 cGy at 4 FPS and 14.044 ± 7.4 cGy at 8 FPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This comprehensive study underscores the significant influence of gantry angle, breathing rate, cine imaging speed, and tracking algorithms on latency and dose delivery accuracy in a 0.35T MR-Linac.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate how different gantry angles, breathing rates (BPM), cine image speeds, and tracking algorithms affect beam on/off latency and the subsequent impact on target dose for a 0.35T MR-Linac with a 6 MV FFF beam. The investigation incorporates an image-based MRI4D modus QA motion phantom (MQA) and a measurement-based plastic scintillation detector (PSD).
Methods: The MQA's target was customized with an insertion for a 1 mm PSD from BluePhysics. Both the PSD and the MQA were simultaneously synchronized to the Linac to capture latency signals. A plan was created in the ViewRay TPS to deliver dose to the target at three gantry angles (0°, 120°, and 240°). Each gantry angle was evaluated at three breathing rates (10, 12, and 15 BPM). The study also examined two imaging speeds (4 and 8 FPS) and four tracking algorithms.
Results: Across all configurations at 4 FPS, the overall mean beam-on latency was 0.339 ± 0.06 s from the PSD and 0.318 ± 0.06 s from the MQA, whereas at 8 FPS it was 0.630 ± 0.07 s (PSD) and 0.609 ± 0.07 s (MQA). Conversely, the overall mean beam-off latency at 4 FPS was 0.153 ± 0.03 s (PSD) and 0.124 ± 0.03 s (MQA), while at 8 FPS it was 0.121 ± 0.06 s (PSD) and 0.205 ± 0.04 s (MQA). The overall mean difference between gating and non-gating doses was an increase of 12.050 ± 9.2 cGy at 4 FPS and 14.044 ± 7.4 cGy at 8 FPS.
Conclusion: This comprehensive study underscores the significant influence of gantry angle, breathing rate, cine imaging speed, and tracking algorithms on latency and dose delivery accuracy in a 0.35T MR-Linac.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic