Enhanced analysis of gating latency in 0.35T MR-linac through innovative time synchronization of a motion phantom and plastic scintillation detector.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mateb Al Khalifa, Tianjun Ma, Haya Aljuaid, Siyong Kim, William Y Song
{"title":"Enhanced analysis of gating latency in 0.35T MR-linac through innovative time synchronization of a motion phantom and plastic scintillation detector.","authors":"Mateb Al Khalifa, Tianjun Ma, Haya Aljuaid, Siyong Kim, William Y Song","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate how different gantry angles, breathing rates (BPM), cine image speeds, and tracking algorithms affect beam on/off latency and the subsequent impact on target dose for a 0.35T MR-Linac with a 6 MV FFF beam. The investigation incorporates an image-based MRI4D modus QA motion phantom (MQA) and a measurement-based plastic scintillation detector (PSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MQA's target was customized with an insertion for a 1 mm PSD from BluePhysics. Both the PSD and the MQA were simultaneously synchronized to the Linac to capture latency signals. A plan was created in the ViewRay TPS to deliver dose to the target at three gantry angles (0°, 120°, and 240°). Each gantry angle was evaluated at three breathing rates (10, 12, and 15 BPM). The study also examined two imaging speeds (4 and 8 FPS) and four tracking algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all configurations at 4 FPS, the overall mean beam-on latency was 0.339 ± 0.06 s from the PSD and 0.318 ± 0.06 s from the MQA, whereas at 8 FPS it was 0.630 ± 0.07 s (PSD) and 0.609 ± 0.07 s (MQA). Conversely, the overall mean beam-off latency at 4 FPS was 0.153 ± 0.03 s (PSD) and 0.124 ± 0.03 s (MQA), while at 8 FPS it was 0.121 ± 0.06 s (PSD) and 0.205 ± 0.04 s (MQA). The overall mean difference between gating and non-gating doses was an increase of 12.050 ± 9.2 cGy at 4 FPS and 14.044 ± 7.4 cGy at 8 FPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This comprehensive study underscores the significant influence of gantry angle, breathing rate, cine imaging speed, and tracking algorithms on latency and dose delivery accuracy in a 0.35T MR-Linac.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate how different gantry angles, breathing rates (BPM), cine image speeds, and tracking algorithms affect beam on/off latency and the subsequent impact on target dose for a 0.35T MR-Linac with a 6 MV FFF beam. The investigation incorporates an image-based MRI4D modus QA motion phantom (MQA) and a measurement-based plastic scintillation detector (PSD).

Methods: The MQA's target was customized with an insertion for a 1 mm PSD from BluePhysics. Both the PSD and the MQA were simultaneously synchronized to the Linac to capture latency signals. A plan was created in the ViewRay TPS to deliver dose to the target at three gantry angles (0°, 120°, and 240°). Each gantry angle was evaluated at three breathing rates (10, 12, and 15 BPM). The study also examined two imaging speeds (4 and 8 FPS) and four tracking algorithms.

Results: Across all configurations at 4 FPS, the overall mean beam-on latency was 0.339 ± 0.06 s from the PSD and 0.318 ± 0.06 s from the MQA, whereas at 8 FPS it was 0.630 ± 0.07 s (PSD) and 0.609 ± 0.07 s (MQA). Conversely, the overall mean beam-off latency at 4 FPS was 0.153 ± 0.03 s (PSD) and 0.124 ± 0.03 s (MQA), while at 8 FPS it was 0.121 ± 0.06 s (PSD) and 0.205 ± 0.04 s (MQA). The overall mean difference between gating and non-gating doses was an increase of 12.050 ± 9.2 cGy at 4 FPS and 14.044 ± 7.4 cGy at 8 FPS.

Conclusion: This comprehensive study underscores the significant influence of gantry angle, breathing rate, cine imaging speed, and tracking algorithms on latency and dose delivery accuracy in a 0.35T MR-Linac.

通过运动幻影和塑料闪烁检测器的创新时间同步,增强了0.35T MR-linac的门控延迟分析。
目的:本研究旨在评估不同的龙门角度,呼吸频率(BPM),电影图像速度和跟踪算法如何影响光束开/关延迟以及随后对0.35T MR-Linac 6 MV FFF光束的目标剂量的影响。该研究结合了基于图像的MRI4D模态QA运动幻影(MQA)和基于测量的塑料闪烁检测器(PSD)。方法:MQA的靶是定制的插入一个1毫米的PSD从BluePhysics。PSD和MQA同时同步到Linac以捕获延迟信号。在viewway TPS中创建了一个计划,以三个龙门角度(0°,120°和240°)向目标输送剂量。在三种呼吸频率(10、12和15 BPM)下评估每个龙门形角度。该研究还测试了两种成像速度(4和8 FPS)和四种跟踪算法。结果:在4 FPS的所有配置中,PSD和MQA的总体平均波束启动延迟分别为0.339±0.06秒和0.318±0.06秒,而在8 FPS时,PSD和MQA的平均波束启动延迟分别为0.630±0.07秒和0.609±0.07秒。相反,4 FPS时的总体平均波束延迟为0.153±0.03 s (PSD)和0.124±0.03 s (MQA),而8 FPS时的平均波束延迟为0.121±0.06 s (PSD)和0.205±0.04 s (MQA)。门控与非门控剂量的总体平均差异在4 FPS时增加12.050±9.2 cGy,在8 FPS时增加14.044±7.4 cGy。结论:这项综合研究强调了龙门角度、呼吸频率、电影成像速度和跟踪算法对0.35T MR-Linac的潜伏期和剂量传递准确性的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信