A scoping review of machine learning models to predict risk of falls in elders, without using sensor data.

Angelo Capodici, Claudio Fanconi, Catherine Curtin, Alessandro Shapiro, Francesca Noci, Alberto Giannoni, Tina Hernandez-Boussard
{"title":"A scoping review of machine learning models to predict risk of falls in elders, without using sensor data.","authors":"Angelo Capodici, Claudio Fanconi, Catherine Curtin, Alessandro Shapiro, Francesca Noci, Alberto Giannoni, Tina Hernandez-Boussard","doi":"10.1186/s41512-025-00190-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review assesses machine learning (ML) tools that predicted falls, relying on information in health records without using any sensor data. The aim was to assess the available evidence on innovative techniques to improve fall prevention management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were included if they focused on predicting fall risk with machine learning in elderly populations and were written in English. There were 13 different extracted variables, including population characteristics (community dwelling, inpatients, age range, main pathology, ethnicity/race). Furthermore, the number of variables used in the final models, as well as their type, was extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6331 studies were retrieved, and 19 articles met criteria for data extraction. Metric performances reported by authors were commonly high in terms of accuracy (e.g., greater than 0.70). The most represented features included cardiovascular status and mobility assessments. Common gaps identified included a lack of transparent reporting and insufficient fairness assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides evidence that falls can be predicted using ML without using sensors if the amount of data and its quality is adequate. However, further studies are needed to validate these models in diverse groups and populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72800,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","volume":"9 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-025-00190-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This scoping review assesses machine learning (ML) tools that predicted falls, relying on information in health records without using any sensor data. The aim was to assess the available evidence on innovative techniques to improve fall prevention management.

Methods: Studies were included if they focused on predicting fall risk with machine learning in elderly populations and were written in English. There were 13 different extracted variables, including population characteristics (community dwelling, inpatients, age range, main pathology, ethnicity/race). Furthermore, the number of variables used in the final models, as well as their type, was extracted.

Results: A total of 6331 studies were retrieved, and 19 articles met criteria for data extraction. Metric performances reported by authors were commonly high in terms of accuracy (e.g., greater than 0.70). The most represented features included cardiovascular status and mobility assessments. Common gaps identified included a lack of transparent reporting and insufficient fairness assessments.

Conclusions: This review provides evidence that falls can be predicted using ML without using sensors if the amount of data and its quality is adequate. However, further studies are needed to validate these models in diverse groups and populations.

在不使用传感器数据的情况下,对预测老年人跌倒风险的机器学习模型进行范围审查。
目的:本综述评估了机器学习(ML)工具预测跌倒,依赖于健康记录中的信息,而不使用任何传感器数据。目的是评估现有证据的创新技术,以改善跌倒预防管理。方法:如果研究重点是用机器学习预测老年人跌倒风险,并以英语撰写,则纳入研究。共有13个不同的提取变量,包括人口特征(社区居住、住院患者、年龄范围、主要病理、民族/种族)。此外,还提取了最终模型中使用的变量数量及其类型。结果:共检索到6331篇研究,符合数据提取标准的文献有19篇。作者报告的度量性能通常在准确性方面很高(例如,大于0.70)。最具代表性的特征包括心血管状况和活动能力评估。确定的常见差距包括缺乏透明的报告和不充分的公平评估。结论:本综述提供的证据表明,如果数据量和质量足够,可以使用ML预测跌倒而不使用传感器。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证这些模型在不同群体和人群中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信