White Blood Counts of Hospitalized Patients Without Infection, Malignancy, or Immune Dysfunction.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yazan Abu Omar, Erin Sullivan, Rebecca Schulte, Rayli Pichardo, Michael B Rothberg
{"title":"White Blood Counts of Hospitalized Patients Without Infection, Malignancy, or Immune Dysfunction.","authors":"Yazan Abu Omar, Erin Sullivan, Rebecca Schulte, Rayli Pichardo, Michael B Rothberg","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>An elevated white blood cell (WBC) count may indicate malignancy, infection, and immune dysfunction. In diagnosing these conditions, physicians generally evaluate laboratory results compared with reference ranges based on healthy populations. Reference ranges for hospitalized patients are lacking. This study aims to define a normal reference range for WBC count in hospitalized patients without malignancy, infection, or immune dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of nonsurgical patients hospitalized from 2017 to 2018 in the Cleveland Clinic Health System without malignancy, infection, or immunological dysfunction. WBC count, absolute neutrophil count, and absolute lymphocyte count were collected. We calculated means, standard deviations, and the reference range for each variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46,419 patients had WBC counts. Mean WBC count was 8.0 (standard deviation 3.31, reference range 1.6-14.5). In a multivariable linear regression, mean WBC count decreased with age, Black race relative to White race, and congestive heart failure. Body mass index, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and steroid use were associated with higher WBC count. In total, 13.5% of patients in this cohort had WBC counts above the \"normal\" threshold of 11.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among hospitalized patients without infection, malignancy, or immune dysfunction, the normal range for WBC count was 1.6 to 14.5 × 10<sup>9</sup> WBCs/L. Age, race, body mass index, steroid use, and several comorbidities were associated with WBC count variation from the reference levels established based on healthy populations. Physicians should be cautious when interpreting WBC counts between 11 and 14.5 × 10<sup>9</sup> WBCs/L, which appear to represent normal values in the hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 5","pages":"287-292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001820","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: An elevated white blood cell (WBC) count may indicate malignancy, infection, and immune dysfunction. In diagnosing these conditions, physicians generally evaluate laboratory results compared with reference ranges based on healthy populations. Reference ranges for hospitalized patients are lacking. This study aims to define a normal reference range for WBC count in hospitalized patients without malignancy, infection, or immune dysfunction.

Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of nonsurgical patients hospitalized from 2017 to 2018 in the Cleveland Clinic Health System without malignancy, infection, or immunological dysfunction. WBC count, absolute neutrophil count, and absolute lymphocyte count were collected. We calculated means, standard deviations, and the reference range for each variable.

Results: A total of 46,419 patients had WBC counts. Mean WBC count was 8.0 (standard deviation 3.31, reference range 1.6-14.5). In a multivariable linear regression, mean WBC count decreased with age, Black race relative to White race, and congestive heart failure. Body mass index, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and steroid use were associated with higher WBC count. In total, 13.5% of patients in this cohort had WBC counts above the "normal" threshold of 11.

Conclusions: Among hospitalized patients without infection, malignancy, or immune dysfunction, the normal range for WBC count was 1.6 to 14.5 × 109 WBCs/L. Age, race, body mass index, steroid use, and several comorbidities were associated with WBC count variation from the reference levels established based on healthy populations. Physicians should be cautious when interpreting WBC counts between 11 and 14.5 × 109 WBCs/L, which appear to represent normal values in the hospital.

无感染、恶性肿瘤或免疫功能障碍住院患者的白细胞计数。
目的:白细胞(WBC)计数升高可能提示恶性肿瘤、感染和免疫功能障碍。在诊断这些疾病时,医生通常将实验室结果与基于健康人群的参考范围进行比较。缺乏住院患者的参考范围。本研究旨在确定无恶性肿瘤、感染或免疫功能障碍住院患者白细胞计数的正常参考范围。方法:这是一项回顾性横断面研究,研究对象是2017年至2018年在克利夫兰诊所卫生系统住院的无恶性肿瘤、感染或免疫功能障碍的非手术患者。采集白细胞计数、绝对中性粒细胞计数和绝对淋巴细胞计数。我们计算了每个变量的均值、标准差和参考范围。结果:共有46419例患者有白细胞计数。平均白细胞计数8.0(标准差3.31,参考范围1.6-14.5)。在多变量线性回归中,平均白细胞计数随年龄、黑人相对于白人和充血性心力衰竭而下降。体重指数、糖尿病、慢性肾病、慢性阻塞性肺病和类固醇使用与白细胞计数升高有关。在该队列中,13.5%的患者白细胞计数高于“正常”阈值11。结论:在无感染、恶性肿瘤、免疫功能障碍的住院患者中,白细胞计数正常范围为1.6 ~ 14.5 × 109 /L。年龄、种族、体重指数、类固醇使用和一些合并症与基于健康人群建立的参考水平的白细胞计数变化有关。在解释白细胞计数在11到14.5 × 109 /L之间时,医生应该谨慎,这似乎代表了医院的正常值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信