Testing for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the anterior nares for antibiotic de-escalation in patients presenting with acute skin and soft tissue infections: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sara Bohjanen, Connor Goldstick, Maria Hordinsky
{"title":"Testing for methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in the anterior nares for antibiotic de-escalation in patients presenting with acute skin and soft tissue infections: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sara Bohjanen, Connor Goldstick, Maria Hordinsky","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To improve the understanding of appropriate antibiotic de-escalation and stewardship by consolidating the evidence on screening for methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) colonization of the nares to predict MRSA in acute skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched by two reviewers for articles on MRSA detection in the nares and acute SSTIs. The quality and risk of bias of the articles were then assessed. The primary outcomes of interest were pooled sensitivity and specificity. Sub-analyses were also performed to test for heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening 1040 records, 15 articles (n = 1,970) were included in the meta-analysis. Using MRSA nares screening to predict MRSA in acute SSTIs had an overall specificity of 0.949 and sensitivity of 0.474. With a prevalence of 29.1%, the calculated NPV was 0.815. There were sub-analyses on various study variables, such as study location, participant age, and detection by polymerase chain reaction versus culture. The only significant finding was an increased sensitivity for adults (0.543) compared to pediatric participants (0.285).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis that focuses on the performance of MRSA nares screening for predicting MRSA infection in patients presenting with acute SSTIs. The baseline prevalence of MRSA SSTIs is important for interpreting the screening results, and the prevalence is influenced by geography and patient factors. This clinical context must be considered before utilizing MRSA nares screening for acute SSTIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.58","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To improve the understanding of appropriate antibiotic de-escalation and stewardship by consolidating the evidence on screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization of the nares to predict MRSA in acute skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs).

Methods: This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Six databases were searched by two reviewers for articles on MRSA detection in the nares and acute SSTIs. The quality and risk of bias of the articles were then assessed. The primary outcomes of interest were pooled sensitivity and specificity. Sub-analyses were also performed to test for heterogeneity.

Results: After screening 1040 records, 15 articles (n = 1,970) were included in the meta-analysis. Using MRSA nares screening to predict MRSA in acute SSTIs had an overall specificity of 0.949 and sensitivity of 0.474. With a prevalence of 29.1%, the calculated NPV was 0.815. There were sub-analyses on various study variables, such as study location, participant age, and detection by polymerase chain reaction versus culture. The only significant finding was an increased sensitivity for adults (0.543) compared to pediatric participants (0.285).

Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis that focuses on the performance of MRSA nares screening for predicting MRSA infection in patients presenting with acute SSTIs. The baseline prevalence of MRSA SSTIs is important for interpreting the screening results, and the prevalence is influenced by geography and patient factors. This clinical context must be considered before utilizing MRSA nares screening for acute SSTIs.

急性皮肤和软组织感染患者前鼻耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌抗生素降药检测:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:通过巩固耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)鼻腔定植的筛查证据,以预测急性皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)的MRSA,提高对适当抗生素降药和管理的认识。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行meta分析。两位审稿人检索了6个数据库,检索了关于MRSA在鼻腔和急性ssti检测的文章。然后对文章的质量和偏倚风险进行评估。主要研究结果为敏感性和特异性。还进行了亚分析以检验异质性。结果:筛选1040份记录后,15篇文章(n = 1970)被纳入meta分析。MRSA鼻腔筛查预测急性SSTIs中MRSA的总特异性为0.949,敏感性为0.474。患病率为29.1%,计算NPV为0.815。对各种研究变量进行了亚分析,如研究地点、参与者年龄、聚合酶链反应检测与培养。唯一有意义的发现是成人的敏感性(0.543)比儿科参与者(0.285)高。讨论:据我们所知,这是第一个荟萃分析,关注MRSA鼻腔筛查在预测急性SSTIs患者MRSA感染方面的表现。MRSA SSTIs的基线患病率对解释筛查结果很重要,患病率受地理和患者因素的影响。在使用MRSA鼻腔筛查急性SSTIs之前,必须考虑这一临床背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信