Promoting real-world evidence use for antimicrobial stewardship in Latin America: evaluation of impact of a two-part educational webinar series.

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2025-04-18 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf056
Monica Augustyniak, Juan Carlos García-Betancur, Sophie Péloquin, Germán Esparza, Christian José Pallares, Diego Rosselli, David De Luna, Patrice Lazure, Maria Virginia Villegas
{"title":"Promoting real-world evidence use for antimicrobial stewardship in Latin America: evaluation of impact of a two-part educational webinar series.","authors":"Monica Augustyniak, Juan Carlos García-Betancur, Sophie Péloquin, Germán Esparza, Christian José Pallares, Diego Rosselli, David De Luna, Patrice Lazure, Maria Virginia Villegas","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Educational programs on the use of real-world evidence (RWE) in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) are scarce in Latin America (LATAM).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and evaluate an online educational program supporting LATAM healthcare professionals (HCP)'s ability to use and generate RWE for effective antimicrobial agent use, aligned with AMS principles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two 90-min webinars were developed by subject matter experts. Changes in knowledge, skills, confidence and attitudes were measured via paired PRE-and POST-intervention survey questions. Satisfaction, intent to change and remaining barriers were surveyed POST-intervention. McNemar and Wilcoxon Signed Rank statistical tests assessed differences in paired dichotomous and ordinal data, respectively. Unpaired data underwent descriptive analysis. Open-ended responses were subject to thematic content analysis (inductive reasoning approach).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis sample included 741 PRE-intervention survey completers (epidemiologists, infection control specialists, chemists, pharmacists, biologists, microbiologists, bacteriologists and other physicians), with 47 completing the full POST survey (33 following webinar 1, and 14 following webinar 2). A significant increase in the percent of completers who were confident of 'what constitutes RWE' was found PRE (31%) to POST (73%) intervention (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Median self-reported skill levels changed from '2-basic' to '3-intermediate' for providing examples of RWE and applying RWE in the context of AMS (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Barriers included low perceived value of RWE by administrators and limited access to appropriate data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This education improved HCPs' confidence in knowing what constitutes RWE. Findings provide direction for future interventions aimed at enhancing access to and appropriate use of RWE to inform AMS in LATAM.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 2","pages":"dlaf056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Educational programs on the use of real-world evidence (RWE) in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) are scarce in Latin America (LATAM).

Objectives: To develop and evaluate an online educational program supporting LATAM healthcare professionals (HCP)'s ability to use and generate RWE for effective antimicrobial agent use, aligned with AMS principles.

Methods: Two 90-min webinars were developed by subject matter experts. Changes in knowledge, skills, confidence and attitudes were measured via paired PRE-and POST-intervention survey questions. Satisfaction, intent to change and remaining barriers were surveyed POST-intervention. McNemar and Wilcoxon Signed Rank statistical tests assessed differences in paired dichotomous and ordinal data, respectively. Unpaired data underwent descriptive analysis. Open-ended responses were subject to thematic content analysis (inductive reasoning approach).

Results: The analysis sample included 741 PRE-intervention survey completers (epidemiologists, infection control specialists, chemists, pharmacists, biologists, microbiologists, bacteriologists and other physicians), with 47 completing the full POST survey (33 following webinar 1, and 14 following webinar 2). A significant increase in the percent of completers who were confident of 'what constitutes RWE' was found PRE (31%) to POST (73%) intervention (P < 0.001). Median self-reported skill levels changed from '2-basic' to '3-intermediate' for providing examples of RWE and applying RWE in the context of AMS (P < 0.05). Barriers included low perceived value of RWE by administrators and limited access to appropriate data.

Conclusions: This education improved HCPs' confidence in knowing what constitutes RWE. Findings provide direction for future interventions aimed at enhancing access to and appropriate use of RWE to inform AMS in LATAM.

促进拉丁美洲抗菌药物管理的真实证据使用:评估两部分教育网络研讨会系列的影响。
背景:关于在抗菌药物管理(AMS)中使用真实证据(RWE)的教育计划在拉丁美洲(LATAM)很少。目标:开发和评估一个在线教育项目,支持LATAM医疗保健专业人员(HCP)使用和生成有效抗菌药物使用RWE的能力,与AMS原则保持一致。方法:由主题专家制作两个90分钟的网络研讨会。知识、技能、信心和态度的变化通过干预前和干预后的成对调查问题来衡量。干预后对满意度、改变意图和剩余障碍进行调查。McNemar和Wilcoxon sign Rank统计检验分别评估配对二分类和有序数据的差异。对未配对数据进行描述性分析。开放式回答采用主题内容分析(归纳推理方法)。结果:分析样本包括741名干预前调查完成者(流行病学家、感染控制专家、化学家、药剂师、生物学家、微生物学家、细菌学家和其他医生),其中47名完成了完整的POST调查(33名参加了网络研讨会1,14名参加了网络研讨会2)。在干预前(31%)到干预后(73%),对“什么构成RWE”有信心的完成者的百分比显著增加(P P)。结论:这种教育提高了医护人员对知道什么构成RWE的信心。研究结果为未来的干预措施提供了方向,旨在加强对RWE的获取和适当使用,为拉丁美洲的医疗辅助服务提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信