Manuscript Title: Defining and Characterizing Inappropriate Goals of Care Designation-A 10 year retrospective multicenter ICU cohort study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Selena Au, Paloma Perepeluk, Andrea Soo, Jessica Simon
{"title":"Manuscript Title: Defining and Characterizing Inappropriate Goals of Care Designation-A 10 year retrospective multicenter ICU cohort study.","authors":"Selena Au, Paloma Perepeluk, Andrea Soo, Jessica Simon","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Goals of Care Designation (GCD) is a medical order used to describe and communicate the general aim of care. It includes a \"code status\" that guides the healthcare team on which interventions to offer during acute clinical deterioration. Inappropriate GCD occurs when there is lack of communication on the patient's wishes and values in the context of their health status, documentation of the conversation and plan, or agreement on medical effectiveness between patient, family and health care team stakeholders. The frequency of inappropriate GCD, the contributing factors, and their outcomes in ICUs are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an existing quality assurance database, we conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adult patients who died in the ICU between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 to determine the frequency, etiology, and associated stakeholder and contextual features of patients flagged with goals of care concern by physician reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4656 patients who died in the ICU and underwent a standardized morbidity and mortality review, 265 cases (5.7%) met criteria for inappropriate GCD for further analysis. Cases had one or more elements of suboptimal communication (n=119, 44.9%), documentation practices (n=77, 29.1%), or agreement of stakeholders (n = 115, 43.4%). Escalation in GCD to more intensive resuscitation orders occurred in 57 cases (21.5%) with common contextual features of crisis communication in the ER, or in preparation for a surgery or procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We validated one definition of inappropriate GCD through a large retrospective cohort that can be used as a baseline incidence for future QI endeavors. Through this cohort analysis, a breadth of system opportunities to reduce inappropriate care through optimization of communication, documentation, and stakeholder decision-making processes is described.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Goals of Care Designation (GCD) is a medical order used to describe and communicate the general aim of care. It includes a "code status" that guides the healthcare team on which interventions to offer during acute clinical deterioration. Inappropriate GCD occurs when there is lack of communication on the patient's wishes and values in the context of their health status, documentation of the conversation and plan, or agreement on medical effectiveness between patient, family and health care team stakeholders. The frequency of inappropriate GCD, the contributing factors, and their outcomes in ICUs are unknown.

Methods: Using an existing quality assurance database, we conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adult patients who died in the ICU between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 to determine the frequency, etiology, and associated stakeholder and contextual features of patients flagged with goals of care concern by physician reviewers.

Results: Of 4656 patients who died in the ICU and underwent a standardized morbidity and mortality review, 265 cases (5.7%) met criteria for inappropriate GCD for further analysis. Cases had one or more elements of suboptimal communication (n=119, 44.9%), documentation practices (n=77, 29.1%), or agreement of stakeholders (n = 115, 43.4%). Escalation in GCD to more intensive resuscitation orders occurred in 57 cases (21.5%) with common contextual features of crisis communication in the ER, or in preparation for a surgery or procedure.

Conclusion: We validated one definition of inappropriate GCD through a large retrospective cohort that can be used as a baseline incidence for future QI endeavors. Through this cohort analysis, a breadth of system opportunities to reduce inappropriate care through optimization of communication, documentation, and stakeholder decision-making processes is described.

论文标题:护理指定不恰当目标的定义和特征——10年多中心ICU回顾性队列研究。
背景:护理目标指定(GCD)是一种用于描述和传达护理总体目标的医疗命令。它包括一个“代码状态”,指导医疗团队在急性临床恶化期间提供哪些干预措施。不适当的GCD发生在缺乏就患者的健康状况、谈话和计划的文件或患者、家庭和医疗保健团队利益相关者之间的医疗有效性达成一致的情况下。不适当GCD的频率、影响因素及其在icu中的结果尚不清楚。方法:利用现有的质量保证数据库,我们对2010年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间在ICU死亡的成年患者进行了一项回顾性多中心队列研究,以确定医生审稿人标记为护理关注目标的患者的频率、病因、相关利益相关者和背景特征。结果:在ICU死亡的4656例患者中,进行了标准化的发病率和死亡率回顾,265例(5.7%)符合不适当GCD的标准,可供进一步分析。案例有一个或多个次优沟通元素(n=119, 44.9%),文档化实践(n=77, 29.1%),或利益相关者的协议(n = 115,43.4%)。有57例(21.5%)的GCD升级为更强化的复苏命令,这些病例在急诊室或准备手术或程序时具有危机沟通的共同背景特征。结论:我们通过大型回顾性队列验证了不适当GCD的一个定义,该定义可作为未来QI努力的基线发生率。通过本队列分析,描述了通过优化沟通、文档和利益相关者决策过程来减少不当护理的广泛系统机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信