Selena Au, Paloma Perepeluk, Andrea Soo, Jessica Simon
{"title":"Manuscript Title: Defining and Characterizing Inappropriate Goals of Care Designation-A 10 year retrospective multicenter ICU cohort study.","authors":"Selena Au, Paloma Perepeluk, Andrea Soo, Jessica Simon","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Goals of Care Designation (GCD) is a medical order used to describe and communicate the general aim of care. It includes a \"code status\" that guides the healthcare team on which interventions to offer during acute clinical deterioration. Inappropriate GCD occurs when there is lack of communication on the patient's wishes and values in the context of their health status, documentation of the conversation and plan, or agreement on medical effectiveness between patient, family and health care team stakeholders. The frequency of inappropriate GCD, the contributing factors, and their outcomes in ICUs are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an existing quality assurance database, we conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adult patients who died in the ICU between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 to determine the frequency, etiology, and associated stakeholder and contextual features of patients flagged with goals of care concern by physician reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4656 patients who died in the ICU and underwent a standardized morbidity and mortality review, 265 cases (5.7%) met criteria for inappropriate GCD for further analysis. Cases had one or more elements of suboptimal communication (n=119, 44.9%), documentation practices (n=77, 29.1%), or agreement of stakeholders (n = 115, 43.4%). Escalation in GCD to more intensive resuscitation orders occurred in 57 cases (21.5%) with common contextual features of crisis communication in the ER, or in preparation for a surgery or procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We validated one definition of inappropriate GCD through a large retrospective cohort that can be used as a baseline incidence for future QI endeavors. Through this cohort analysis, a breadth of system opportunities to reduce inappropriate care through optimization of communication, documentation, and stakeholder decision-making processes is described.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Goals of Care Designation (GCD) is a medical order used to describe and communicate the general aim of care. It includes a "code status" that guides the healthcare team on which interventions to offer during acute clinical deterioration. Inappropriate GCD occurs when there is lack of communication on the patient's wishes and values in the context of their health status, documentation of the conversation and plan, or agreement on medical effectiveness between patient, family and health care team stakeholders. The frequency of inappropriate GCD, the contributing factors, and their outcomes in ICUs are unknown.
Methods: Using an existing quality assurance database, we conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adult patients who died in the ICU between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 to determine the frequency, etiology, and associated stakeholder and contextual features of patients flagged with goals of care concern by physician reviewers.
Results: Of 4656 patients who died in the ICU and underwent a standardized morbidity and mortality review, 265 cases (5.7%) met criteria for inappropriate GCD for further analysis. Cases had one or more elements of suboptimal communication (n=119, 44.9%), documentation practices (n=77, 29.1%), or agreement of stakeholders (n = 115, 43.4%). Escalation in GCD to more intensive resuscitation orders occurred in 57 cases (21.5%) with common contextual features of crisis communication in the ER, or in preparation for a surgery or procedure.
Conclusion: We validated one definition of inappropriate GCD through a large retrospective cohort that can be used as a baseline incidence for future QI endeavors. Through this cohort analysis, a breadth of system opportunities to reduce inappropriate care through optimization of communication, documentation, and stakeholder decision-making processes is described.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.