Fatal outcomes following onasemnogene abeparvovec in advanced-stage spinal muscular atrophy.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Peerada Pongsakornkullachart, Pimchanok Kulsirichawaroj, Ratcharin Kongkasuwan, Prakarn Tovichien, Settapong Jitwongwai, Supaluck Kanjanauthai, Nutnicha Preeprem, Sivaporn Limpaninlachat, Nisasri Sermpon, Oranee Sanmaneechai
{"title":"Fatal outcomes following onasemnogene abeparvovec in advanced-stage spinal muscular atrophy.","authors":"Peerada Pongsakornkullachart, Pimchanok Kulsirichawaroj, Ratcharin Kongkasuwan, Prakarn Tovichien, Settapong Jitwongwai, Supaluck Kanjanauthai, Nutnicha Preeprem, Sivaporn Limpaninlachat, Nisasri Sermpon, Oranee Sanmaneechai","doi":"10.1038/s41434-025-00535-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Supported by encouraging trial outcomes, onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) was authorized for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Nevertheless, efficacy of OA in advanced SMA patients remains underexplored. This investigation assessed clinical effectiveness and adverse effects of OA in a cohort including advanced SMA, and compared to historical survival data for SMA type 1 patients in Thailand. We conducted observational cohort study at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, from May 2019 to April 2022. The study enrolled eight SMA patients receiving OA therapy. The cohort comprised five SMA type 1 patients treated at 16.7 months (6.5-24.9 months) and three SMA type 2 patients treated at 20.3 months (19-31.5 months). Before receiving OA, all Type 1 patients required 24-hour invasive ventilation and feeding support. Post-treatment, Three of five showed gradual improvement in motor scores, but none achieved new motor milestones. Survival rate was not improved, with all experiencing fatalities. Conversely, Type 2 patients exhibited motor score improvement without serious adverse events. OA did not significantly improve clinical outcomes or survival rates in advanced Type 1 SMA. These findings highlight need for additional caution when administering OA to severe SMA Type 1 and more specific guidelines in selecting subgroups for treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12699,"journal":{"name":"Gene Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gene Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-025-00535-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supported by encouraging trial outcomes, onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) was authorized for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Nevertheless, efficacy of OA in advanced SMA patients remains underexplored. This investigation assessed clinical effectiveness and adverse effects of OA in a cohort including advanced SMA, and compared to historical survival data for SMA type 1 patients in Thailand. We conducted observational cohort study at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, from May 2019 to April 2022. The study enrolled eight SMA patients receiving OA therapy. The cohort comprised five SMA type 1 patients treated at 16.7 months (6.5-24.9 months) and three SMA type 2 patients treated at 20.3 months (19-31.5 months). Before receiving OA, all Type 1 patients required 24-hour invasive ventilation and feeding support. Post-treatment, Three of five showed gradual improvement in motor scores, but none achieved new motor milestones. Survival rate was not improved, with all experiencing fatalities. Conversely, Type 2 patients exhibited motor score improvement without serious adverse events. OA did not significantly improve clinical outcomes or survival rates in advanced Type 1 SMA. These findings highlight need for additional caution when administering OA to severe SMA Type 1 and more specific guidelines in selecting subgroups for treatment.

晚期脊髓性肌萎缩患者onasemnogene abparvovec后的致命结果。
在令人鼓舞的试验结果的支持下,onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA)被批准用于治疗脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)。然而,OA在晚期SMA患者中的疗效仍有待进一步研究。该研究评估了OA在包括晚期SMA在内的队列中的临床疗效和不良反应,并与泰国1型SMA患者的历史生存数据进行了比较。我们于2019年5月至2022年4月在泰国Siriraj医院进行了观察性队列研究。该研究招募了8名接受OA治疗的SMA患者。该队列包括5名1型SMA患者,治疗时间为16.7个月(6.5-24.9个月),3名2型SMA患者治疗时间为20.3个月(19-31.5个月)。在接受OA之前,所有1型患者需要24小时有创通气和喂养支持。治疗后,5人中有3人的运动得分逐渐改善,但没有人达到新的运动里程碑。生存率没有提高,所有人都有死亡。相反,2型患者表现出运动评分改善,无严重不良事件。OA没有显著改善晚期1型SMA的临床结果或生存率。这些发现强调了在对严重的1型SMA进行OA治疗时需要额外的谨慎,以及在选择治疗亚组时需要更具体的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gene Therapy
Gene Therapy 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Gene Therapy covers both the research and clinical applications of novel therapeutic techniques based on a genetic component. Over the last few decades, significant advances in technologies ranging from identifying novel genetic targets that cause disease through to clinical studies, which show therapeutic benefit, have elevated this multidisciplinary field to the forefront of modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信