The comparison of the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of de Quervain tenosynovitis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Zeynep Karakuzu Güngör, Erdal Güngör
{"title":"The comparison of the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of de Quervain tenosynovitis.","authors":"Zeynep Karakuzu Güngör, Erdal Güngör","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.14671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate and compare the treatment efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) regarding pain management and functionality in patients with de Quervain tenosynovitis (DQT).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between May 2022 and November 2022, a total of 60 patients with DQT (16 males, 34 females; mean age: 43.3±7.7 years; range, 18 to 65 years) were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as follows: Group A (ESWT, n=29) and Group B (HILT, n=31). The patients were asked to refrain from all types of exercise 24 h before the experiment. The pain level of the patients at the time of presentation was evaluated via Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the function outcome was evaluated with Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH) before and after the treatment. Muscle strength was evaluated with a Jamar hand dynamometer, and an algometer was used to measure pressure pain threshold (PPT). The Global Assessment Scale (GAS) was used to measure the treatment success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intragroup comparisons revealed significant improvements in all parameters after the treatment in both groups (p<0.05). The VAS-rest score, the VAS-movement score, the QDASH score, pain-free grip strength (PFGS), and PPT showed a significant difference before treatment at three weeks and three months (p<0.01). The difference between the PPT values of the groups at three weeks was significant (p<0.01). The third-week PPT value of Group B was higher than the PPT value of Group A. The difference between GAS 1 and GAS 2 of both groups was statistically significant at three weeks and three months (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both ESWT and HILT treatments are safe and effective in DQT treatment. The ESWT is a recent, non-invasive therapeutic modality which is effective, convenient, and safe in DQT. On the other hand, HILT is a non-invasive, reliable method which has a greater effect on DQT.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"71 1","pages":"28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.14671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate and compare the treatment efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) regarding pain management and functionality in patients with de Quervain tenosynovitis (DQT).

Patients and methods: Between May 2022 and November 2022, a total of 60 patients with DQT (16 males, 34 females; mean age: 43.3±7.7 years; range, 18 to 65 years) were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as follows: Group A (ESWT, n=29) and Group B (HILT, n=31). The patients were asked to refrain from all types of exercise 24 h before the experiment. The pain level of the patients at the time of presentation was evaluated via Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the function outcome was evaluated with Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH) before and after the treatment. Muscle strength was evaluated with a Jamar hand dynamometer, and an algometer was used to measure pressure pain threshold (PPT). The Global Assessment Scale (GAS) was used to measure the treatment success.

Results: The intragroup comparisons revealed significant improvements in all parameters after the treatment in both groups (p<0.05). The VAS-rest score, the VAS-movement score, the QDASH score, pain-free grip strength (PFGS), and PPT showed a significant difference before treatment at three weeks and three months (p<0.01). The difference between the PPT values of the groups at three weeks was significant (p<0.01). The third-week PPT value of Group B was higher than the PPT value of Group A. The difference between GAS 1 and GAS 2 of both groups was statistically significant at three weeks and three months (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Both ESWT and HILT treatments are safe and effective in DQT treatment. The ESWT is a recent, non-invasive therapeutic modality which is effective, convenient, and safe in DQT. On the other hand, HILT is a non-invasive, reliable method which has a greater effect on DQT.

Abstract Image

体外冲击波治疗与高强度激光治疗德奎文性腱鞘炎疗效比较。
目的:本研究旨在探讨和比较体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)和高强度激光治疗(HILT)对德Quervain型腱鞘炎(DQT)患者疼痛管理和功能的治疗效果。患者与方法:2022年5月至2022年11月,共60例DQT患者(男性16例,女性34例;平均年龄:43.3±7.7岁;年龄范围为18岁至65岁)。将患者随机分为两组:A组(ESWT, n=29)和B组(HILT, n=31)。要求患者在实验前24小时不要进行任何形式的运动。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价患者就诊时的疼痛程度,采用治疗前后手臂、肩、手快速失能评分法(QDASH)评价患者的功能结局。肌肉力量用Jamar手测力仪评估,压痛阈值(PPT)用测力仪测量。采用全球评估量表(GAS)衡量治疗成功程度。结果:组内比较显示,两组治疗后各项参数均有显著改善(p)。结论:ESWT和HILT治疗在DQT治疗中均安全有效。ESWT是最近一种有效、方便、安全的无创治疗方法。另一方面,HILT是一种无创、可靠的方法,对DQT有更大的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信