Post-TACE ALBI-Score Trajectory in Intermediate and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prognostic Implications and Influencing Factors Analysis.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-05-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S503581
Jian Li, Tianyuyi Feng, Chi Cui, Haochen Wang, Tianhao Su, Long Jin, Xiaohu Zhao, Weizhong Xiao
{"title":"Post-TACE ALBI-Score Trajectory in Intermediate and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prognostic Implications and Influencing Factors Analysis.","authors":"Jian Li, Tianyuyi Feng, Chi Cui, Haochen Wang, Tianhao Su, Long Jin, Xiaohu Zhao, Weizhong Xiao","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S503581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The long-term effects of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) on liver function and their prognostic implications in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been fully explored. The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score, an objective measure of liver function, is a validated prognostic tool in HCC. This study aims to characterize the longitudinal trajectories of ALBI-scores after TACE, evaluate their impact on clinical outcomes, and identify factors influencing these trajectories.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with BCLC stage B/C HCC who underwent TACE, with baseline and at least two post-TACE ALBI-score measurements. Group-Based Trajectory Modeling (GBTM) was used to identify distinct ALBI-score trajectories. Clinical outcomes and patient characteristics were compared across trajectory groups. A CatBoost-based clinical prediction model was developed to identify factors influencing ALBI-score trajectories, with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values providing feature importance interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 501 patients, three ALBI-score trajectories were identified: improve, stable, and decline. The improve group had better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the stable and decline groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed that ALBI-score trajectories were independent risk factors for OS. Subgroup analysis suggested that TACE plus systemic therapy reduced mortality risk in the stable and decline groups. The CatBoost model effectively distinguished distinct trajectory groups, with SHAP analysis highlighting ALBI-grade, Child-Pugh class, and tumor number as key predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-TACE ALBI-score trajectories are closely linked to clinical outcomes, with improved liver function associated with better prognosis. Monitoring these trajectories could guide personalized treatment strategies for HCC patients undergoing TACE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"865-878"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S503581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The long-term effects of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) on liver function and their prognostic implications in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been fully explored. The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score, an objective measure of liver function, is a validated prognostic tool in HCC. This study aims to characterize the longitudinal trajectories of ALBI-scores after TACE, evaluate their impact on clinical outcomes, and identify factors influencing these trajectories.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients with BCLC stage B/C HCC who underwent TACE, with baseline and at least two post-TACE ALBI-score measurements. Group-Based Trajectory Modeling (GBTM) was used to identify distinct ALBI-score trajectories. Clinical outcomes and patient characteristics were compared across trajectory groups. A CatBoost-based clinical prediction model was developed to identify factors influencing ALBI-score trajectories, with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values providing feature importance interpretation.

Results: Among 501 patients, three ALBI-score trajectories were identified: improve, stable, and decline. The improve group had better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the stable and decline groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed that ALBI-score trajectories were independent risk factors for OS. Subgroup analysis suggested that TACE plus systemic therapy reduced mortality risk in the stable and decline groups. The CatBoost model effectively distinguished distinct trajectory groups, with SHAP analysis highlighting ALBI-grade, Child-Pugh class, and tumor number as key predictors.

Conclusion: Post-TACE ALBI-score trajectories are closely linked to clinical outcomes, with improved liver function associated with better prognosis. Monitoring these trajectories could guide personalized treatment strategies for HCC patients undergoing TACE.

中晚期肝细胞癌tace后albi评分轨迹:预后意义及影响因素分析。
目的:经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)对肝细胞癌(HCC)患者肝功能的长期影响及其预后意义尚未得到充分探讨。白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分是一种衡量肝功能的客观指标,是HCC的有效预后工具。本研究旨在描述TACE后albi评分的纵向轨迹,评估其对临床结果的影响,并确定影响这些轨迹的因素。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了接受TACE治疗的BCLC B/C期HCC患者,并进行了基线和至少两次TACE后albi评分测量。使用基于组的轨迹建模(GBTM)来识别不同的albi评分轨迹。比较不同轨迹组的临床结果和患者特征。基于catboost的临床预测模型用于识别影响albi评分轨迹的因素,Shapley加性解释(SHAP)值提供特征重要性解释。结果:在501例患者中,确定了三种albi评分轨迹:改善、稳定和下降。与稳定组和下降组相比,改善组有更好的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。多因素分析证实albi评分轨迹是OS的独立危险因素。亚组分析表明,TACE加全身治疗降低了稳定组和衰退组的死亡风险。CatBoost模型有效地区分了不同的轨迹组,SHAP分析突出了albi分级、Child-Pugh分级和肿瘤数量作为关键预测因子。结论:tace后albi评分轨迹与临床结果密切相关,肝功能改善与预后改善相关。监测这些轨迹可以指导肝癌患者接受TACE的个性化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信