Effect of Superior Vena Cava Isolation Added to Pulmonary Vein Isolation on the Postprocedural Heart Rates of Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kodai Negishi, Ken Okumura, Hideharu Okamatsu, Takuo Tsurugi, Yasuaki Tanaka, Koichi Nakao, Tomohiro Sakamoto, Junjiro Koyama, Hirofumi Tomita
{"title":"Effect of Superior Vena Cava Isolation Added to Pulmonary Vein Isolation on the Postprocedural Heart Rates of Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Kodai Negishi, Ken Okumura, Hideharu Okamatsu, Takuo Tsurugi, Yasuaki Tanaka, Koichi Nakao, Tomohiro Sakamoto, Junjiro Koyama, Hirofumi Tomita","doi":"10.1111/jce.16699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is often associated with an increased resting heart rate (rHR) due to neuromodulation of the cardiac autonomic plexus. Changes in the rHR by adding superior vena cava (SVC) isolation (SVCI) to PVI have not been fully elucidated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 257 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing ablation index-guided AF ablation from January 2021 to June 2022. In patients with SVC myocardial sleeve ≥ 20 mm above the sinus node, circumferential SVCI was added. Consequently, PVI only was done in 110 patients and PVI plus SVCI was in 147 patients. We analyzed rHRs obtained at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the ablation procedure using a linear mixed-effects model. Predictors of increases in rHRs > 20% from baseline values were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The characteristics of the patients with PVI only versus PVI + SVCI were as follows: mean age, 70.2 ± 10.6 versus 65.3 ± 10.3 years, respectively (p < 0.001); percentage of females, 44.5% versus 28.6%, respectively (p = 0.009); and baseline rHR, 62.5 ± 11.4 versus 61.0 ± 9.2 beats/minute, respectively (p = 0.239). At 1 month after the procedure, PVI + SVCI patients had a significantly higher rHR by 9.04 beats/minute (95% confidence interval [CI, 6.57-11.51], p < 0.01) compared to PVI-only and maintained significantly increased rHRs throughout the 12-month period. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SVCI added to PVI had a positive impact on rHRs increase > 20% (odds ratio [OR], 3.59 [95% CI 2.09-6.18], p < 0.001), while beta-blockers showed a negative impact (OR, 0.51 [95% CI 0.30-0.87], p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of SVCI to PVI led to increases in rHRs, presumably because of additional modulation of the cardiac autonomic plexus.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is often associated with an increased resting heart rate (rHR) due to neuromodulation of the cardiac autonomic plexus. Changes in the rHR by adding superior vena cava (SVC) isolation (SVCI) to PVI have not been fully elucidated.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 257 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing ablation index-guided AF ablation from January 2021 to June 2022. In patients with SVC myocardial sleeve ≥ 20 mm above the sinus node, circumferential SVCI was added. Consequently, PVI only was done in 110 patients and PVI plus SVCI was in 147 patients. We analyzed rHRs obtained at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the ablation procedure using a linear mixed-effects model. Predictors of increases in rHRs > 20% from baseline values were also examined.

Results: The characteristics of the patients with PVI only versus PVI + SVCI were as follows: mean age, 70.2 ± 10.6 versus 65.3 ± 10.3 years, respectively (p < 0.001); percentage of females, 44.5% versus 28.6%, respectively (p = 0.009); and baseline rHR, 62.5 ± 11.4 versus 61.0 ± 9.2 beats/minute, respectively (p = 0.239). At 1 month after the procedure, PVI + SVCI patients had a significantly higher rHR by 9.04 beats/minute (95% confidence interval [CI, 6.57-11.51], p < 0.01) compared to PVI-only and maintained significantly increased rHRs throughout the 12-month period. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SVCI added to PVI had a positive impact on rHRs increase > 20% (odds ratio [OR], 3.59 [95% CI 2.09-6.18], p < 0.001), while beta-blockers showed a negative impact (OR, 0.51 [95% CI 0.30-0.87], p = 0.01).

Conclusion: The addition of SVCI to PVI led to increases in rHRs, presumably because of additional modulation of the cardiac autonomic plexus.

上腔静脉隔离加肺静脉隔离对阵发性心房颤动患者术后心率的影响。
背景:由于心脏自主神经丛的神经调节,阵发性心房颤动(AF)的肺静脉隔离(PVI)通常与静息心率(rHR)增加相关。在PVI中加入上腔静脉(SVC)分离(SVCI)对rHR的影响尚未完全阐明。方法:我们回顾性分析了2021年1月至2022年6月257例连续接受消融指数引导的房颤消融的阵发性房颤患者。对于窦房结以上≥20mm的SVC心肌套筒患者,加周向SVCI。因此,仅110例患者行PVI, 147例患者行PVI + SVCI。我们使用线性混合效应模型分析了基线和消融手术后1、3、6和12个月的rrr。rrr较基线值增加20%的预测指标也进行了检查。结果:仅PVI与PVI + SVCI患者的特征如下:平均年龄分别为70.2±10.6岁和65.3±10.3岁(p < 20%)(优势比[OR], 3.59 [95% CI 2.09-6.18], p)结论:在PVI中加入SVCI导致rrr升高,可能是由于心脏自主神经丛的额外调节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信