Intervention Development to Promote Medical Adherence After Stem Cell Transplant.

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Donna M Posluszny, Arthur M Nezu, Dana H Bovbjerg, Karen L Syrjala, Mary Amanda Dew
{"title":"Intervention Development to Promote Medical Adherence After Stem Cell Transplant.","authors":"Donna M Posluszny, Arthur M Nezu, Dana H Bovbjerg, Karen L Syrjala, Mary Amanda Dew","doi":"10.1007/s10880-025-10078-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can be a lifesaving treatment for patients with hematologic disease. However, adherence to the post-HCT clinical regimen has many challenges that patients and their family caregivers must manage after hospital discharge. To address their needs, we developed a Dyadic Problem-Solving Therapy (DPST) intervention, then examined its feasibility and acceptability to patients and their family caregivers. Twelve patient-family caregiver dyads participated. Four dyads received DPST in person, four received it via online video conferencing. Another four received an enhanced usual care (EUC) intervention of the same length. Feasibility was assessed using completion rates, while acceptability was assessed using satisfaction ratings on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. DPST and EUC were both feasible (100% of dyads who started the intervention completed it) and acceptable with satisfaction ratings ranging from 3.6 to 4 for patients and 3.6-3.9 for family caregivers on a 1-4 scale for both DPST groups and ranging from 3.3 to 3.8 for EUC patients and 3.5-4 for EUC family caregivers. There were no evident differences by mode of intervention delivery. DPST, both in person and via video, appears feasible and acceptable for training patient-family caregiver dyads to manage challenges to adherence to the post-HCT regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10078-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can be a lifesaving treatment for patients with hematologic disease. However, adherence to the post-HCT clinical regimen has many challenges that patients and their family caregivers must manage after hospital discharge. To address their needs, we developed a Dyadic Problem-Solving Therapy (DPST) intervention, then examined its feasibility and acceptability to patients and their family caregivers. Twelve patient-family caregiver dyads participated. Four dyads received DPST in person, four received it via online video conferencing. Another four received an enhanced usual care (EUC) intervention of the same length. Feasibility was assessed using completion rates, while acceptability was assessed using satisfaction ratings on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. DPST and EUC were both feasible (100% of dyads who started the intervention completed it) and acceptable with satisfaction ratings ranging from 3.6 to 4 for patients and 3.6-3.9 for family caregivers on a 1-4 scale for both DPST groups and ranging from 3.3 to 3.8 for EUC patients and 3.5-4 for EUC family caregivers. There were no evident differences by mode of intervention delivery. DPST, both in person and via video, appears feasible and acceptable for training patient-family caregiver dyads to manage challenges to adherence to the post-HCT regimen.

促进干细胞移植后医疗依从性的干预发展。
同种异体造血细胞移植(HCT)可以挽救血液病患者的生命。然而,坚持hct后的临床方案有许多挑战,患者及其家庭照顾者必须在出院后管理。为了满足他们的需求,我们开发了一种二元问题解决疗法(DPST)干预,然后检查了其可行性和患者及其家庭照顾者的可接受性。12对患者-家庭照顾者参与了研究。四个人亲自接受DPST,四个人通过在线视频会议接受DPST。另外4名接受了同样长度的强化常规护理(EUC)干预。可行性评估使用完成率,而可接受性评估使用客户满意度问卷的满意度评级。DPST和EUC都是可行的(100%开始干预的夫妇完成了干预),并且在DPST组的满意度评分范围为3.6- 4,家庭照顾者满意度评分范围为3.6-3.9,EUC患者满意度评分范围为3.3 - 3.8,EUC家庭照顾者满意度评分范围为3.5-4。干预方式的不同无明显差异。DPST,无论是面对面的还是通过视频的,对于培训患者-家庭护理人员来应对坚持hct后治疗方案的挑战似乎是可行和可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信