The Economics of Telehealth: An Overview.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-12 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2025.0073
Kritee Gujral, Samantha Illarmo, Josephine C Jacobs, Todd H Wagner
{"title":"The Economics of Telehealth: An Overview.","authors":"Kritee Gujral, Samantha Illarmo, Josephine C Jacobs, Todd H Wagner","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2025.0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Telehealth has long offered promise for improving health care access, but due to restrictive regulations and technology limitations, historic use has been low. Despite telehealth's unprecedented expansion during the COVID-19 pandemic, economic questions remain, raising uncertainty about telehealth's future. <b>Methods:</b> We used an economics lens to conduct a narrative review of the vast medical literature and nascent economic literature on telehealth. We reviewed evidence on demand-side and supply-side forces influencing telehealth adoption and evidence on telehealth's impact on health care use, costs, effectiveness, and equity. <b>Results:</b> Current evidence is sparsely distributed across care types, telehealth modalities (e.g., phone, video, secure messaging), models of telehealth delivery, and pre- and post-pandemic periods. While the literature provides some signals that patients and clinicians are responsive to monetary costs of telehealth, more robust studies are needed, including studies on patient and provider time costs. Telehealth adoption appears to modestly increase outpatient care use, but evidence of its impact on costlier emergency or inpatient care use is needed. There is a lack of studies on monetary costs of telehealth, particularly the impact of telehealth on production costs. Importantly, there is a lack of high-quality studies on the comparative effectiveness of modalities. While there is a growing literature on disparities, studies that address confounders are needed to assess if telehealth can deliver on its promise to improve access for underserved populations. <b>Conclusion</b>: Our review paves the way for a stronger economics literature on telehealth, highlighting areas of future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":"1074-1095"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telehealth has long offered promise for improving health care access, but due to restrictive regulations and technology limitations, historic use has been low. Despite telehealth's unprecedented expansion during the COVID-19 pandemic, economic questions remain, raising uncertainty about telehealth's future. Methods: We used an economics lens to conduct a narrative review of the vast medical literature and nascent economic literature on telehealth. We reviewed evidence on demand-side and supply-side forces influencing telehealth adoption and evidence on telehealth's impact on health care use, costs, effectiveness, and equity. Results: Current evidence is sparsely distributed across care types, telehealth modalities (e.g., phone, video, secure messaging), models of telehealth delivery, and pre- and post-pandemic periods. While the literature provides some signals that patients and clinicians are responsive to monetary costs of telehealth, more robust studies are needed, including studies on patient and provider time costs. Telehealth adoption appears to modestly increase outpatient care use, but evidence of its impact on costlier emergency or inpatient care use is needed. There is a lack of studies on monetary costs of telehealth, particularly the impact of telehealth on production costs. Importantly, there is a lack of high-quality studies on the comparative effectiveness of modalities. While there is a growing literature on disparities, studies that address confounders are needed to assess if telehealth can deliver on its promise to improve access for underserved populations. Conclusion: Our review paves the way for a stronger economics literature on telehealth, highlighting areas of future research.

远程医疗经济学:概述。
背景:远程医疗长期以来为改善医疗保健服务提供了希望,但由于限制性法规和技术限制,历史上的使用一直很低。尽管在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间远程医疗实现了前所未有的扩张,但经济问题依然存在,给远程医疗的未来带来了不确定性。方法:我们用经济学的视角对大量的医学文献和新兴的远程医疗经济学文献进行了叙述回顾。我们审查了影响远程医疗采用的需求方和供给方力量的证据,以及远程医疗对医疗保健使用、成本、有效性和公平性的影响的证据。结果:目前的证据在护理类型、远程保健模式(例如,电话、视频、安全消息传递)、远程保健提供模式以及大流行前后时期分布稀疏。虽然文献提供了一些信号,表明患者和临床医生对远程保健的金钱成本有反应,但需要进行更有力的研究,包括对患者和提供者时间成本的研究。远程医疗的采用似乎适度地增加了门诊护理的使用,但需要证据证明其对昂贵的急诊或住院护理使用的影响。缺乏关于远程保健的货币成本,特别是远程保健对生产成本的影响的研究。重要的是,缺乏高质量的关于各种治疗方式比较有效性的研究。虽然关于差距的文献越来越多,但仍需要研究解决混杂因素的问题,以评估远程保健是否能够兑现承诺,改善服务不足人口的获取机会。结论:我们的综述为更强大的远程医疗经济学文献铺平了道路,突出了未来的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信