Trajectory of Global Mental Health and Global Physical Health in Breast Cancer Survivorship.

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Stephanie L Pritzl, Robert A Vierkant, Kathryn J Ruddy, Daniela L Stan, Nicole L Larson, Janet E Olson, Fergus J Couch, Alexandra S Higgins, Shawna L Ehlers
{"title":"Trajectory of Global Mental Health and Global Physical Health in Breast Cancer Survivorship.","authors":"Stephanie L Pritzl, Robert A Vierkant, Kathryn J Ruddy, Daniela L Stan, Nicole L Larson, Janet E Olson, Fergus J Couch, Alexandra S Higgins, Shawna L Ehlers","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer survivors face a risk of significant psychological distress, which can persist for years after their initial diagnosis. Although numerous guidelines and tools exist to help screen for and measure distress in patients with cancer, additional longitudinal studies are needed to better characterize the trajectory of distress over time.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a longitudinal study to evaluate distress and health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer. Annual assessments included global mental and physical health scores using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10), posttraumatic stress symptoms using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2). Eligible participants had stage 0-III breast cancer, with baseline surveys administered within 1 year of diagnosis. Annual follow-up surveys were conducted through year 4 after the baseline survey. Only patients who completed the baseline survey and at least one follow-up survey were included in this analysis. Individuals with stage IV or recurrent breast cancer were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,140 individuals were included. Over time, global mental health scores declined slightly, with differences in T-scores from baseline ranging from 0.4 to 0.9. In contrast, global physical health scores improved, with differences in T-scores ranging from 0.3 to 0.6. Mean scores remained in the normative range. Depressive symptoms remained stable throughout the study period, while posttraumatic stress symptoms showed improvement over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides important longitudinal data on distress subtypes in breast cancer survivors with nonmetastatic disease. Although global mental health declined slightly, depression symptoms remained stable, and posttraumatic stress symptoms improved. Investigation of distress subtypes over time merits further study to advance detection of significant distress across the cancer continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 5","pages":"141-146"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer survivors face a risk of significant psychological distress, which can persist for years after their initial diagnosis. Although numerous guidelines and tools exist to help screen for and measure distress in patients with cancer, additional longitudinal studies are needed to better characterize the trajectory of distress over time.

Patients and methods: We conducted a longitudinal study to evaluate distress and health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer. Annual assessments included global mental and physical health scores using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10), posttraumatic stress symptoms using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2). Eligible participants had stage 0-III breast cancer, with baseline surveys administered within 1 year of diagnosis. Annual follow-up surveys were conducted through year 4 after the baseline survey. Only patients who completed the baseline survey and at least one follow-up survey were included in this analysis. Individuals with stage IV or recurrent breast cancer were excluded.

Results: A total of 2,140 individuals were included. Over time, global mental health scores declined slightly, with differences in T-scores from baseline ranging from 0.4 to 0.9. In contrast, global physical health scores improved, with differences in T-scores ranging from 0.3 to 0.6. Mean scores remained in the normative range. Depressive symptoms remained stable throughout the study period, while posttraumatic stress symptoms showed improvement over time.

Conclusions: This study provides important longitudinal data on distress subtypes in breast cancer survivors with nonmetastatic disease. Although global mental health declined slightly, depression symptoms remained stable, and posttraumatic stress symptoms improved. Investigation of distress subtypes over time merits further study to advance detection of significant distress across the cancer continuum.

乳腺癌幸存者的整体心理健康和整体身体健康轨迹
背景:乳腺癌幸存者面临着显著的心理困扰的风险,这可能在他们最初的诊断后持续数年。尽管存在许多指导方针和工具来帮助筛查和测量癌症患者的痛苦,但需要额外的纵向研究来更好地描述痛苦随时间的变化轨迹。患者和方法:我们进行了一项纵向研究,以评估乳腺癌患者的痛苦和健康相关的生活质量。年度评估包括使用患者报告结果测量信息系统global -10(承诺-10)的全球精神和身体健康评分,使用事件影响量表修订(IES-R)的创伤后应激症状,以及使用患者健康问卷-2 (PHQ-2)的抑郁症状。符合条件的参与者患有0-III期乳腺癌,在诊断1年内进行基线调查。在基线调查后的第4年进行年度随访调查。只有完成基线调查和至少一次随访调查的患者被纳入本分析。排除了四期或复发性乳腺癌患者。结果:共纳入2140人。随着时间的推移,全球心理健康得分略有下降,t得分与基线的差异从0.4到0.9不等。相比之下,整体身体健康得分有所提高,t得分的差异在0.3到0.6之间。平均分数保持在标准范围内。在整个研究期间,抑郁症状保持稳定,而创伤后应激症状随着时间的推移而改善。结论:本研究为非转移性乳腺癌幸存者的痛苦亚型提供了重要的纵向数据。尽管全球心理健康状况略有下降,但抑郁症状保持稳定,创伤后应激症状有所改善。随着时间的推移,对痛苦亚型的调查值得进一步研究,以促进在癌症连续体中发现显著的痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信