Understanding the complexities of financial support for students in grant-funded STEMM training programs.

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Frontiers in Education Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.3389/feduc.2025.1445151
Ana L Romero, Krystle P Cobian, Patricia A Martín
{"title":"Understanding the complexities of financial support for students in grant-funded STEMM training programs.","authors":"Ana L Romero, Krystle P Cobian, Patricia A Martín","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2025.1445151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are lessons to be learned from campuses providing financial support to students involved in grant-funded science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) training initiatives. We examine students' perspectives on financial support from the Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) program, funded by the National Institutes of Health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed qualitative data collected from 122 BUILD undergraduate participants during site visits to the 10 NIH-sponsored BUILD programs using generic qualitative inquiry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) to guide qualitative data analysis, we found that students perceived BUILD funding to reduce financial stress and increase access to career training; however, the impact of aid was hampered by limitations in funding and financial aid processes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings from this study reveal that financial support from BUILD often facilitated college entry and participation in biomedical research training experiences for students. While students viewed financial support as beneficial to their academic and professional trajectory, they also noted challenges with financial aid processes on campus. This study has implications for federal funding agencies, foundations, and higher education institutions, specifically in developing innovative disbursement processes to improve support and to reduce unintended harmful consequences for student recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":52290,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":"10 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1445151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are lessons to be learned from campuses providing financial support to students involved in grant-funded science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) training initiatives. We examine students' perspectives on financial support from the Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) program, funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Methods: We analyzed qualitative data collected from 122 BUILD undergraduate participants during site visits to the 10 NIH-sponsored BUILD programs using generic qualitative inquiry.

Results: Using Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) to guide qualitative data analysis, we found that students perceived BUILD funding to reduce financial stress and increase access to career training; however, the impact of aid was hampered by limitations in funding and financial aid processes.

Discussion: Findings from this study reveal that financial support from BUILD often facilitated college entry and participation in biomedical research training experiences for students. While students viewed financial support as beneficial to their academic and professional trajectory, they also noted challenges with financial aid processes on campus. This study has implications for federal funding agencies, foundations, and higher education institutions, specifically in developing innovative disbursement processes to improve support and to reduce unintended harmful consequences for student recipients.

了解资助stem培训项目的学生财政支持的复杂性。
导言:校园为参与科学、技术、工程、数学和医学(STEMM)培训计划的学生提供财政支持,可以从中吸取教训。我们研究了学生对由美国国立卫生研究院资助的建设基础设施导致多样性(BUILD)计划的财政支持的观点。方法:我们使用一般定性调查方法,分析了在10个nih赞助的BUILD项目的现场访问中收集的122名BUILD本科生的定性数据。结果:运用社会认知职业理论(SCCT)指导定性数据分析,我们发现学生认为BUILD资助减轻了财务压力,增加了职业培训的机会;但是,由于资金和财政援助过程的限制,援助的影响受到阻碍。讨论:本研究的结果表明,BUILD的财政支持往往有助于学生进入大学和参与生物医学研究培训经历。虽然学生们认为经济支持有利于他们的学术和职业发展,但他们也指出了校园经济援助过程中的挑战。这项研究对联邦资助机构、基金会和高等教育机构具有启示意义,特别是在开发创新的支付流程以改善支持并减少对学生接受者的意外有害后果方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Education
Frontiers in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
887
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信