Nomogram to predict late extraluminal postpancreatectomy hemorrhage in patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-31 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.21037/gs-24-412
Yichen Li, Haoqi Zhang, Jun Gong, Yue Jian, Siyu Li, Yuxin Yang, Zhenjiang Zheng, Yonghua Chen, Xing Wang, Xubao Liu, Shanmiao Gou, Chunlu Tan
{"title":"Nomogram to predict late extraluminal postpancreatectomy hemorrhage in patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.","authors":"Yichen Li, Haoqi Zhang, Jun Gong, Yue Jian, Siyu Li, Yuxin Yang, Zhenjiang Zheng, Yonghua Chen, Xing Wang, Xubao Liu, Shanmiao Gou, Chunlu Tan","doi":"10.21037/gs-24-412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Late extraluminal postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (LEPPH) is a rare but severe complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Current predictors of LEPPH are limited and cannot quantify bleeding risk. As a consequence, establishment of a prediction model of LEPPH is important. This study aims to construct a nomogram combining perioperative factors to predict LEPPH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2,924 retrospective and 467 prospective cases undergoing PD, 420 retrospective cases and 131 prospective cases with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after PD from three centers were included. Three hundred and seventy-one retrospective cases from West China Hospital were divided randomly into the development cohort (n=259) and the internal validation cohort (n=112). Another 180 patients consisting of 49 retrospective and 131 prospective cases from three pancreatic centers were enrolled as the external validation set. A nomogram was established based on the independent risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariable analysis identified pancreaticoenteric anastomotic dorsal fluid accumulation, bubble sign, pancreaticoenteric anastomotic cracking (PEAC), surgery-related acute pancreatitis (AP), and positive culture in intra-abdominal drainage fluid as independent risk factors of LEPPH. Combined with those variables, the nomogram showed reliable C-index of 0.932, 0.924 and 0.954 in predicting LEPPH in the three cohorts respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The nomogram exhibited excellent predictive capabilities for LEPPH after PD. It could aid surgeons in early identification of patients prone to LEPPH following PD, enabling timely interventions and improving patient survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"14 3","pages":"281-293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Late extraluminal postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (LEPPH) is a rare but severe complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Current predictors of LEPPH are limited and cannot quantify bleeding risk. As a consequence, establishment of a prediction model of LEPPH is important. This study aims to construct a nomogram combining perioperative factors to predict LEPPH.

Methods: A total of 2,924 retrospective and 467 prospective cases undergoing PD, 420 retrospective cases and 131 prospective cases with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after PD from three centers were included. Three hundred and seventy-one retrospective cases from West China Hospital were divided randomly into the development cohort (n=259) and the internal validation cohort (n=112). Another 180 patients consisting of 49 retrospective and 131 prospective cases from three pancreatic centers were enrolled as the external validation set. A nomogram was established based on the independent risk factors.

Results: Multivariable analysis identified pancreaticoenteric anastomotic dorsal fluid accumulation, bubble sign, pancreaticoenteric anastomotic cracking (PEAC), surgery-related acute pancreatitis (AP), and positive culture in intra-abdominal drainage fluid as independent risk factors of LEPPH. Combined with those variables, the nomogram showed reliable C-index of 0.932, 0.924 and 0.954 in predicting LEPPH in the three cohorts respectively.

Conclusions: The nomogram exhibited excellent predictive capabilities for LEPPH after PD. It could aid surgeons in early identification of patients prone to LEPPH following PD, enabling timely interventions and improving patient survival.

Nomogram预测胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘患者晚期腔外出血。
背景:胰十二指肠切除术后晚期腔外出血(LEPPH)是一种罕见但严重的并发症。目前LEPPH的预测指标有限,无法量化出血风险。因此,建立LEPPH预测模型具有重要意义。本研究旨在结合围手术期因素构建预测LEPPH的nomogram。方法:选取三个中心共2924例PD回顾性病例和467例前瞻性病例,420例回顾性病例和131例术后胰瘘(POPF)前瞻性病例。回顾性分析华西医院病例371例,随机分为发展组(n=259)和内部验证组(n=112)。另外180例患者,包括49例回顾性病例和131例前瞻性病例,来自三个胰腺中心被纳入外部验证组。基于独立危险因素建立了nomogram。结果:多变量分析确定胰肠吻合器背侧积液、泡征、胰肠吻合器破裂(PEAC)、手术相关性急性胰腺炎(AP)、腹内引流液培养阳性为LEPPH的独立危险因素。综合这些变量,方差图显示3个队列预测LEPPH的可靠c指数分别为0.932、0.924和0.954。结论:nomogram对PD后LEPPH具有较好的预测能力。它可以帮助外科医生早期识别PD后易发生LEPPH的患者,及时干预,提高患者生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信