Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review-Driven Consensus Guideline from the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.

IF 4 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Meghan E McGarry, Karen S Raraigh, Philip Farrell, Faith Shropshire, Karey Padding, Cambrey White, M Christine Dorley, Steven Hicks, Clement L Ren, Kathryn Tullis, Debra Freedenberg, Q Eileen Wafford, Sarah E Hempstead, Marissa A Taylor, Albert Faro, Marci K Sontag, Susanna A McColley
{"title":"Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review-Driven Consensus Guideline from the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.","authors":"Meghan E McGarry, Karen S Raraigh, Philip Farrell, Faith Shropshire, Karey Padding, Cambrey White, M Christine Dorley, Steven Hicks, Clement L Ren, Kathryn Tullis, Debra Freedenberg, Q Eileen Wafford, Sarah E Hempstead, Marissa A Taylor, Albert Faro, Marci K Sontag, Susanna A McColley","doi":"10.3390/ijns11020024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been universal in the US since 2010; however, there is significant variation among newborn screening algorithms. Systematic reviews were used to develop seven recommendations for newborn screening program practices to improve timeliness, sensitivity, and equity in diagnosing infants with CF: (1) The CF Foundation recommends the use of a floating immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) cutoff over a fixed IRT cutoff; (2) The CF Foundation recommends using a very high IRT referral strategy in CF newborn screening programs whose variant panel does not include all CF-causing variants in CFTR2 or does not have a variant panel that achieves at least 95% sensitivity in all ancestral groups within the state; (3) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening algorithms should not limit <i>CFTR</i> variant detection to the F508del variant or variants included in the American College of Medical Genetics-23 panel; (4) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening programs screen for all CF-causing <i>CFTR</i> variants in CFTR2; (5) The CF Foundation recommends conducting <i>CFTR</i> variant screening twice weekly or more frequently as resources allow; (6) The CF Foundation recommends the inclusion of a <i>CFTR</i> sequencing tier following IRT and <i>CFTR</i> variant panel testing to improve the specificity and positive predictive value of CF newborn screening; (7) The CF Foundation recommends that both the primary care provider and the CF specialist be notified of abnormal newborn screening results. Through implementation, it is anticipated that these recommendations will result in improved sensitivity, equity, and timeliness of CF newborn screening, leading to improved health outcomes for all individuals diagnosed with CF following newborn screening and a decreased burden on families.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been universal in the US since 2010; however, there is significant variation among newborn screening algorithms. Systematic reviews were used to develop seven recommendations for newborn screening program practices to improve timeliness, sensitivity, and equity in diagnosing infants with CF: (1) The CF Foundation recommends the use of a floating immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) cutoff over a fixed IRT cutoff; (2) The CF Foundation recommends using a very high IRT referral strategy in CF newborn screening programs whose variant panel does not include all CF-causing variants in CFTR2 or does not have a variant panel that achieves at least 95% sensitivity in all ancestral groups within the state; (3) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening algorithms should not limit CFTR variant detection to the F508del variant or variants included in the American College of Medical Genetics-23 panel; (4) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening programs screen for all CF-causing CFTR variants in CFTR2; (5) The CF Foundation recommends conducting CFTR variant screening twice weekly or more frequently as resources allow; (6) The CF Foundation recommends the inclusion of a CFTR sequencing tier following IRT and CFTR variant panel testing to improve the specificity and positive predictive value of CF newborn screening; (7) The CF Foundation recommends that both the primary care provider and the CF specialist be notified of abnormal newborn screening results. Through implementation, it is anticipated that these recommendations will result in improved sensitivity, equity, and timeliness of CF newborn screening, leading to improved health outcomes for all individuals diagnosed with CF following newborn screening and a decreased burden on families.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新生儿囊性纤维化筛查:美国囊性纤维化基金会系统评价驱动的共识指南。
自2010年以来,新生儿囊性纤维化(CF)筛查在美国已经普及;然而,新生儿筛查算法之间存在显著差异。系统评价为新生儿筛查项目实践提出了7项建议,以提高诊断CF婴儿的及时性、敏感性和公平性:(1)CF基金会建议使用浮动免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原(IRT)截止点,而不是固定IRT截止点;(2) CF基金会建议在CF新生儿筛查项目中使用非常高的IRT转诊策略,这些项目的变异面板不包括所有CF引起的CFTR2变异,或者没有在该州所有祖先群体中达到至少95%敏感性的变异面板;(3) CF基金会建议CF新生儿筛查算法不应将CFTR变异检测限制在F508del变异或美国医学遗传学学会-23小组中包含的变异;(4) CF基金会建议CF新生儿筛查项目在CFTR2中筛查所有导致CF的CFTR变异;(5)如果资源允许,CF基金会建议每周进行两次或更频繁的CFTR变异筛查;(6) CF基金会建议在IRT和CFTR变异面板检测后加入CFTR测序层,以提高CF新生儿筛查的特异性和阳性预测值;(7) CF基金会建议,如果新生儿筛查结果异常,应通知初级保健提供者和CF专家。通过实施,预计这些建议将提高CF新生儿筛查的敏感性、公平性和及时性,从而改善所有在新生儿筛查后被诊断为CF的个体的健康结果,并减轻家庭负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
International Journal of Neonatal Screening Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信