Machine stability and dosimetry for ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy human clinical protocol

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Patrik Gonçalves Jorge, Reiner Geyer, Rémy Kinj, Luis Schiappacasse, Wendy Jeanneret-Sozzi, Jean Bourhis, Fernanda Herrera, François Bochud, Claude Bailat, Raphaël Moeckli
{"title":"Machine stability and dosimetry for ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy human clinical protocol","authors":"Patrik Gonçalves Jorge,&nbsp;Reiner Geyer,&nbsp;Rémy Kinj,&nbsp;Luis Schiappacasse,&nbsp;Wendy Jeanneret-Sozzi,&nbsp;Jean Bourhis,&nbsp;Fernanda Herrera,&nbsp;François Bochud,&nbsp;Claude Bailat,&nbsp;Raphaël Moeckli","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The FLASH effect, induced by ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiations, offers the potential to spare normal tissue while effectively treating tumors. It is important to achieve precise and accurate dose delivery and to establish reliable detector systems, particularly for clinical trials needed to help the clinical transfer of FLASH-Radiotherapy (FLASH-RT). However, the use of monitoring chambers with UHDR beams is presently limited, leading to the reliance on passive dosimetry and machine stability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the energy and output stability of a UHDR Mobetron (IntraOp, USA) and to compare it with its conventional dose rate (CDR) mode. Furthermore, we assessed the dosimetric accuracy of a human clinical protocol for FLASH-RT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Over a 26-month duration, we assessed the short- and long-term stability of the output and energy of the Mobetron system. Daily checks were conducted for 9 MeV CDR and UHDR. In parallel, the IMPulse clinical trial involving patients with skin metastases from melanoma was initiated. Prescription doses ranging from 22 to 28 Gy were administered. Pre-, post-, and <i>in vivo</i> dosimetry using alanine and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) was performed and compared to the prescription doses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Short-term output fluctuations remained below 0.6 % and 1 % for 9 MeV CDR and UHDR, respectively. Long-term output fluctuations were within 2 % and the long-term energy fluctuations were below 2 mm (R<sub>50</sub>) for both modes. The delivered doses of the IMPulse trial showed deviations below 4 % compared to prescription doses for all patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Mobetron system demonstrated favorable short- and long-term stability. There was a good agreement between the prescribed and the measured dose for the clinical IMPulse trial. The stability of this UHDR machine allows us to effectively conduct human clinical protocols as well as preclinical experiments, even in the absence of a real-time monitoring system.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The FLASH effect, induced by ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiations, offers the potential to spare normal tissue while effectively treating tumors. It is important to achieve precise and accurate dose delivery and to establish reliable detector systems, particularly for clinical trials needed to help the clinical transfer of FLASH-Radiotherapy (FLASH-RT). However, the use of monitoring chambers with UHDR beams is presently limited, leading to the reliance on passive dosimetry and machine stability.

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the energy and output stability of a UHDR Mobetron (IntraOp, USA) and to compare it with its conventional dose rate (CDR) mode. Furthermore, we assessed the dosimetric accuracy of a human clinical protocol for FLASH-RT.

Methods

Over a 26-month duration, we assessed the short- and long-term stability of the output and energy of the Mobetron system. Daily checks were conducted for 9 MeV CDR and UHDR. In parallel, the IMPulse clinical trial involving patients with skin metastases from melanoma was initiated. Prescription doses ranging from 22 to 28 Gy were administered. Pre-, post-, and in vivo dosimetry using alanine and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) was performed and compared to the prescription doses.

Results

Short-term output fluctuations remained below 0.6 % and 1 % for 9 MeV CDR and UHDR, respectively. Long-term output fluctuations were within 2 % and the long-term energy fluctuations were below 2 mm (R50) for both modes. The delivered doses of the IMPulse trial showed deviations below 4 % compared to prescription doses for all patients.

Conclusions

The Mobetron system demonstrated favorable short- and long-term stability. There was a good agreement between the prescribed and the measured dose for the clinical IMPulse trial. The stability of this UHDR machine allows us to effectively conduct human clinical protocols as well as preclinical experiments, even in the absence of a real-time monitoring system.

超高剂量率FLASH放射治疗人体临床方案的机器稳定性和剂量学。
背景:由超高剂量率(UHDR)照射诱导的FLASH效应,提供了在有效治疗肿瘤的同时保护正常组织的潜力。实现精确和准确的剂量递送和建立可靠的探测器系统非常重要,特别是对于帮助临床转移flash -放疗(FLASH-RT)所需的临床试验。然而,目前使用UHDR光束的监测室是有限的,导致对被动剂量测定和机器稳定性的依赖。目的:研究UHDR Mobetron (IntraOp, USA)的能量和输出稳定性,并将其与常规剂量率(CDR)模式进行比较。此外,我们评估了FLASH-RT人类临床方案的剂量学准确性。方法:在26个月的时间里,我们评估了Mobetron系统的输出和能量的短期和长期稳定性。每日检查9mev CDR和UHDR。与此同时,针对黑色素瘤皮肤转移患者的IMPulse临床试验也启动了。处方剂量为22至28 Gy。使用丙氨酸和热释光剂量计(TLDs)进行了前后和体内剂量测定,并与处方剂量进行了比较。结果:9mev CDR和UHDR的短期产出波动分别保持在0.6%和1%以下。两种模式的长期输出波动均在2%以内,长期能量波动均在2mm (R50)以下。与所有患者的处方剂量相比,IMPulse试验的交付剂量偏差低于4%。结论:Mobetron系统具有良好的短期和长期稳定性。在IMPulse临床试验中,处方剂量和测量剂量之间有很好的一致性。这台UHDR机器的稳定性使我们能够有效地进行人体临床方案以及临床前实验,即使在没有实时监测系统的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信