Barriers, facilitators and implementation strategies to implement 'patient's own medication' and 'self-administration of medication' in hospitals.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elisabeth M Smale, Jessica van den Berg, Jennifer Korporaal-Heijman, Charlotte L Bekker, Bart J F van den Bemt
{"title":"Barriers, facilitators and implementation strategies to implement 'patient's own medication' and 'self-administration of medication' in hospitals.","authors":"Elisabeth M Smale, Jessica van den Berg, Jennifer Korporaal-Heijman, Charlotte L Bekker, Bart J F van den Bemt","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementing patient's own medication (POM) and self-administration of medication (SAM) has several benefits for safe and sustainable medication use, including enhanced patient empowerment reduced workload for hospital staff and decreased medication waste. Despite positive attitude of stakeholders, the upscaling of these strategies in hospitals remained limited. This study aimed to (i) identify barriers and facilitators for implementing POM and SAM and (ii) develop implementation strategies to address these.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted among healthcare providers involved in the implementation of POM and SAM in 10 Dutch hospitals. The study population encompassed (hospital and outpatient) pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, nurses, and (ward) physicians. The topic guide was based on COM-B model. Barriers and facilitators were identified with thematic content analysis and were categorized to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implementation strategies were selected based on identified barriers through the CFIR- Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) tool and identified strategies were clustered into predefined focus areas to develop implementation targets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 23 participants generally expressed a positive attitude towards implementation of POM and SAM. Themes reflecting facilitators related to (i) multiple benefits for patients, hospital, and society, (ii) a dedicated multidisciplinary implementation team, (iii) an iterative implementation process, whereas barriers related to (iv) substantial and invasive workflow changes, (v) reluctance to change responsibilities of healthcare providers, and (vi) unclear regulations and reimbursement. The CFIR-ERIC tool highlighted 57 implementation strategies in nine key focus areas to support the implementation of POM and SAM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To implement POM and PAM successfully, strategies relating to involving stakeholders, changing infrastructure, and using an iterative implementation process are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Implementing patient's own medication (POM) and self-administration of medication (SAM) has several benefits for safe and sustainable medication use, including enhanced patient empowerment reduced workload for hospital staff and decreased medication waste. Despite positive attitude of stakeholders, the upscaling of these strategies in hospitals remained limited. This study aimed to (i) identify barriers and facilitators for implementing POM and SAM and (ii) develop implementation strategies to address these.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted among healthcare providers involved in the implementation of POM and SAM in 10 Dutch hospitals. The study population encompassed (hospital and outpatient) pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, nurses, and (ward) physicians. The topic guide was based on COM-B model. Barriers and facilitators were identified with thematic content analysis and were categorized to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implementation strategies were selected based on identified barriers through the CFIR- Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) tool and identified strategies were clustered into predefined focus areas to develop implementation targets.

Results: The 23 participants generally expressed a positive attitude towards implementation of POM and SAM. Themes reflecting facilitators related to (i) multiple benefits for patients, hospital, and society, (ii) a dedicated multidisciplinary implementation team, (iii) an iterative implementation process, whereas barriers related to (iv) substantial and invasive workflow changes, (v) reluctance to change responsibilities of healthcare providers, and (vi) unclear regulations and reimbursement. The CFIR-ERIC tool highlighted 57 implementation strategies in nine key focus areas to support the implementation of POM and SAM.

Conclusion: To implement POM and PAM successfully, strategies relating to involving stakeholders, changing infrastructure, and using an iterative implementation process are required.

在医院实施“病人自己用药”和“自我用药”的障碍、促进因素和实施战略。
实施患者自己用药和自我用药对安全和可持续用药有几个好处,包括增强患者赋权,减少医院工作人员的工作量和减少药物浪费。尽管利益攸关方持积极态度,但这些战略在医院的推广仍然有限。本研究旨在(1)确定实施POM和SAM的障碍和促进因素,(2)制定实施策略来解决这些问题。方法采用半结构化访谈法,对荷兰10家医院中参与实施“病人自己用药”和“自我给药”的医护人员进行调查。研究人群包括(医院和门诊)药剂师、药学技术人员、护士和(病房)医生。主题指南基于COM-B模型。通过主题内容分析确定障碍和促进因素,并将其归类为实施研究综合框架(CFIR)。通过CFIR-实施变革的专家建议(ERIC)工具,根据确定的障碍选择实施战略,并将确定的战略聚集到预定义的重点领域,以制定实施目标。结果23名受访医师对“患者自用药”和“自我给药”的实施普遍持积极态度。反映促进因素的主题涉及(1)患者、医院和社会的多重利益,(2)专门的多学科实施团队,以及(3)迭代实施过程,而障碍涉及(4)实质性和侵入性的工作流程变化,(5)不愿改变医疗保健提供者的责任,以及(6)法规和报销不明确。CFIR-ERIC工具强调了9个重点领域的57个实施策略,以支持患者自行用药和自我给药的实施。结论要成功实施患者自主用药和自我用药,需要涉及利益相关者、改变基础设施和使用迭代实施过程的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信