Student Registered Nurse Anesthetists' Perceptions of Substance Use [Formula: see text].

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Karen J Foli, Anna K Forster, Loretta Ann Bostic, Zeyu Zhang, Lingsong Zhang, Linda Stone
{"title":"Student Registered Nurse Anesthetists' Perceptions of Substance Use [Formula: see text].","authors":"Karen J Foli, Anna K Forster, Loretta Ann Bostic, Zeyu Zhang, Lingsong Zhang, Linda Stone","doi":"10.1177/10783903251331229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses enrolled in certified registered nurse anesthetist programs are taught to be experts in complex pharmaceutical agents, often under high stakes conditions. Such conditions may create maladaptive coping mechanisms, such as substance use. However, exploration of student registered nurse anesthetists' (SRNAs) perceptions of substance use and drug diversion have only been minimally described in the literature.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aims were to (a) investigate SRNAs' ratings of the American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology's (AANA) recommended strategies to reduce drug diversion and (b) analyze qualitative responses to open-ended items related to the use of substances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Approximately 400 students responded to an online survey in March 2021. The survey was randomly sent to 3,000 SNRAs who were members of the AANA (return rate of 13%). Descriptive statistics and paired <i>t</i>-tests were calculated to determine differences between strategies viewed as effective and strategies that have been implemented. A descriptive content analysis was conducted to derive themes from four open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all 11 AANA strategies, the means for effectiveness were significantly higher than means for strategies that were implemented, indicating that strategies were seen as effective, but were not being implemented. The highest scored perceived effectiveness strategy was \"Creating a safe environment for prompt reporting.\" Themes captured a high-pressured, high-stakes educational environment, characterized by rigidity and incivility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policies to support a safe environment to encourage students to self-report substance use, an awareness of alternative-to-discipline programs, and reintegration into educational programs should be formulated and implemented by educational institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","volume":" ","pages":"209-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903251331229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nurses enrolled in certified registered nurse anesthetist programs are taught to be experts in complex pharmaceutical agents, often under high stakes conditions. Such conditions may create maladaptive coping mechanisms, such as substance use. However, exploration of student registered nurse anesthetists' (SRNAs) perceptions of substance use and drug diversion have only been minimally described in the literature.

Aims: The study aims were to (a) investigate SRNAs' ratings of the American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology's (AANA) recommended strategies to reduce drug diversion and (b) analyze qualitative responses to open-ended items related to the use of substances.

Methods: Approximately 400 students responded to an online survey in March 2021. The survey was randomly sent to 3,000 SNRAs who were members of the AANA (return rate of 13%). Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests were calculated to determine differences between strategies viewed as effective and strategies that have been implemented. A descriptive content analysis was conducted to derive themes from four open-ended questions.

Results: For all 11 AANA strategies, the means for effectiveness were significantly higher than means for strategies that were implemented, indicating that strategies were seen as effective, but were not being implemented. The highest scored perceived effectiveness strategy was "Creating a safe environment for prompt reporting." Themes captured a high-pressured, high-stakes educational environment, characterized by rigidity and incivility.

Conclusions: Policies to support a safe environment to encourage students to self-report substance use, an awareness of alternative-to-discipline programs, and reintegration into educational programs should be formulated and implemented by educational institutions.

麻醉师注册护士学生对药物使用的认知[公式:见正文]。
背景:注册护士麻醉师课程的护士被教导成为复杂药物制剂的专家,通常在高风险的条件下。这种情况可能造成适应不良的应对机制,例如物质使用。然而,探索学生注册护士麻醉师(SRNAs)的物质使用和药物转移的看法,只有最低限度的文献描述。目的:研究目的是(a)调查srna对美国护士麻醉学协会(AANA)建议的减少药物转移策略的评分,(b)分析与药物使用相关的开放式项目的定性反应。方法:约400名学生参与了2021年3月的在线调查。该调查是随机向参加AANA的3000名snra进行的(回复率为13%)。计算描述性统计和配对t检验,以确定被视为有效的策略和已实施的策略之间的差异。进行描述性内容分析,从四个开放式问题中得出主题。结果:对于所有11种AANA策略,有效性均值显著高于已实施策略均值,表明策略被视为有效,但未被实施。得分最高的有效策略是“为及时报告创造一个安全的环境”。主题捕捉了高压,高风险的教育环境,其特点是僵化和不文明。结论:教育机构应该制定和实施政策,以支持一个安全的环境,鼓励学生自我报告药物使用情况,意识到替代纪律计划,并重新融入教育计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal publishing up-to-date information to promote psychiatric nursing, improve mental health care for culturally diverse individuals, families, groups, and communities, as well as shape health care policy for the delivery of mental health services. JAPNA publishes both clinical and research articles relevant to psychiatric nursing. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书