Temporal trends in the treatment of relapsing minimal change podocytopathy - a binational cohort study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 TRANSPLANTATION
Tilde Kristensen, Rutger Maas, Henrik Birn, Per Ivarsen
{"title":"Temporal trends in the treatment of relapsing minimal change podocytopathy - a binational cohort study.","authors":"Tilde Kristensen, Rutger Maas, Henrik Birn, Per Ivarsen","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfaf072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>While the primary treatment for Minimal Change Disease (MCD) is prednisolone, the immunosuppressive treatment at relapse is less well-defined. More treatment options for MCD have become available and concerns about the adverse effects of prednisolone have been raised. It is unclear to what extent this has influenced the treatment of relapsing disease. Thus, the objective of this study is to characterize the changes in the immunosuppressive treatment of relapse in MCD over the past 35 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre, retrospective cohort including adult patients with biopsy-proven MCD from 13 hospitals in Denmark and the Netherlands between 1985 and 2022. Patients were identified from pathology registers. Information on treatment and clinical outcomes was retrieved from health records. Treatment before and after 2010 was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 239 patients with a median age of 46 years, 55% female and 64% being diagnosed before 2010. A first relapse was identified in 50% and a second relapse in 28%. The most frequently prescribed treatment at first relapse was prednisolone monotherapy before and after 2010 (67% and 44% of patients, respectively), while the use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) increased three-fold after 2010 compared to before 2010. At second relapse CNI was the most frequently prescribed treatment after 2010, while the use of both cyclophosphamide and prednisolone decreased when compared to before 2010. A similar trend was observed at the third to fourteenth relapse with CNI (44% of patients), and rituximab (35% of patients) being the most frequently prescribed treatments after 2010 while the use of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone decreased (0% and 21% of patients, respectively). Regardless of treatment remission rates remained high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment of relapses in MCD has changed since 2010 with reduced use of prednisolone monotherapy and cyclophosphamide, and increased use of CNI and rituximab.</p>","PeriodicalId":19078,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: While the primary treatment for Minimal Change Disease (MCD) is prednisolone, the immunosuppressive treatment at relapse is less well-defined. More treatment options for MCD have become available and concerns about the adverse effects of prednisolone have been raised. It is unclear to what extent this has influenced the treatment of relapsing disease. Thus, the objective of this study is to characterize the changes in the immunosuppressive treatment of relapse in MCD over the past 35 years.

Methods: A multicentre, retrospective cohort including adult patients with biopsy-proven MCD from 13 hospitals in Denmark and the Netherlands between 1985 and 2022. Patients were identified from pathology registers. Information on treatment and clinical outcomes was retrieved from health records. Treatment before and after 2010 was compared.

Results: The study included 239 patients with a median age of 46 years, 55% female and 64% being diagnosed before 2010. A first relapse was identified in 50% and a second relapse in 28%. The most frequently prescribed treatment at first relapse was prednisolone monotherapy before and after 2010 (67% and 44% of patients, respectively), while the use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) increased three-fold after 2010 compared to before 2010. At second relapse CNI was the most frequently prescribed treatment after 2010, while the use of both cyclophosphamide and prednisolone decreased when compared to before 2010. A similar trend was observed at the third to fourteenth relapse with CNI (44% of patients), and rituximab (35% of patients) being the most frequently prescribed treatments after 2010 while the use of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone decreased (0% and 21% of patients, respectively). Regardless of treatment remission rates remained high.

Conclusion: The treatment of relapses in MCD has changed since 2010 with reduced use of prednisolone monotherapy and cyclophosphamide, and increased use of CNI and rituximab.

复发性微小变化足细胞病治疗的时间趋势-一项两国队列研究。
背景和假设:虽然最小变化病(MCD)的主要治疗是强的松龙,但复发时的免疫抑制治疗不太明确。MCD的治疗选择越来越多,对强的松龙不良反应的担忧也越来越多。目前尚不清楚这在多大程度上影响了复发性疾病的治疗。因此,本研究的目的是表征过去35年来MCD复发免疫抑制治疗的变化。方法:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究,包括1985年至2022年间丹麦和荷兰13家医院活检证实的MCD成年患者。从病理记录中确定患者。从健康记录中检索了有关治疗和临床结果的信息。比较2010年前后的治疗情况。结果:该研究纳入239例患者,中位年龄46岁,55%为女性,64%在2010年之前确诊。首次复发的比例为50%,第二次复发的比例为28%。2010年前后首次复发时最常见的处方治疗是强的松龙单药治疗(分别为67%和44%的患者),而2010年后钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)的使用比2010年前增加了三倍。2010年后第二次复发时,CNI是最常用的处方治疗方法,而环磷酰胺和泼尼松龙的使用与2010年前相比有所减少。类似的趋势在第3 - 14次CNI复发(44%的患者)和利美昔单抗(35%的患者)是2010年后最常用的处方治疗,而环磷酰胺和泼尼松龙的使用减少(分别为0%和21%的患者)。不管怎样,缓解率仍然很高。结论:自2010年以来,MCD复发的治疗方法发生了变化,泼尼松龙单药和环磷酰胺的使用减少,CNI和利妥昔单抗的使用增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1431
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (ndt) is the leading nephrology journal in Europe and renowned worldwide, devoted to original clinical and laboratory research in nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. ndt is an official journal of the [ERA-EDTA](http://www.era-edta.org/) (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association). Published monthly, the journal provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians throughout the world. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review. Print ISSN: 0931-0509.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信