Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Navigating Diagnostic Complexities.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Floris V Raasveld, Margaux Wolff, Anna Luan, David Hao, Ian L Valerio, Kyle R Eberlin
{"title":"Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Navigating Diagnostic Complexities.","authors":"Floris V Raasveld, Margaux Wolff, Anna Luan, David Hao, Ian L Valerio, Kyle R Eberlin","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) presents significant diagnostic challenges due to its diverse clinical presentation. This study aims to describe the diagnostic trajectory of patients labeled with CRPS, focusing on referral patterns, application of the Budapest criteria, and accuracy of CRPS diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted of 53 patients treated for CRPS at a peripheral nerve clinic within a tertiary care center (2020-2024). Patient demographics, referral patterns, events leading to CRPS diagnosis, and diagnostic tests were analyzed. Three clinicians (two plastic surgeons, one pain medicine specialist) retrospectively assessed the validity of CRPS diagnoses using the Budapest criteria. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) for CRPS presence and type was calculated using Cohen's kappa (κ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 53 patients, the median time from the first mention of CRPS to referral to the nerve clinic was 1.3 years (IQR:0.4-3.6). The Budapest criteria had been assessed in 26% of patients pre-evaluation. In 33% of patients labeled with CRPS type I, an inciting nerve injury was identified. Following retrospective assessment, 42% of patients were determined to have CRPS by all raters, 26% were determined not to have CRPS, and 32% showed inconsistent agreement. The IRR for CRPS diagnosis and type ranged from minimal to moderate (κ=0.32-0.72).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings highlight variability in the application of the Budapest criteria for CRPS diagnosis, as well as inconsistencies in its retrospective application. Potentially treatable peripheral nerve injuries should be addressed prior to CRPS diagnosis. These findings may help improve early diagnostic assessment in patients with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) presents significant diagnostic challenges due to its diverse clinical presentation. This study aims to describe the diagnostic trajectory of patients labeled with CRPS, focusing on referral patterns, application of the Budapest criteria, and accuracy of CRPS diagnosis.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of 53 patients treated for CRPS at a peripheral nerve clinic within a tertiary care center (2020-2024). Patient demographics, referral patterns, events leading to CRPS diagnosis, and diagnostic tests were analyzed. Three clinicians (two plastic surgeons, one pain medicine specialist) retrospectively assessed the validity of CRPS diagnoses using the Budapest criteria. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) for CRPS presence and type was calculated using Cohen's kappa (κ).

Results: Among the 53 patients, the median time from the first mention of CRPS to referral to the nerve clinic was 1.3 years (IQR:0.4-3.6). The Budapest criteria had been assessed in 26% of patients pre-evaluation. In 33% of patients labeled with CRPS type I, an inciting nerve injury was identified. Following retrospective assessment, 42% of patients were determined to have CRPS by all raters, 26% were determined not to have CRPS, and 32% showed inconsistent agreement. The IRR for CRPS diagnosis and type ranged from minimal to moderate (κ=0.32-0.72).

Discussion: Our findings highlight variability in the application of the Budapest criteria for CRPS diagnosis, as well as inconsistencies in its retrospective application. Potentially treatable peripheral nerve injuries should be addressed prior to CRPS diagnosis. These findings may help improve early diagnostic assessment in patients with chronic pain.

复杂局部疼痛综合征:导航诊断复杂性。
目的:复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)由于其多样的临床表现,提出了重大的诊断挑战。本研究旨在描述CRPS患者的诊断轨迹,重点关注转诊模式、布达佩斯标准的应用以及CRPS诊断的准确性。方法:对某三级保健中心外周神经门诊收治的53例CRPS患者进行回顾性研究(2020-2024)。分析患者人口统计学、转诊模式、导致CRPS诊断的事件和诊断测试。三名临床医生(两名整形外科医生,一名疼痛医学专家)使用布达佩斯标准回顾性评估CRPS诊断的有效性。采用Cohen’s kappa (κ)计算CRPS存在和类型的评分间信度(IRR)。结果:53例患者中,从首次提及CRPS到转诊至神经门诊的中位时间为1.3年(IQR:0.4 ~ 3.6)。26%的患者接受了布达佩斯标准的预评估。在33%标记为CRPS I型的患者中,发现了刺激性神经损伤。经过回顾性评估,42%的患者被所有评分者确定为CRPS, 26%的患者被确定为无CRPS, 32%的患者表现出不一致的一致性。CRPS诊断和类型的IRR从最小到中等(κ=0.32-0.72)。讨论:我们的研究结果强调了布达佩斯标准在CRPS诊断应用中的可变性,以及其回顾性应用中的不一致性。潜在可治疗的周围神经损伤应在CRPS诊断前处理。这些发现可能有助于改善慢性疼痛患者的早期诊断评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信