Nonoperative treatment of the Boutonniere deformity: Is there a difference in outcomes?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Yixuan Tong, Megan Donnelly, Nader Paksima
{"title":"Nonoperative treatment of the Boutonniere deformity: Is there a difference in outcomes?","authors":"Yixuan Tong, Megan Donnelly, Nader Paksima","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2025.02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal nonoperative treatment for a Boutonniere deformity remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the effect of nonsurgical treatment methods on finger motion for Boutonniere deformities.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conservative treatments included hand therapy, orthotic wear, and home finger exercises. Digit range of motion (ROM) and injury characteristics also were evaluated. Based upon active ROM at the proximal interphalangeal joint, digits were graded as Poor, Good, or Excellent, and then a change in ROM grade was calculated from pre- to post-treatment for each digit. Standard statistical analyses were performed to evaluate for significant influences on changes in ROM grade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eleven digits (106 patients) were included. Traumatic injury was most common (87.4%). All digits but one received an orthotic. Average treatment and follow-up time was 14.6 weeks. Pre-treatment, there were 63 Poor, 29 Good, and 19 Excellent digits, with average total arc of motion of 47.3, 78.4, 84.2°, respectively (p < 0.01). Post-treatment, there were 28 Poor, 34 Good, and 49 Excellent digits, with average total arc of motion of 57.0, 81.4, 98.4°, respectively (p < 0.01). Forty nine digits had no change in ROM grade post-treatment, 37 had one grade of improvement, 18 had two grades of improvement, and seven had one grade worse. Across these four cohorts, digits that began treatment within 6 weeks of injury had the greatest amount of improvement (p = 0.02), whereas deformity from inflammatory arthritis were less likely to respond to treatment (p = 0.045). Otherwise, there were no differences in type or length of conservative treatment across cohorts (p > 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improvement in digit ROM was associated with initiation of treatment within 6 weeks, but not with any particular type or length of conservative treatment. One to two grades of ROM improvement can be achieved, although deformity can persist even after dedicated conservative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.02.013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal nonoperative treatment for a Boutonniere deformity remains controversial.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effect of nonsurgical treatment methods on finger motion for Boutonniere deformities.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Conservative treatments included hand therapy, orthotic wear, and home finger exercises. Digit range of motion (ROM) and injury characteristics also were evaluated. Based upon active ROM at the proximal interphalangeal joint, digits were graded as Poor, Good, or Excellent, and then a change in ROM grade was calculated from pre- to post-treatment for each digit. Standard statistical analyses were performed to evaluate for significant influences on changes in ROM grade.

Results: One hundred and eleven digits (106 patients) were included. Traumatic injury was most common (87.4%). All digits but one received an orthotic. Average treatment and follow-up time was 14.6 weeks. Pre-treatment, there were 63 Poor, 29 Good, and 19 Excellent digits, with average total arc of motion of 47.3, 78.4, 84.2°, respectively (p < 0.01). Post-treatment, there were 28 Poor, 34 Good, and 49 Excellent digits, with average total arc of motion of 57.0, 81.4, 98.4°, respectively (p < 0.01). Forty nine digits had no change in ROM grade post-treatment, 37 had one grade of improvement, 18 had two grades of improvement, and seven had one grade worse. Across these four cohorts, digits that began treatment within 6 weeks of injury had the greatest amount of improvement (p = 0.02), whereas deformity from inflammatory arthritis were less likely to respond to treatment (p = 0.045). Otherwise, there were no differences in type or length of conservative treatment across cohorts (p > 0.1).

Conclusions: Improvement in digit ROM was associated with initiation of treatment within 6 weeks, but not with any particular type or length of conservative treatment. One to two grades of ROM improvement can be achieved, although deformity can persist even after dedicated conservative management.

胸孔畸形的非手术治疗:结果有差异吗?
背景:胸孔畸形的最佳非手术治疗仍有争议。目的:探讨非手术治疗方法对钮孔畸形手指运动的影响。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:保守治疗包括手部治疗、佩戴矫形器和家庭手指锻炼。还评估了手指活动范围(ROM)和损伤特征。根据近端指间关节的活动ROM,将手指分为差、好或优,然后计算每个手指从治疗前到治疗后的ROM等级变化。采用标准统计分析来评估对ROM等级变化的显著影响。结果:纳入111根指骨(106例)。外伤性损伤最为常见(87.4%)。除了一个手指外,所有的手指都接受了矫正。平均治疗及随访时间14.6周。预处理前,63个差指,29个好指,19个优指,平均总活动弧度分别为47.3°,78.4°,84.2°(p 0.1)。结论:手指ROM的改善与6周内开始治疗有关,但与任何特定类型或长度的保守治疗无关。一到两个等级的ROM改善是可以实现的,尽管畸形在专门的保守治疗后仍然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信