Robotic Management of Diverticular Colovaginal and Colovesical Fistulas.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Amanda D Rebic, Dante L S Souza, Angela N Fellner, Hamza Guend
{"title":"Robotic Management of Diverticular Colovaginal and Colovesical Fistulas.","authors":"Amanda D Rebic, Dante L S Souza, Angela N Fellner, Hamza Guend","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Colovesical and colovaginal fistulas are a complication of diverticular disease that often requires surgical intervention. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved postoperative outcomes, but reported laparoscopic rates of conversion to open for these patients have been relatively high. There are limited studies evaluating robotic-assisted management of these fistulas. This study aims to report our single-center experience of robotic management of such fistulas, with the primary outcome being the conversion rate to open.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All elective robotic sigmoid resections for diverticular colovaginal and colovesical fistulas performed from January 2018 to August 2023 were included. Patient demographic variables and 30-day postoperative outcomes were retrospectively collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five patients were included, 21 with colovesical and 14 with colovaginal fistulas. Overall, the conversion to open rate was 8.6% (3 out of 35). All patients converted to open were patients with colovesical fistulas. Operating time (median of 354 vs 347 minutes, <i>P</i> = .583) and estimated blood loss (median of 100 vs 100 mL, <i>P</i> = .538) were similar for colovesical and colovaginal fistulas, respectively. Two patients required ostomy creation, both in the colovaginal group. Three patients in the colovesical group developed an ileus compared to one in the colovaginal group. There were 2 urinary tract infections (UTIs), both in the colovesical group. Thirty-day readmission (2 vs 1, <i>P</i> = .652) and length of stay (median 2 vs 2 days, <i>P</i> = .855) were similar for colovesical and colovaginal fistulas, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diverticular fistulas can be managed successfully with a robotic approach and appropriate surgeon experience, having minimal morbidity or complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Colovesical and colovaginal fistulas are a complication of diverticular disease that often requires surgical intervention. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved postoperative outcomes, but reported laparoscopic rates of conversion to open for these patients have been relatively high. There are limited studies evaluating robotic-assisted management of these fistulas. This study aims to report our single-center experience of robotic management of such fistulas, with the primary outcome being the conversion rate to open.

Methods: All elective robotic sigmoid resections for diverticular colovaginal and colovesical fistulas performed from January 2018 to August 2023 were included. Patient demographic variables and 30-day postoperative outcomes were retrospectively collected.

Results: Thirty-five patients were included, 21 with colovesical and 14 with colovaginal fistulas. Overall, the conversion to open rate was 8.6% (3 out of 35). All patients converted to open were patients with colovesical fistulas. Operating time (median of 354 vs 347 minutes, P = .583) and estimated blood loss (median of 100 vs 100 mL, P = .538) were similar for colovesical and colovaginal fistulas, respectively. Two patients required ostomy creation, both in the colovaginal group. Three patients in the colovesical group developed an ileus compared to one in the colovaginal group. There were 2 urinary tract infections (UTIs), both in the colovesical group. Thirty-day readmission (2 vs 1, P = .652) and length of stay (median 2 vs 2 days, P = .855) were similar for colovesical and colovaginal fistulas, respectively.

Conclusion: Diverticular fistulas can be managed successfully with a robotic approach and appropriate surgeon experience, having minimal morbidity or complications.

机器人治疗憩室、阴道瘘和膀胱瘘。
背景和目的:结肠和结肠阴道瘘是憩室疾病的并发症,通常需要手术干预。微创手术与术后预后的改善有关,但据报道,这些患者的腹腔镜转开率相对较高。评估机器人辅助管理这些瘘管的研究有限。本研究旨在报告我们的单中心机器人管理此类瘘管的经验,主要结果是转换率打开。方法:纳入2018年1月至2023年8月期间所有针对憩室性结肠阴道瘘和结肠膀胱瘘进行的选择性乙状结肠切除术。回顾性收集患者人口学变量和术后30天的结果。结果:本组共35例患者,其中结肠瘘21例,阴道瘘14例。总体而言,转化率为8.6%(35封邮件中有3封)。所有转为开腹的患者均为膀胱瘘患者。阴道瘘和阴道瘘的手术时间(中位数分别为354 vs 347分钟,P = 0.583)和估计失血量(中位数分别为100 vs 100 mL, P = 0.538)相似。2例患者需要造口术,均为阴道组。阴道组有3名患者出现肠梗阻,而阴道组只有1名。膀胱组2例尿路感染(uti)。膀胱瘘和阴道瘘的30天再入院时间(2天vs 1天,P = 0.652)和住院时间(中位数2天vs 2天,P = 0.855)相似。结论:憩室瘘管可以通过机器人入路和适当的外科医生经验成功治疗,发病率和并发症最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信