Safety and Efficacy of Magnetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Treating Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lora Brown, Emmanuel Gage, Harold Cordner, Leonardo Kapural, Jason Rosenberg, Marshall Bedder
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Magnetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Treating Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.","authors":"Lora Brown, Emmanuel Gage, Harold Cordner, Leonardo Kapural, Jason Rosenberg, Marshall Bedder","doi":"10.1016/j.neurom.2025.03.074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Current treatments for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) have variable effectiveness and known side effects. Noninvasive magnetic peripheral nerve stimulation (mPNS) provides effective pain relief without the side effects associated with interventional approaches. This study measured the differences in pain relief, sensory, and quality of life improvements using mPNS and conventional medical management (CMM) compared with sham and CMM in patients with PDN.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multicenter, randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2022 to November 2023. Patients were randomized to receive either mPNS and CMM or sham and CMM. Subjects were randomized to treatment groups in a 3:1 ratio to mPNS+CMM or Sham+CMM and observed for 30 days during the double-blinded phase (phase 1). At 30 days, the subjects in the Sham+CMM group could cross over to the mPNS group, initiating phase 2. All patients were followed up for 90 days after the first mPNS treatment. The primary end point was the between-group comparison of the proportion of responders, a subject who experienced ≥50% reduction from baseline in neuropathic pain measured by visual analog scale on day 30. Secondary end points included between-group comparison of percentage change from baseline for pain and numbness scores (days 30/90), responders to mPNS (day 90), and results from other quality-of-life measures (day 90).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 92 subjects were screened, 71 met the study inclusion/exclusion criteria and were treated. Subjects were similar in the groups, except for sex: 24 men (48%) in the mPNS group (n = 50) and 18 (85.7%) in the sham group (n = 21) (p = 0.0096). In the per-protocol analysis set, the mPNS group had a 72.3% responder rate (day 30) compared with 0% for sham (72.3% difference; 95% CI, 54.3-84.8; p < 0.0001), and 57.8% pain reduction from baseline, with 12.1% for sham. At day 90, mPNS had an 81.4% responder rate with 75.7% average pain reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data revealed that mPNS+CMM is superior to Sham+CMM at day 30 when used for treating pain from PDN. mPNS should be considered earlier in the treatment algorithm for PDN.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT05620225 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05620225). The study was first posted on November 9, 2022, and the first patient was enrolled on December 15, 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":19152,"journal":{"name":"Neuromodulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuromodulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.03.074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Current treatments for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) have variable effectiveness and known side effects. Noninvasive magnetic peripheral nerve stimulation (mPNS) provides effective pain relief without the side effects associated with interventional approaches. This study measured the differences in pain relief, sensory, and quality of life improvements using mPNS and conventional medical management (CMM) compared with sham and CMM in patients with PDN.

Materials and methods: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2022 to November 2023. Patients were randomized to receive either mPNS and CMM or sham and CMM. Subjects were randomized to treatment groups in a 3:1 ratio to mPNS+CMM or Sham+CMM and observed for 30 days during the double-blinded phase (phase 1). At 30 days, the subjects in the Sham+CMM group could cross over to the mPNS group, initiating phase 2. All patients were followed up for 90 days after the first mPNS treatment. The primary end point was the between-group comparison of the proportion of responders, a subject who experienced ≥50% reduction from baseline in neuropathic pain measured by visual analog scale on day 30. Secondary end points included between-group comparison of percentage change from baseline for pain and numbness scores (days 30/90), responders to mPNS (day 90), and results from other quality-of-life measures (day 90).

Results: After 92 subjects were screened, 71 met the study inclusion/exclusion criteria and were treated. Subjects were similar in the groups, except for sex: 24 men (48%) in the mPNS group (n = 50) and 18 (85.7%) in the sham group (n = 21) (p = 0.0096). In the per-protocol analysis set, the mPNS group had a 72.3% responder rate (day 30) compared with 0% for sham (72.3% difference; 95% CI, 54.3-84.8; p < 0.0001), and 57.8% pain reduction from baseline, with 12.1% for sham. At day 90, mPNS had an 81.4% responder rate with 75.7% average pain reduction.

Conclusions: The data revealed that mPNS+CMM is superior to Sham+CMM at day 30 when used for treating pain from PDN. mPNS should be considered earlier in the treatment algorithm for PDN.

Clinical trial registration: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT05620225 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05620225). The study was first posted on November 9, 2022, and the first patient was enrolled on December 15, 2022.

磁周围神经刺激治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变的安全性和有效性。
目的:目前治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变(PDN)有不同的疗效和已知的副作用。无创磁周围神经刺激(mPNS)提供有效的疼痛缓解,没有与介入方法相关的副作用。本研究测量了PDN患者使用mPNS和常规医疗管理(CMM)与假手术和CMM相比在疼痛缓解、感觉和生活质量改善方面的差异。材料和方法:于2022年12月至2023年11月进行了一项多中心随机临床试验。患者被随机分配接受mPNS和CMM或假手术和CMM。受试者按mPNS+CMM或Sham+CMM的3:1比例随机分为治疗组,在双盲期(一期)观察30天。在第30天,Sham+CMM组的受试者可以过渡到mPNS组,开始第2阶段。所有患者在首次mPNS治疗后随访90天。主要终点是反应者比例的组间比较,反应者是在第30天通过视觉模拟量表测量的神经性疼痛比基线减少≥50%的受试者。次要终点包括组间比较疼痛和麻木评分与基线的百分比变化(30/90天)、mPNS应答(90天)和其他生活质量测量结果(90天)。结果:92名受试者经过筛选,71名符合研究纳入/排除标准并接受治疗。除性别外,各组受试者相似:mPNS组(n = 50) 24名男性(48%),假手术组(n = 21) 18名男性(85.7%)(p = 0.0096)。在每个方案分析集中,mPNS组的应答率为72.3%(第30天),而sham组为0%(差异为72.3%;95% ci, 54.3-84.8;P < 0.0001),疼痛较基线减少57.8%,假手术组减少12.1%。在第90天,mPNS的应答率为81.4%,平均疼痛减轻75.7%。结论:数据显示mPNS+CMM在治疗PDN疼痛的第30天优于Sham+CMM。在PDN的治疗算法中应优先考虑mPNS。临床试验注册:该研究的Clinicaltrials.gov注册号为NCT05620225 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05620225)。该研究于2022年11月9日首次发布,第一位患者于2022年12月15日入组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuromodulation
Neuromodulation 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
978
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface is the preeminent journal in the area of neuromodulation, providing our readership with the state of the art clinical, translational, and basic science research in the field. For clinicians, engineers, scientists and members of the biotechnology industry alike, Neuromodulation provides timely and rigorously peer-reviewed articles on the technology, science, and clinical application of devices that interface with the nervous system to treat disease and improve function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信