Quality Score Among Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Trends, Racial Disparities, and Impact on Outcomes.

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Diamantis I Tsilimigras, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Brittany L Waterman, Anne M Noonan, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"Quality Score Among Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Trends, Racial Disparities, and Impact on Outcomes.","authors":"Diamantis I Tsilimigras, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Brittany L Waterman, Anne M Noonan, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of the quality of care delivered to patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has been limited. We sought to examine trends and racial/ethnic disparities in quality of care among patients with mPDAC as well as the impact on outcomes using a novel and easily applied quality metric.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with mPDAC between 2005 and 2019 were identified using SEER-Medicare data. Achievement of a quality score based on 3 criteria was assessed: (1) cancer-specific survival (CSS) >12 months, (2) receipt of systemic therapy, and (3) utilization of hospice/palliative care services. We examined factors associated with achieving the quality score, including race/ethnicity, social vulnerability index (SVI), and year of treatment. The impact of the quality score on CSS was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14,147 patients with mPDAC, 62.2% (n=8,794) received systemic therapy, 83.3% (n=11,791) utilized palliative care/hospice services, and 13.7% (n=1,933) had CSS >12 months after diagnosis. Achievement of at least one quality criterion increased over time (from 84.5% in 2005 to 97.0% in 2019; P<.001). Multivariable analysis showed that a high overall SVI (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.91) was independently associated with lower odds of meeting at least one quality criterion. This effect was mainly driven by the SVI subthemes of high socioeconomic status (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90) and high racial/ethnic minority status (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.93). Achievement of quality score ≥1 (excluding CSS criterion) was associated with improved overall survival (1-year CSS, 14.5% vs 3.2%; P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately 9 in 10 patients with mPDAC achieved at least one of the quality score criteria, though racial/ethnic minority patients and socially vulnerable populations had lower achievement. Lower quality score achievement was associated with poorer long-term survival. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to meet quality metrics for all patients with mPDAC to mitigate disparities in end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of the quality of care delivered to patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has been limited. We sought to examine trends and racial/ethnic disparities in quality of care among patients with mPDAC as well as the impact on outcomes using a novel and easily applied quality metric.

Methods: Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with mPDAC between 2005 and 2019 were identified using SEER-Medicare data. Achievement of a quality score based on 3 criteria was assessed: (1) cancer-specific survival (CSS) >12 months, (2) receipt of systemic therapy, and (3) utilization of hospice/palliative care services. We examined factors associated with achieving the quality score, including race/ethnicity, social vulnerability index (SVI), and year of treatment. The impact of the quality score on CSS was also analyzed.

Results: Among 14,147 patients with mPDAC, 62.2% (n=8,794) received systemic therapy, 83.3% (n=11,791) utilized palliative care/hospice services, and 13.7% (n=1,933) had CSS >12 months after diagnosis. Achievement of at least one quality criterion increased over time (from 84.5% in 2005 to 97.0% in 2019; P<.001). Multivariable analysis showed that a high overall SVI (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.91) was independently associated with lower odds of meeting at least one quality criterion. This effect was mainly driven by the SVI subthemes of high socioeconomic status (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90) and high racial/ethnic minority status (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.93). Achievement of quality score ≥1 (excluding CSS criterion) was associated with improved overall survival (1-year CSS, 14.5% vs 3.2%; P<.001).

Conclusions: Approximately 9 in 10 patients with mPDAC achieved at least one of the quality score criteria, though racial/ethnic minority patients and socially vulnerable populations had lower achievement. Lower quality score achievement was associated with poorer long-term survival. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to meet quality metrics for all patients with mPDAC to mitigate disparities in end-of-life care.

转移性胰腺导管腺癌患者的质量评分:趋势、种族差异和对结果的影响
背景:对转移性胰腺导管腺癌(mPDAC)患者的护理质量评价有限。我们试图使用一种新颖且易于应用的质量指标来研究mPDAC患者的护理质量趋势和种族/民族差异,以及对结果的影响。方法:使用SEER-Medicare数据确定2005年至2019年间诊断为mPDAC的医疗保险受益人。根据3个标准评估质量评分的实现情况:(1)癌症特异性生存(CSS) bbb12个月,(2)接受全身治疗,(3)安宁疗护/姑息治疗服务的利用。我们检查了与获得质量评分相关的因素,包括种族/民族、社会脆弱性指数(SVI)和治疗年份。分析了质量评分对CSS的影响。结果:在14,147例mPDAC患者中,62.2% (n=8,794)接受了全身治疗,83.3% (n=11,791)接受了姑息治疗/临终关怀服务,13.7% (n=1,933)在诊断后12个月接受了CSS bb0。至少一项质量标准的达标率随着时间的推移而提高(从2005年的84.5%提高到2019年的97.0%;结论:大约9 / 10的mPDAC患者达到了至少一项质量评分标准,尽管少数种族/民族患者和社会弱势群体的成就较低。较低的质量评分成就与较差的长期生存有关。这些发现强调需要有针对性的干预措施来满足所有mPDAC患者的质量指标,以减轻临终关怀的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信