Diamantis I Tsilimigras, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Brittany L Waterman, Anne M Noonan, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"Quality Score Among Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Trends, Racial Disparities, and Impact on Outcomes.","authors":"Diamantis I Tsilimigras, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Brittany L Waterman, Anne M Noonan, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of the quality of care delivered to patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has been limited. We sought to examine trends and racial/ethnic disparities in quality of care among patients with mPDAC as well as the impact on outcomes using a novel and easily applied quality metric.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with mPDAC between 2005 and 2019 were identified using SEER-Medicare data. Achievement of a quality score based on 3 criteria was assessed: (1) cancer-specific survival (CSS) >12 months, (2) receipt of systemic therapy, and (3) utilization of hospice/palliative care services. We examined factors associated with achieving the quality score, including race/ethnicity, social vulnerability index (SVI), and year of treatment. The impact of the quality score on CSS was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14,147 patients with mPDAC, 62.2% (n=8,794) received systemic therapy, 83.3% (n=11,791) utilized palliative care/hospice services, and 13.7% (n=1,933) had CSS >12 months after diagnosis. Achievement of at least one quality criterion increased over time (from 84.5% in 2005 to 97.0% in 2019; P<.001). Multivariable analysis showed that a high overall SVI (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.91) was independently associated with lower odds of meeting at least one quality criterion. This effect was mainly driven by the SVI subthemes of high socioeconomic status (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90) and high racial/ethnic minority status (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.93). Achievement of quality score ≥1 (excluding CSS criterion) was associated with improved overall survival (1-year CSS, 14.5% vs 3.2%; P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately 9 in 10 patients with mPDAC achieved at least one of the quality score criteria, though racial/ethnic minority patients and socially vulnerable populations had lower achievement. Lower quality score achievement was associated with poorer long-term survival. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to meet quality metrics for all patients with mPDAC to mitigate disparities in end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Evaluation of the quality of care delivered to patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has been limited. We sought to examine trends and racial/ethnic disparities in quality of care among patients with mPDAC as well as the impact on outcomes using a novel and easily applied quality metric.
Methods: Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with mPDAC between 2005 and 2019 were identified using SEER-Medicare data. Achievement of a quality score based on 3 criteria was assessed: (1) cancer-specific survival (CSS) >12 months, (2) receipt of systemic therapy, and (3) utilization of hospice/palliative care services. We examined factors associated with achieving the quality score, including race/ethnicity, social vulnerability index (SVI), and year of treatment. The impact of the quality score on CSS was also analyzed.
Results: Among 14,147 patients with mPDAC, 62.2% (n=8,794) received systemic therapy, 83.3% (n=11,791) utilized palliative care/hospice services, and 13.7% (n=1,933) had CSS >12 months after diagnosis. Achievement of at least one quality criterion increased over time (from 84.5% in 2005 to 97.0% in 2019; P<.001). Multivariable analysis showed that a high overall SVI (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.91) was independently associated with lower odds of meeting at least one quality criterion. This effect was mainly driven by the SVI subthemes of high socioeconomic status (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90) and high racial/ethnic minority status (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.93). Achievement of quality score ≥1 (excluding CSS criterion) was associated with improved overall survival (1-year CSS, 14.5% vs 3.2%; P<.001).
Conclusions: Approximately 9 in 10 patients with mPDAC achieved at least one of the quality score criteria, though racial/ethnic minority patients and socially vulnerable populations had lower achievement. Lower quality score achievement was associated with poorer long-term survival. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to meet quality metrics for all patients with mPDAC to mitigate disparities in end-of-life care.
期刊介绍:
JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care.
Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship.
JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.