Global patterns of utilization of noninvasive tests for the clinical management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Communications Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/HC9.0000000000000678
Alina M Allen, Jeffrey V Lazarus, Naim Alkhouri, Mazen Noureddin, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Emmanuel A Tsochatzis, Leyla de Avila, Andrei Racila, Fatema Nader, Henry E Mark, Linda Henry, Maria Stepanova, Laurent Castera, Zobair M Younossi
{"title":"Global patterns of utilization of noninvasive tests for the clinical management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.","authors":"Alina M Allen, Jeffrey V Lazarus, Naim Alkhouri, Mazen Noureddin, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Emmanuel A Tsochatzis, Leyla de Avila, Andrei Racila, Fatema Nader, Henry E Mark, Linda Henry, Maria Stepanova, Laurent Castera, Zobair M Younossi","doi":"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noninvasive tests (NITs) are used to risk-stratify metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. The aim was to survey global patterns of real-world use of NITs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 38-item survey was designed by the Global NASH Council. Providers were asked about risks for advanced fibrosis, which NITs (cutoff values) they use to risk-stratify liver disease, monitor progression, and which professional guidelines they follow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 321 participants from 43 countries completed the survey (54% hepatologists, 28% gastroenterologists, and 18% other). Of the respondents, 85% would risk-stratify patients with type 2 diabetes, obesity (82%), or abnormal liver enzymes (73%). Among NITs to rule out significant or advanced fibrosis, transient elastography (TE) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) were most used, followed by NAFLD Fibrosis Score, Enhanced Liver Fibrosis, and magnetic resonance elastography. The cutoffs for ruling out significant fibrosis varied considerably between practices and from guidelines, with only 50% using TE <8 kPa, 65% using FIB-4 <1.30 for age <65, and 41% using FIB-4 <2.00 for age ≥65. Similar variability was found for ruling in advanced fibrosis, where thresholds of FIB-4 ≥2.67 and TE ≥10 kPa were used by 20% and 17%, respectively. To establish advanced fibrosis, 48% would use 2 NITs while 23% would consider 1 NIT, and 17% would confirm with liver biopsy. TE was used by >75% to monitor, and 66% would monitor (intermediate or high risk) annually. Finally, 65% follow professional guideline recommendations regarding NITs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In clinical practice, there is variability in NIT use and their thresholds. Additionally, there is suboptimal adherence to professional societies' guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12978,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Communications","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Noninvasive tests (NITs) are used to risk-stratify metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. The aim was to survey global patterns of real-world use of NITs.

Methods: A 38-item survey was designed by the Global NASH Council. Providers were asked about risks for advanced fibrosis, which NITs (cutoff values) they use to risk-stratify liver disease, monitor progression, and which professional guidelines they follow.

Results: A total of 321 participants from 43 countries completed the survey (54% hepatologists, 28% gastroenterologists, and 18% other). Of the respondents, 85% would risk-stratify patients with type 2 diabetes, obesity (82%), or abnormal liver enzymes (73%). Among NITs to rule out significant or advanced fibrosis, transient elastography (TE) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) were most used, followed by NAFLD Fibrosis Score, Enhanced Liver Fibrosis, and magnetic resonance elastography. The cutoffs for ruling out significant fibrosis varied considerably between practices and from guidelines, with only 50% using TE <8 kPa, 65% using FIB-4 <1.30 for age <65, and 41% using FIB-4 <2.00 for age ≥65. Similar variability was found for ruling in advanced fibrosis, where thresholds of FIB-4 ≥2.67 and TE ≥10 kPa were used by 20% and 17%, respectively. To establish advanced fibrosis, 48% would use 2 NITs while 23% would consider 1 NIT, and 17% would confirm with liver biopsy. TE was used by >75% to monitor, and 66% would monitor (intermediate or high risk) annually. Finally, 65% follow professional guideline recommendations regarding NITs.

Conclusions: In clinical practice, there is variability in NIT use and their thresholds. Additionally, there is suboptimal adherence to professional societies' guidelines.

非侵入性检查用于代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病临床管理的全球模式
背景:无创测试(NITs)用于对代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪变性肝病进行风险分层。目的是调查现实世界中nit使用的全球模式。方法:全球NASH委员会设计了一项38项调查。提供者被问及晚期纤维化的风险,他们使用哪些nit(临界值)来对肝脏疾病进行风险分层,监测进展,以及他们遵循哪些专业指南。结果:共有来自43个国家的321名参与者完成了调查(54%的肝病学家,28%的胃肠病学家,18%的其他)。在应答者中,85%的人会对2型糖尿病、肥胖(82%)或肝酶异常(73%)的患者进行风险分层。在排除严重或晚期纤维化的nit中,最常用的是瞬时弹性成像(TE)和纤维化-4 (FIB-4),其次是NAFLD纤维化评分、增强肝纤维化和磁共振弹性成像。排除显著纤维化的临界值在实践和指南之间差异很大,只有50%的人使用TE进行监测,75%的人进行监测,66%的人每年进行监测(中度或高风险)。最后,65%的人遵循有关nit的专业指南建议。结论:在临床实践中,NIT的使用及其阈值存在可变性。此外,对专业协会指导方针的遵守也不够理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatology Communications
Hepatology Communications GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology Communications is a peer-reviewed, online-only, open access journal for fast dissemination of high quality basic, translational, and clinical research in hepatology. Hepatology Communications maintains high standard and rigorous peer review. Because of its open access nature, authors retain the copyright to their works, all articles are immediately available and free to read and share, and it is fully compliant with funder and institutional mandates. The journal is committed to fast publication and author satisfaction. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信