Disparities in Pediatric Emergency Department Revisits Within 7 Days by Disease Process.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sagar D Mehta, Chris A Rees, Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Andrew Jergel, Scott Gillespie, Jay Shah, Michelle Wallace, Nikolay Braykov, Evan Orenstein, Harold K Simon
{"title":"Disparities in Pediatric Emergency Department Revisits Within 7 Days by Disease Process.","authors":"Sagar D Mehta, Chris A Rees, Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Andrew Jergel, Scott Gillespie, Jay Shah, Michelle Wallace, Nikolay Braykov, Evan Orenstein, Harold K Simon","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify disease processes in which patients experienced the greatest rates of emergency department (ED) revisit disparities by race, ethnicity, language, insurance, and Childhood Opportunity Index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study of ED visits at a comprehensive pediatric health system encompassing three EDs. We included all pediatric (0 to 18 y) ED encounters that led to a discharge home (2018 to 2022). The primary outcome was ED revisit within 7 days of the index encounter. We performed multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationship between diagnoses, patient demographics, and 7-day ED revisit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,008,651 total ED encounters included [53% (n = 529,960) were male]. Of all encounters, 52,176 (5.2%) had a 7-day ED revisit within the system. Patients who identified as black/African American (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.11-1.17), multiracial (aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.22), Hispanic (aOR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.17-1.26), and those with public insurance (aOR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.16-1.23) had greater odds of ED revisit. Disparities in ED revisits among Hispanic patients were concentrated in a few high-volume diagnoses, particularly within ear, nose, throat (ENT)/dental/mouth diseases (aOR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.21) such as upper respiratory infections and infectious ear diseases. Conversely, disparities in ED revisits for black/African American patients were widespread across a broader range of diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disease-focused interventions are needed to reduce disparities in ED return visits. Focusing on upstream determinants of health may better reduce the burden of ED revisits for minoritized populations at risk of ED revisits.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify disease processes in which patients experienced the greatest rates of emergency department (ED) revisit disparities by race, ethnicity, language, insurance, and Childhood Opportunity Index.

Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study of ED visits at a comprehensive pediatric health system encompassing three EDs. We included all pediatric (0 to 18 y) ED encounters that led to a discharge home (2018 to 2022). The primary outcome was ED revisit within 7 days of the index encounter. We performed multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationship between diagnoses, patient demographics, and 7-day ED revisit.

Results: There were 1,008,651 total ED encounters included [53% (n = 529,960) were male]. Of all encounters, 52,176 (5.2%) had a 7-day ED revisit within the system. Patients who identified as black/African American (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.11-1.17), multiracial (aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.22), Hispanic (aOR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.17-1.26), and those with public insurance (aOR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.16-1.23) had greater odds of ED revisit. Disparities in ED revisits among Hispanic patients were concentrated in a few high-volume diagnoses, particularly within ear, nose, throat (ENT)/dental/mouth diseases (aOR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.21) such as upper respiratory infections and infectious ear diseases. Conversely, disparities in ED revisits for black/African American patients were widespread across a broader range of diagnoses.

Conclusions: Disease-focused interventions are needed to reduce disparities in ED return visits. Focusing on upstream determinants of health may better reduce the burden of ED revisits for minoritized populations at risk of ED revisits.

小儿急诊科7天内疾病进程的差异
目的:通过种族、民族、语言、保险和儿童机会指数的差异,确定患者在急诊科(ED)发生率最高的疾病过程。方法:我们对包括三名急诊科在内的综合儿科卫生系统的急诊科就诊进行了回顾性横断面研究。我们纳入了所有导致出院的儿科(0至18岁)急诊科就诊(2018年至2022年)。主要结局是在7天内复查ED。我们采用多变量逻辑回归来评估诊断、患者人口统计学和7天ED重访之间的关系。结果:共纳入1008,651例ED病例[53% (n = 529,960)为男性]。在所有遭遇中,52176例(5.2%)在系统内进行了为期7天的ED重访。黑人/非裔美国人(调整比值比[aOR]: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.11-1.17)、多种族(aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.22)、西班牙裔(aOR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.17-1.26)和有公共保险(aOR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.16-1.23)的患者ED重访的几率更高。西班牙裔患者在急诊科就诊的差异主要集中在一些高诊量的诊断上,特别是耳鼻喉(ENT)/牙科/口腔疾病(aOR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.21),如上呼吸道感染和感染性耳部疾病。相反,黑人/非裔美国患者在急诊科就诊的差异在更广泛的诊断范围内普遍存在。结论:需要以疾病为重点的干预措施来减少急诊科回访的差异。关注健康的上游决定因素可以更好地减轻有ED复诊风险的少数群体的ED复诊负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信