Amyloid-β PET Positivity Among Cognitively Impaired People with HIV Over Age 60.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Samuel Wilson, Andjelika Milicic, Shireen Javandel, Claire Yballa, Benedetta Milanini, Kilian Pohl, Robert Paul, Victor Valcour
{"title":"Amyloid-β PET Positivity Among Cognitively Impaired People with HIV Over Age 60.","authors":"Samuel Wilson, Andjelika Milicic, Shireen Javandel, Claire Yballa, Benedetta Milanini, Kilian Pohl, Robert Paul, Victor Valcour","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to characterize the frequency of amyloid-PET positivity among older cognitively impaired people with HIV (PWH) compared to cognitively unimpaired people without HIV (PWoH). We also examined the neuropsychological profiles of the PWH group by amyloid-PET status, cross-sectionally and longitudinally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Virally suppressed PWH were sought for a study of HAND where amyloid-PET positivity was used to exclude the possibility of AD. Participants underwent a standardized neuropsychological battery to diagnose HAND. Age and sex-matched cognitively unimpaired PWoH were identified from a separate cohort at our site. No participant from either group showed clinical signs and symptoms in a pattern concerning for AD. All participants completed amyloid-PET ([18F]Florbetapir). A certified neurologist visually read these as amyloid positive (PET+) or negative (PET-).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to cognitively unimpaired PWoH (n=65, mean age=67), the cognitively impaired PWH group (n=74, mean age=69) was predominantly male (94.6% vs. 72.3%, p<0.001), of non-hispanic white ethnicity (74.3% vs. 83.1%, p=0.211) and reported lower educational attainment (16.2 vs. 17.4 years, p<0.001). Among them, 6 (8.1%) had PET+ scans compared to 14 PWoH (21.5 %, p=0.024). Within the PWH group, we did not identify differences in the neuropsychological testing pattern by amyloid-PET status (all p-values >0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cognitively impaired PWH did not show increased frequency of amyloid positivity relative to cognitively unimpaired PWoH. Among PWH, cognitive performance did not differ by amyloid-PET status in analyses of cross-sectional baseline and longitudinal performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14588,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We sought to characterize the frequency of amyloid-PET positivity among older cognitively impaired people with HIV (PWH) compared to cognitively unimpaired people without HIV (PWoH). We also examined the neuropsychological profiles of the PWH group by amyloid-PET status, cross-sectionally and longitudinally.

Methods: Virally suppressed PWH were sought for a study of HAND where amyloid-PET positivity was used to exclude the possibility of AD. Participants underwent a standardized neuropsychological battery to diagnose HAND. Age and sex-matched cognitively unimpaired PWoH were identified from a separate cohort at our site. No participant from either group showed clinical signs and symptoms in a pattern concerning for AD. All participants completed amyloid-PET ([18F]Florbetapir). A certified neurologist visually read these as amyloid positive (PET+) or negative (PET-).

Results: Compared to cognitively unimpaired PWoH (n=65, mean age=67), the cognitively impaired PWH group (n=74, mean age=69) was predominantly male (94.6% vs. 72.3%, p<0.001), of non-hispanic white ethnicity (74.3% vs. 83.1%, p=0.211) and reported lower educational attainment (16.2 vs. 17.4 years, p<0.001). Among them, 6 (8.1%) had PET+ scans compared to 14 PWoH (21.5 %, p=0.024). Within the PWH group, we did not identify differences in the neuropsychological testing pattern by amyloid-PET status (all p-values >0.05).

Conclusion: Cognitively impaired PWH did not show increased frequency of amyloid positivity relative to cognitively unimpaired PWoH. Among PWH, cognitive performance did not differ by amyloid-PET status in analyses of cross-sectional baseline and longitudinal performance.

60岁以上认知障碍HIV感染者中淀粉样蛋白-β PET阳性
目的:我们试图将老年认知受损的HIV感染者(PWH)与认知未受损的HIV感染者(PWoH)的淀粉样蛋白pet阳性频率进行比较。我们还通过淀粉样蛋白- pet状态,横断面和纵向检查了PWH组的神经心理学概况。方法:寻找病毒抑制的PWH来研究HAND,用淀粉样蛋白- pet阳性来排除AD的可能性。参与者接受了标准化的神经心理学测试来诊断HAND。年龄和性别匹配的认知功能未受损的PWoH是在我们现场的一个单独的队列中发现的。两组参与者均未表现出与AD相关的临床体征和症状。所有参与者完成淀粉样蛋白pet ([18F]Florbetapir)。一位经过认证的神经学家目视将其解读为淀粉样蛋白阳性(PET+)或阴性(PET-)。结果:与认知功能受损的PWH组(n=65,平均年龄=67)相比,认知功能受损的PWH组(n=74,平均年龄=69)以男性为主(94.6%比72.3%,p0.05)。结论:与认知功能受损的PWH相比,认知功能受损的PWH没有表现出淀粉样蛋白阳性的频率增加。在PWH中,在横断面基线和纵向表现分析中,淀粉样蛋白- pet状态的认知表现没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
490
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes​ seeks to end the HIV epidemic by presenting important new science across all disciplines that advance our understanding of the biology, treatment and prevention of HIV infection worldwide. JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes is the trusted, interdisciplinary resource for HIV- and AIDS-related information with a strong focus on basic and translational science, clinical science, and epidemiology and prevention. Co-edited by the foremost leaders in clinical virology, molecular biology, and epidemiology, JAIDS publishes vital information on the advances in diagnosis and treatment of HIV infections, as well as the latest research in the development of therapeutics and vaccine approaches. This ground-breaking journal brings together rigorously peer-reviewed articles, reviews of current research, results of clinical trials, and epidemiologic reports from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信