Treatment of multilevel cervical disc disease with standalone cervical cages with or without anterior plating: A prospective randomized comparative study.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Mahmoud Abousayed, Yasser Elmiligui, Wael Koptan, Mostafa Elhamaky, Ahmed Samir Barakat, Ahmed Maher Sultan
{"title":"Treatment of multilevel cervical disc disease with standalone cervical cages with or without anterior plating: A prospective randomized comparative study.","authors":"Mahmoud Abousayed, Yasser Elmiligui, Wael Koptan, Mostafa Elhamaky, Ahmed Samir Barakat, Ahmed Maher Sultan","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_148_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to compare the results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using standalone cages versus cages with anterior plating for multilevel cervical disc disease with a 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>ACDF is a commonly performed procedure in cases of neural compression caused by osteophytes or disc material. Some spine surgeons have reported unsatisfactory outcomes and fusion rates secondary to a high rate of cage subsidence and pseudoarthrosis. Internal fixation using anterior cervical plate has been developed as an adjunct to ACDF to enhance the stability provided by the intervertebral cages.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total number of 60 consecutive patients diagnosed with multilevel cervical disc disease (two or more) underwent ACDF with or without additional anterior plating, between August 2021 and March 2022. Only 50 patients completed the follow-up which was ranged from 20 to 26 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age and sex. Comparing the pre and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for both neck pain and brachialgia and neck disability index (NDI) in both groups was statistically significant. There was no significant statistical difference between the two groups regarding the postoperative clinical outcomes. There was a significant statistical difference in the fused segment lordotic angle (FSA) being greater in the plating group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of stand-alone cages in two-level ACDF or more in our study had a shorter operative time and hospital stay when compared to ACDF with anterior plating with greater FSA in the plate group but with no difference in clinical outcome after 2-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":"16 1","pages":"89-95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_148_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to compare the results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using standalone cages versus cages with anterior plating for multilevel cervical disc disease with a 2-year follow-up.

Background: ACDF is a commonly performed procedure in cases of neural compression caused by osteophytes or disc material. Some spine surgeons have reported unsatisfactory outcomes and fusion rates secondary to a high rate of cage subsidence and pseudoarthrosis. Internal fixation using anterior cervical plate has been developed as an adjunct to ACDF to enhance the stability provided by the intervertebral cages.

Patients and methods: A total number of 60 consecutive patients diagnosed with multilevel cervical disc disease (two or more) underwent ACDF with or without additional anterior plating, between August 2021 and March 2022. Only 50 patients completed the follow-up which was ranged from 20 to 26 months.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age and sex. Comparing the pre and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for both neck pain and brachialgia and neck disability index (NDI) in both groups was statistically significant. There was no significant statistical difference between the two groups regarding the postoperative clinical outcomes. There was a significant statistical difference in the fused segment lordotic angle (FSA) being greater in the plating group.

Conclusion: The use of stand-alone cages in two-level ACDF or more in our study had a shorter operative time and hospital stay when compared to ACDF with anterior plating with greater FSA in the plate group but with no difference in clinical outcome after 2-year follow-up.

带或不带前钢板的独立颈椎笼治疗多节段颈椎间盘疾病:一项前瞻性随机比较研究
目的:本研究的目的是通过2年的随访,比较使用独立式椎笼与前路钢板椎笼治疗多节段颈椎间盘病变的前路椎间盘切除术融合(ACDF)的结果。背景:ACDF是由骨赘或椎间盘材料引起的神经压迫的常用手术。一些脊柱外科医生报道了由于假关节和关节笼下沉率高而继发的不满意的结果和融合率。颈椎前路钢板内固定已发展成为ACDF的辅助手段,以增强椎间笼提供的稳定性。患者和方法:在2021年8月至2022年3月期间,总共有60名连续诊断为多节段颈椎间盘疾病(两个或两个以上)的患者接受了ACDF,有或没有额外的前路钢板。只有50例患者完成了20至26个月的随访。结果:两组患者年龄、性别差异无统计学意义。比较两组患者术前和术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)对颈部疼痛和臂痛及颈部残疾指数(NDI)的评分,差异均有统计学意义。两组术后临床结果比较,差异无统计学意义。两组间融合节段前凸角(FSA)差异有统计学意义。结论:在我们的研究中,使用独立笼治疗2级或以上ACDF的手术时间和住院时间比钢板组的ACDF前钢板更短,但2年随访后的临床结果没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信