Shinji Miwa, Norio Yamamoto, Katsuhiro Hayashi, Yuta Taniguchi, Hirotaka Yonezawa, Sei Morinaga, Satoru Demura
{"title":"Current and emerging systemic treatment options for malignant fibrous histiocytoma/undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma.","authors":"Shinji Miwa, Norio Yamamoto, Katsuhiro Hayashi, Yuta Taniguchi, Hirotaka Yonezawa, Sei Morinaga, Satoru Demura","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02712-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS)/malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) is the second most common soft-tissue sarcoma. The standard treatment options for UPS/MFH include tumor excision with appropriate surgical margins, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Preferable clinical outcomes can be expected in patients with resectable disease, whereas the clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic disease are unsatisfactory despite multidisciplinary treatment. Although patients with metastatic diseases require chemotherapy, the response rate to conventional chemotherapy has been reported to be only 27-33% in previous reports. Systemic treatment is required to eliminate metastatic disease and improve clinical outcomes in patients with UPS/MFH. Recent clinical studies have investigated the optimal period of conventional chemotherapy and the efficacy of various combinations of anticancer agents. Furthermore, molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown superior outcomes compared to standard treatments for various types of malignancies. Therefore, these anticancer agents are considered as new treatment options for patients with UPS/MFH. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these agents in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, including UPS/MFH. In particular, a high response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with doxorubicin has been reported in recent clinical trials; however, combination therapy needs to be assessed in a large number of patients with UPS/MFH. In this review article, recent clinical studies on the systemic treatment of UPS/MFH are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02712-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS)/malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) is the second most common soft-tissue sarcoma. The standard treatment options for UPS/MFH include tumor excision with appropriate surgical margins, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Preferable clinical outcomes can be expected in patients with resectable disease, whereas the clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic disease are unsatisfactory despite multidisciplinary treatment. Although patients with metastatic diseases require chemotherapy, the response rate to conventional chemotherapy has been reported to be only 27-33% in previous reports. Systemic treatment is required to eliminate metastatic disease and improve clinical outcomes in patients with UPS/MFH. Recent clinical studies have investigated the optimal period of conventional chemotherapy and the efficacy of various combinations of anticancer agents. Furthermore, molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown superior outcomes compared to standard treatments for various types of malignancies. Therefore, these anticancer agents are considered as new treatment options for patients with UPS/MFH. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these agents in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, including UPS/MFH. In particular, a high response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with doxorubicin has been reported in recent clinical trials; however, combination therapy needs to be assessed in a large number of patients with UPS/MFH. In this review article, recent clinical studies on the systemic treatment of UPS/MFH are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.