A robotic rehabilitation intervention in a home setting during the Covid-19 outbreak: a feasibility pilot study in patients with stroke.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Marco Germanotta, Maria Cristina Mauro, Francesca Falchini, Francesco Scotto Di Luzio, Luca Vollero, Loredana Zollo, Irene Giovanna Aprile
{"title":"A robotic rehabilitation intervention in a home setting during the Covid-19 outbreak: a feasibility pilot study in patients with stroke.","authors":"Marco Germanotta, Maria Cristina Mauro, Francesca Falchini, Francesco Scotto Di Luzio, Luca Vollero, Loredana Zollo, Irene Giovanna Aprile","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01633-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telerehabilitation allows patients to engage in therapy away from healthcare facilities, often in the comfort of their homes. Studies have suggested that it can effectively improve motor and cognitive function. However, its applicability may be limited to patients with severe impairments who require physical assistance. The proposed study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effects of a home-based rehabilitation program for post-stroke patients, based on the use of a planar robot, able to overcome the limitations posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 20 patients with stroke (11 men, aged 66.1 ± 9.2 years). Patients underwent 20 one-hour robotic upper limb rehabilitation sessions, consisting of the execution of planar point-to-point reaching exercises, using a robotic device in their own home, with the remote supervision of a physical therapist. We assessed the feasibility of this intervention by examining adverse events, patient satisfaction (measured on a Likert scale), usability (using the System Usability Scale, SUS), acceptability (evaluated through the Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire, TAM+), and pain onset (measured with the Numeric Rating Scale). To gauge the clinical effects of the treatment, we analyzed changes in the motor and sensory components of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) before and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The approach was safe, as we did not observe any adverse events, and patients did not experience an increase in pain levels. Patients expressed their appreciation for the treatment, providing an average Likert scale score of 8 out of 10. The usability of the treatment received high marks, with an average SUS score of 78 ± 12. Similarly, the treatment acceptability was favorable, with all examined domains scoring above 4, indicating a positive attitude towards the proposed solution. Moreover, we observed a statistically significant improvement in the motor part of the FMA-UE (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of employing a rehabilitation robot for upper limb rehabilitation in post-stroke patients within a home-based environment. These findings mark a significant step in advancing innovative and easily accessible rehabilitation options for stroke survivors, ensuring uninterrupted care and creating new opportunities to enhance their functional abilities.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrial.gov (NCT05250934).</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01633-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telerehabilitation allows patients to engage in therapy away from healthcare facilities, often in the comfort of their homes. Studies have suggested that it can effectively improve motor and cognitive function. However, its applicability may be limited to patients with severe impairments who require physical assistance. The proposed study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effects of a home-based rehabilitation program for post-stroke patients, based on the use of a planar robot, able to overcome the limitations posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We enrolled 20 patients with stroke (11 men, aged 66.1 ± 9.2 years). Patients underwent 20 one-hour robotic upper limb rehabilitation sessions, consisting of the execution of planar point-to-point reaching exercises, using a robotic device in their own home, with the remote supervision of a physical therapist. We assessed the feasibility of this intervention by examining adverse events, patient satisfaction (measured on a Likert scale), usability (using the System Usability Scale, SUS), acceptability (evaluated through the Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire, TAM+), and pain onset (measured with the Numeric Rating Scale). To gauge the clinical effects of the treatment, we analyzed changes in the motor and sensory components of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) before and after the intervention.

Results: The approach was safe, as we did not observe any adverse events, and patients did not experience an increase in pain levels. Patients expressed their appreciation for the treatment, providing an average Likert scale score of 8 out of 10. The usability of the treatment received high marks, with an average SUS score of 78 ± 12. Similarly, the treatment acceptability was favorable, with all examined domains scoring above 4, indicating a positive attitude towards the proposed solution. Moreover, we observed a statistically significant improvement in the motor part of the FMA-UE (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of employing a rehabilitation robot for upper limb rehabilitation in post-stroke patients within a home-based environment. These findings mark a significant step in advancing innovative and easily accessible rehabilitation options for stroke survivors, ensuring uninterrupted care and creating new opportunities to enhance their functional abilities.

Trial registration: clinicaltrial.gov (NCT05250934).

2019冠状病毒病暴发期间家庭环境中的机器人康复干预:一项针对中风患者的可行性试点研究
背景:远程康复允许患者远离医疗机构,通常在舒适的家中进行治疗。研究表明,它可以有效地改善运动和认知功能。然而,它的适用性可能仅限于需要身体帮助的严重损伤患者。该研究旨在评估基于平面机器人的脑卒中后患者家庭康复计划的可行性和效果,该计划能够克服COVID-19大流行带来的限制。方法:纳入20例脑卒中患者(男性11例,年龄66.1±9.2岁)。患者接受了20个1小时的机器人上肢康复疗程,包括在物理治疗师的远程监督下,在自己家中使用机器人设备进行平面点对点伸展练习。我们通过检查不良事件、患者满意度(用李克特量表测量)、可用性(使用系统可用性量表,SUS)、可接受性(通过技术接受模型问卷,TAM+评估)和疼痛发作(用数字评定量表测量)来评估该干预措施的可行性。为了评估治疗的临床效果,我们分析了干预前后Fugl-Meyer上肢评估(FMA-UE)的运动和感觉成分的变化。结果:该方法是安全的,因为我们没有观察到任何不良事件,患者也没有经历疼痛水平的增加。患者表达了他们对治疗的感激之情,Likert量表的平均得分为8分(满分10分)。治疗的可用性获得高分,平均SUS得分为78±12分。同样,治疗可接受性是有利的,所有被检查的域得分都在4以上,表明对所提出的解决方案持积极态度。此外,我们观察到FMA-UE的运动部分有统计学上显著的改善(p结论:我们的研究结果证明了在家庭环境中使用康复机器人进行中风后患者上肢康复的可行性、安全性和有效性。这些发现标志着为中风幸存者推进创新和易于获得的康复选择迈出了重要一步,确保了不间断的护理,并创造了提高其功能能力的新机会。试验注册:clinicaltrial.gov (NCT05250934)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信